Abstract
This chapter examines current year budget forecast performance for municipal governments in the United States. Midyear forecasts are especially important for governments because budgets authorize public spending and changes to legal financial plans. Ample research examines forecasts beyond the current fiscal year, yet little work analyzes forecasts made during the current fiscal year for the remainder of that year. Although an examination of the literature suggests that midyear forecasts can reflect substantial improvement, the empirical analysis shows no significant evidence of improvement and even finds evidence that expenditure forecasts become worse at shorter time horizons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Revenue forecasters also look at collections as a preview of economic conditions because these tend to be good coincident indicators of the economy. Expenditure forecasters use current year spending to discern if there are demographic or social condition changes in the jurisdiction, or provide data on signs of unexpected policy outcomes affecting agencies. In both cases, these forecasters are trying to use current year budget forecasts to improve next year’s budget.
- 2.
The formulas for error measures are provided in Appendix.
- 3.
Computed by current authors.
- 4.
The U-statistic is problematic because there are six or more variations (see Appendix).
- 5.
Those that specifically report MAPE estimates have been included. Because of the lack of comparability (see Appendix), studies that report Theil’s U but not MAPE are excluded. No reviewed studies of this sort report symmetrical mean absolute percent errors (SMAPEs).
- 6.
“Horizon” refers to the distance from forecast to prediction, so, for monthly forecasts, H3 refers to a forecast for three months into the future.
- 7.
For actual budgets, the horizons may not start at 1, but at some higher numbered period.
- 8.
The U2 values are presented, but not compared as discussed in Appendix.
- 9.
https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/u-statistic-theils/. Accessed on 12/30/18.
- 10.
Some notation has been modified to make the equation more explicit or to be consistent with other equations for Theil’s U.
- 11.
https://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/showcase/cook_forecast. Accessed on 12/30/18.
- 12.
Some notation has been modified to be consistent with other equations for Theil’s U.
References
Angus-Leppan, P., & Fatseas, V. (1986). The forecasting accuracy of trainee accountants using judgmental and statistical techniques. Accounting and Business Research, 16(63), 179–188.
Athanasopoulos, G., Hyndman, R. J., Song, H., & Wu, D. C. (2011). The tourism forecasting competition. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(3), 822–844.
Basu, S., Emmerson, C., & Frayne, C. (2003). An examination of the IFS corporation tax forecasting record. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS Working Paper WP 03/21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2003.0321.
Batchelor, R. (2007). Bias in macroeconomic forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 23(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.01.004.
Bliemel, F. (1973). Theil’s forecast accuracy coefficient: A clarification. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(4), 444–446.
Buettner, T., & Kauder, B. (2015). Political biases despite external expert participation? An empirical analysis of tax revenue forecasts in Germany. Public Choice, 164(3–4), 287–307.
Carabotta, L. (2014). Which agency and which period is the best? Analyzing national and international fiscal forecasts in Italy. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2014(1), 27–46.
Dean, A. J. H. (1976). Errors in National Institute forecasts of personal incomes, inflation and employment, 1965–75. National Institute Economic Review, 78(1), 48–57.
de Deus, J. D. B. V., & de Mendonça, H. F. (2017). Fiscal forecasting performance in an emerging economy: An empirical assessment of Brazil. Economic Systems, 41(3), 408–419.
Isiklar, G., Lahiri, K., & Loungani, P. (2006). How quickly do forecasters incorporate news? Evidence from cross-country surveys. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(6), 703–725.
Lawrence, M. J., Edmundson, R. H., & O’Connor, M. J. (1985). An examination of the accuracy of judgmental extrapolation of time series. International Journal of Forecasting, 1(1), 25–35.
Lienert, I. (2013). The legal framework for public finances and budget systems. In R. Allen, R. Hemming, & B. H. Potter (Eds.), The international handbook of public financial management (pp. 63–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Loungani, P. (2001). How accurate are private sector forecasts? Cross-country evidence from consensus forecasts of output growth. International Journal of Forecasting, 17(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(01)00098-X.
Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-competition: Results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451–476.
Makridakis, S., Andersen, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandowski, R., et al. (1982). The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition. Journal of Forecasting, 1(2), 111.
Makridakis, S., Chatfield, C., Hibon, M., Lawrence, M. J., Mills, T., Ord, K., & Simmons, L. F. (1993). The M2-competition: A real-time judgmentally based forecasting study. International Journal of Forecasting, 9(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(93)90044-N.
Marinheiro, C. F. (2011). Fiscal sustainability and the accuracy of macroeconomic forecasts: Do supranational forecasts rather than government forecasts make a difference? International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 3(2), 185–209.
Pardaev, U. (2016). Analyzes of state budget forecasting errors and issues of forecasting accuracy. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 5, 1.
Pike, T., & Savage, D. (1998). Forecasting the public finances in the Treasury. Fiscal Studies, 19(1), 49–62.
Plesko, G. A. (1988). The accuracy of government forecasts and budget projections. National Tax Journal, 41(4), 483–501.
Stekler, H. O. (1967). The federal budget as a short-term forecasting tool. The Journal of Business, 40(3), 280–285.
Williams, D. W., & Calabrese, T. D. (2016). The status of budget forecasting. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.2.2.127-160.
Zakaria, M., & Ali, S. (2010). Fiscal marksmanship in Pakistan. Lahore Journal of Economics, 15(2), 113–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Equations and Discussion of Theil’s U
Appendix: Equations and Discussion of Theil’s U
All equations used in this chapter are included in this appendix.
For this Theil’s U formula, P = the forecasted change and A = the actual change (Bliemel 1973). For all other equations, the actual and forecast refer to the whole numbers.
where M refers to an error measure (MAPE, SMAPE or Theil’s U2).
Alternate calculations of Theil’s U not used:
This equation has two variants, where P and A may either refer to the whole numbers (forecast and actual) or the forecasted and actual changes (Bliemel 1973). Zakaria and Ali (2010) offer an apparent clarification of U1 incorporating the change formulation as:
It is also possible that U2 can be calculated in both variants (whole number or change). Bliemel (1973) finds that U1 fails to effectively distinguish between accurate and inaccurate forecast, but U2 does. U1 and U2 can be confused, as seen with this internet resourceFootnote 9 that reverses the labels between U1 and U2.
Dean (1976) reintroduces the use of mean squared values in the place of squared values for U2 and gives an alternate equation asFootnote 10:
Carabotta (2014) gives the equation (although labeled “T,” it reflects the U statistic development):
Next, an internet sourceFootnote 11 uses proportionate values of change and calculates U2 asFootnote 12:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, D., Calabrese, T. (2019). Current Midyear Municipal Budget Forecast Accuracy. In: Williams, D., Calabrese, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Government Budget Forecasting. Palgrave Studies in Public Debt, Spending, and Revenue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18194-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18195-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)