A Perspective on Religious Diversity

  • Peter WongEmail author
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 30)


Max Charlesworth’s view in his “Ecumenism between the World Religions” is briefly summarised and discussed. His crucial question being, how can the different and varied claims of the world’s religions be reconciled when they are often incompatible with each other, and how can one come to terms with other religions in the world. Charlesworth sought to preserve the paradigmatic status of religions for their respective adherents yet allow for mutual recognition of value in each other.

This paper seeks to address and test the range of diversity that is allowable in Charlesworth’s position. For this purpose, the paper considers the case of Confucianism for it differs from theistic religions by not being centred on the belief in a deity. Rather, it has more to do with human attainment understood in the context of ritual and cultural forms: becoming human, and creating the community that enables such an attainment constitute the main religious project.

Although Charlesworth’s position is mainly informed by the theistic traditions, the paper concludes by agreeing with him that respect is the key attitude in interreligious dialogues.


Confucianism Ecumenism Max Charlesworth Interreligious dialogue World religions Herbert Fingarette Gratitude Ordinary Respect 


  1. Ames, R. T. (1998). Knowing in the Zhuangzi: “From here, on the bridge, over the River Hao”. In R. Ames (Ed.), Wandering at ease in the Zhuangzi (pp. 219–230). Ithaca: SUNY.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2001). Focusing the familiar: a translation and philosophical interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, W-T. Translator and Compiler. (1963). A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University press.Google Scholar
  5. Charlesworth, M. (1995). Ecumenism between the world religions. Sophia, 34(1), 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlesworth, M. (1997). The diversity of revelations. In Religious inventions: Four essays (pp. 23–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fingarette, H. (1972). Confucius: The secular as sacred. New York/Hagerstown/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Joy, M. (2004). Philosophy and religion. In P. Antes, A. W. Geertz, & R. R. Warne (Eds.), New approaches to the study of religion (Volume 1): Regional, critical, and historical approaches (pp. 185–217). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. Kasulis, T. (2004). Shinto: The way home. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  10. Legge, J. (?). The four books. Shanghai: The Chinese Book Company.Google Scholar
  11. Neville, R. (2009). Ritual and deference: Extending Chinese philosophyin a comparative context. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  12. Rhees, R. (1997 (1955)). Gratitude and ingratitude for existence. In D. Z. Phillips (Ed.), Rush Rhees on religion and philosophy (pp. 159–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sun, A. (2013). Confucianism as a world religion: Contested histories and contemporary realities. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wong, P. Y. J. (2012). The music of ritual practice – An interpretation. Sophia, 51(2), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in Chinese

  1. Xiong, Shili 熊十力. (1999 (1945)). Dujingshiyao《讀經示要》. 2nd ed. Volume 1. Taipei 台北: Mingwen Bookshop 明文書局.Google Scholar
  2. Wei, Zhengtong 韋政通. (1993). Zhongguozhexueqidian《中國哲學辭典》. Beijing 北京: Shuiniuchubanshe水牛出版社.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Studies Research CentreLatrobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations