Abstract
Rarely can outsiders assess the accuracy of business planning efforts by nonprofit organizations. We examine the relationship between nonprofit charter school characteristics and the accuracy of enrollment projections, which are the primary driver of organizational revenues and costs. Overall, we find that while the average charter school organization’s enrollment projection is quite accurate, there is wide variation in the quality of forecasts. School and organizational factors are especially prominent determinants of projection quality, with larger and older organizations less likely to make and present overly optimistic enrollment projections. Governance structure, including the presence of a charter management organization and different authorizer types, also matter for the quality of projections. As with all plans, the ability of charter schools to accurately project enrollments worsens dramatically in the later years of extended forecasts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We omit the largest 5 percent of positive and negative forecast errors to lessen mismeasurement concerns. Analysis including the outliers is generally consistent, although the magnitude of statistically significant relationships grows.
- 2.
The forecast percent error is calculated for charter school i, in school year t, as: \( \frac{{\mathrm{predicted}}_{it}-{\mathrm{actual}}_{it}}{{\mathrm{actual}}_{it}}\times 100. \)
References
Abola, B. D., & Spitz, S. A. (2011). Disclosure obligations of issuers of municipal securities. San Francisco, CA: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
Balboni, E., & Berry, W. (2012). Charter school bond issuance: A complete history volume 2. The Educational Facilities Financing Center of Local Initiatives Support Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.charterlenders.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LISC-Charter-School-Bond-Issuance-September-2012.pdf.
Calabrese, T. D., & Ely, T. L. (2016). Borrowing for the public good: The growing importance of tax-exempt bonds for public charities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 458–477.
Consoletti, A. (2011). The state of charter schools: What we know – and what we do not – about performance and accountability. Washington, DC: The Center for Education Reform (CER).
Ely, T. L., & Calabrese, T. D. (2017). Public borrowing for private organizations: Costs and structure of tax-exempt debt through conduit issuers. Public Budgeting & Finance, 37(1), 3–25.
Ely, T. L., & Fermanich, M. L. (2013). Learning to count: School finance formula count methods and attendance-related student outcomes. Journal of Education Finance, 38(4), 343–369.
Farrell, C., Nayfack, M. B., Smith, J., & Wohlstetter, P. (2014). One size does not fit all: understanding the variation in charter management scale-up. Journal of Educational Change, 15(1), 77–97.
Frumkin, P. (2003). Creating new schools: The strategic management of charter schools. The Annie E. Casey Foundation: Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482409.pdf.
Glander, M. (2017). Selected statistics from the public elementary and secondary education universe: School year 2015–16. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018052.
Hassel, B. (1999). Paying for the charter schoolhouse: Policy options for charter school facilities financing. St. Paul, MN: Charter Friends National Network. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED460588.pdf.
Herbig, P., Milewicz, J., & Golden, J. E. (1995). Forecasting behavioral differences between for-profit firms and nonprofit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 3(1), 3–15.
Marwell, N. P., & Calabrese, T. D. (2014). A deficit model of collaborative governance: government–nonprofit fiscal relations in the provision of child welfare services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1031–1058.
Miller, L., Gross, B., & Lake, R. (2014). Is personalized learning meeting its productivity promise? Early lessons from pioneering schools. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/publications/personalized-learning-meeting-its-productivity-promise-early-lessons-pioneering-schools.
National Association of Charter School Authorizers (NACSA). (2014). The state of charter school authorizing 2013. Chicago. Retrieved from www.qualitycharters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/NACSA_2013-SOCA.pdf.
Rebarber, T., & Zgainer, A. C. (2014). Survey of America’s charter schools 2014. Washington, DC: The Center for Education Reform (CER). Retrieved from http://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2014CharterSchoolSurveyFINAL.pdf.
Ziebarth, T. (2014). Measuring up to the model: A ranking of state charter school laws. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED568904.pdf.
Zietlow, J. T. (1989). Capital and operating budgeting practices in pure nonprofit organizations. Financial Accountability & Management, 5(4), 219–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ely, T.L. (2019). Budget Uncertainty and the Quality of Nonprofit Charter School Enrollment Projections. In: Williams, D., Calabrese, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Government Budget Forecasting. Palgrave Studies in Public Debt, Spending, and Revenue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18194-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18195-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)