Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptual and Measurement Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cultural Intelligence in the World of Work

  • 1258 Accesses

Abstract

Motivated in part by the globalization of the workplace, the concept of cultural intelligence has become enormously popular. It sought to answer the question of why individuals who were intelligent, had good social skills and were emotionally mature did not function effectively across cultures. However, since its introduction issues have been raised about both the conceptualization of the construct and its measurement. Issues with the construct of cultural intelligence include:

  • the fundamental question of whether or not such a cultural general construct can exist?

  • is cultural intelligence conceptually distinct from cross-cultural competence, global mindset, multicultural personality or a host of other related concepts?

  • if cultural intelligence is distinct, what elements comprise the concept and how are these multiple facets related to each other and to the overall construct?

In this chapter, we discuss conceptual distinctions between the two competing models of cultural intelligence. We also discuss issues related to the two instruments developed from the two competing models. The most popular measure, the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS) has been subjected to a number of independent validation studies and received critical reviews. While the Short Form Cultural Intelligence Scale (SFCQ) is conceptually distinct and has been subjected to a rigorous validation process, it has not been independently validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, I., Boulanger, M., Meyers, J., & Taras, V. (2016). The development and validation of the business cultural intelligence quotient. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23, 78–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceputalization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (pp. 3–15). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1981). Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., & Ward, C. (2006). Commentary on “Redefining interactions across cultures and organizations”. Group and Organization Management, 31, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. F. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bücker, J., Furrer, O., & Lin, Y. (2015). Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ): A new test of the CQ scale. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 15, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence—More or less: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, K. A. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence. Organization Management Journal, 6, 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, K. A. (2013). An empirical analysis of three intelligences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 45(2), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, A. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. (2002). Redefining interactions across cultures and organizations: Moving forward with cultural intelligence. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrenya, W. K. J., Van Driel, M., Culhane, E., Turner, S., Pathak, J., & Peterson, S. (2011). Validating the Cultural Intelligence Scale: What does it really measure? Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Imai, L., & Fehr, R. (2008). Thinking intelligently about cultural intelligence. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (pp. 375–387). New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R., Gudykunst, W. B., & Wiseman, R. L. (1978). Dimensions of intercultural effectiveness: An exploratory study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (2006). Cultural intelligence: Is such a capacity credible? Group and Organization Management, 31, 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. P., Lenartowicz, T., & Apud, S. (2006). Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J., & Van Dyne, L. (2012). Cultural intelligence and international leadership potential: The importance of contact for members of the majority. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 272–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klafehn, J., Li, C., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2013). To know or not to know, is that the question? Exploring the role and assessment of metacognition in cross-cultural contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 963–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., Beechlor, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, M. P., Franke, G. R., Ramsey, J. R., Clampit, J. A., Maalouf, J., Abi Aad, A. A., et al. (2017). The Cultural Intelligence Scale: Level of analysis, aggregations, and misspecifications. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Academy of International Business, Dubai, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T., Green, S., & Wood, R. (1981). An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate: Development and validation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 197–234). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCauley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, D. L., & Michailova, S. (2016). Cultural intelligence: A review and new research avenues. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1998). Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices manual. London: UK: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstuhl, T., & Van Dyne, L. (2018). A bi-factor theory of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: Meta-analysis and theoretical extensions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 148, 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaegel, C., Richte, N. F., & Taras, V. (2017). Cultural intelligence and work-related outcomes: A meta-analytic review. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 14152). https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., et al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., & Hussain, D. (2017). Current status and future directions for cultural intelligence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(1), 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. Oxford, England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous version of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. C., Elron, E., Stahl, G., Ekelund, B. Z., Ravlin, E. C., Cerdin, J.-L., et al. (2008). Cultural intelligence: Domain and assessment. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(2), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. C., Liao, Y., Aycan, Z., Cerdin, J.-L., Pekerti, A. A., Ravlin, E. C., et al. (2015). Cultural intelligence: A theory-based, short form measure. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 1099–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee, K. I., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2000). The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Koh, C. (2008). Development and validation of the CQS: The cultural intelligence scale. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (pp. 16–38). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., Fischer, R., Lam, F. S. Z., & Hall, L. (2009). The convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of scores on a self-report measure of cultural intelligence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1999). The measurement of sociocultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 659–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zung, W. W. K. (1969). A cross-cultural survey of symptoms of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 116–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of International Business, University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia

    Yuan Liao

  2. Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

    David C. Thomas

Authors
  1. Yuan Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David C. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Liao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liao, Y., Thomas, D.C. (2020). Conceptual and Measurement Issues. In: Cultural Intelligence in the World of Work. Springer Series in Emerging Cultural Perspectives in Work, Organizational, and Personnel Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18171-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation