Skip to main content

How the Economics Profession Got It Wrong on Brexit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter is an abridged version of working papers which are available at the Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, examining the HM Treasury evidence on the long-term harmful effects of Brexit. It also covers the LSE’s Centre for Economic Performance assessment. Both reports base their analyses either on gravity models or computable general equilibrium models. We review critically the alleged link between trade and productivity, which plays an important role in both reports. We find important flaws in both the application of gravity model results to evaluation of the costs of Brexit, and in the knock-on impacts from trade to productivity. The flaws always have the result of exaggerating the negative impact of Brexit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England, Inflation Report Press Conference (May 2016). Christine Lagarde, IMF Managing Director, Press Conference for the IMF UK Article IV Concluding Statement (May 2016).

  2. 2.

    The Costs and Benefits of Leaving the EU: The Trade Effects. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1478 April 2017. For brevity, we refer to the authors: Dhingra, Huang, Ottaviano, Pessoa, Sampson and van Reenan as Dhingra et al.

  3. 3.

    The CGE model is divided into 35 world regions; each region is disaggregated into 31 industrial sectors for goods and services. The data consist of bilateral trade relationships between each region and sector, using the United Nations COMTRADE database. The inter-sectoral relationships use the WIOD input-output tables from the European Commission (see Timmer et al. 2015).

  4. 4.

    Dhingra et al. quote their results from the working paper by Méjean and Schwellnus (2009). In the published version, Table 1, column (3) gives a convergence rate for OECD countries of 0.584 (= 1−0.416) for OECD countries and 0.394 for EU countries.

  5. 5.

    Imbs and Méjean (2017) define their sectors at the ISIC 2-digit level.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for insights gained in discussion with Adam Slater of Oxford Economics. He is not responsible for the views expressed in this paper. We are also grateful to Rachel Wagstaff of the Centre for Business Research for considerable help in the final preparation of this papers on which this chapter is based.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Coutts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coutts, K., Gudgin, G., Buchanan, J. (2019). How the Economics Profession Got It Wrong on Brexit. In: Vlachos, V., Bitzenis, A. (eds) European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18103-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18103-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18102-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18103-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics