Skip to main content

Trans-constructionist Prototyping with a Rare Vintage

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement (Edurobotics 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 946))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

The constructionist philosophy has a flaw that makes it anti-educational. The flaw lies in the notion, cf. constructivism, that physical objects are information sources. This cannot be true. Physical entities must be mental compositions before they may become physical constructions. Papert’s idea of an ‘object to think with’ is unsound: deriving concepts from percepts leads to error. The realm of number shows this. Thinking about objects, au contraire can be scientifically productive. For this, the notion of a ‘physical entity’ must encompass the symbolic representation of language. A logico-scientific evolution-based proof shows that perception offers a false view of reality; revealed and overcome through the thoughtful use of technology. On this foundation, a prototype design and technology course for primary school with an emphasis on robotics based on the LEGO® system was developed. Outlined and discussed, it is compared and contrasted with work from the MIT Media Lab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Papert, S.: Situating constructionism. In: Papert, S., Harel, I. (eds.) Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dúill, Ó., M.: Teaching: Traditional vs. Turing. In: Reynolds, N., Webb, M. (eds.) WCCE 2013, vol. 2, pp. 9–16. Copernicus University, Torun (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fuster, J.M.: The Prefrontal Cortex, 5th edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ó Dúill, M.: (2014) Countering and composing the mind’s lies: technicity, science and art. In: Futschek, G., Kynigos, C. (eds.) CONSTRUCTIONISM 2014, Vienna, pp. 434–443. OCG, Vienna (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papert, S.: Mindstorms. Harvester Press, Brighton (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abelson, H., diSessa, A.: Turtle Geometry. MIT Press, Cambridge (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hecht, T.: LEGO dacta: a way to learn programming in a LOGO-like language. In: EUROLOGO 1997. ELTE, Budapest (1997). https://eurologo.web.elte.hu/prog.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

  8. Erwin, B., Rogers, C., Cyr, M., Portsmore, M.: ROBOLAB™: designing a visual learning environment with LabVIEW and LEGO, Tufts University, Medford (1999) https://amper.ped.muni.cz/~fyzika/projekt/download/robolwin.doc. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  9. Marmasse, N., Bletsas, A., Marti, S.: Numerical mechanisms and children’s concept of numbers The Media Laboratory. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clayson, J. E.: Personal Communication (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuster, J.M., Bressler, S.L.: Cognit activation: a mechanism enabling temporal integration in working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16(4), 207–218 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuster, J.M.: Phyletic Memory. Personal communication (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hubel, D.H.: Eye, Brain, and Vision. Henry Holt and Company, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. 148(3), 574–591 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McBrearty, S.: Down with the revolution. In: Mellars, P., Boyle, K., Bar-Yosef, O., Stringer, C. (eds.) Rethinking the Human Revolution, pp. 133–152. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deacon, T.W.: The Symbolic Species. W. W. Norton and Company, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streidter, G.F.: Principles of Brain Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cox, M.V.: Children’s Drawings. Penguin, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ilieva, V.: LEGO and Logo in the primary school – a simple way of learning through creation. In: Clayson, J.E., Kalas, I. (eds.) CONSTRUCTIONISM 2010, Paris. Comenius University, Bratislava (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle, M.P., Ilieva, V.: Primary robotics: laying sound foundations. In: Reynolds, N., Webb, M. (eds.) WCCE 2013, TORUN, vol. 2, pp. 28–35. Copernicus University, Torun. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doyle, M.P.: Build and Animate Your World. Unpublished curriculum document. British School of Sofia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micheál Ó Dúill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ó Dúill, M. (2020). Trans-constructionist Prototyping with a Rare Vintage. In: Moro, M., Alimisis, D., Iocchi, L. (eds) Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Edurobotics 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18141-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics