Skip to main content

Humor’s Role in Mashups and Remixes: Similarities Between Humor Structure and Remix Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Pop Music, Culture and Identity ((PMCI))

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of humor in user-generated remixes by turning to humor theories developed primarily by scholars within the fields of philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. While the dominating theories of humor are limited to verbal humor, they also prove useful to the study of audiovisual remixes. By providing close analyses of three different forms of remixes (musical mashups, songifications, and lip-syncing), this chapter explores the way in which remixes are often constructed in a manner reminiscent of the structure of jokes (although this does not mean that humor is central to all remixes). The chapter aims at contributing to a broader understanding of remixes’ enormous and enduring popularity, and to illuminate the continuing benefits of interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of popular music.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an extended analysis of the mashup “Psychosocial Baby,” see Brøvig-Hanssen (2016).

  2. 2.

    The sonic effect of songification is similar to the AutoTune effect associated with Cher’s “Believe” from 1998, or with the rapper T-Pain, but, instead of merely correcting the audio track’s tuning of pitches, the technology goes a step further and transforms a spoken track into a sung track by means of shifting the pitches, thus creating a new melody.

  3. 3.

    The Gregory Brothers’ songifications can be found on their YouTube channel Schmojoho.

  4. 4.

    See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtZfW2z9dw.

  5. 5.

    See https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=bFEoMO0pc7k.

  6. 6.

    For examples of such memes, see Prakash (2016).

  7. 7.

    Pavert was already known under the name LuckyTV for providing short news spoofs that were regularly broadcasted during the closing sequences of the daily Dutch TV talk show De Wereld Draait Door.

  8. 8.

    For an extended analysis of the remix “Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton ‘Time of My Life,’” see Brøvig-Hanssen and Sinnreich (forthcoming 2020).

  9. 9.

    See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB2zoidUeLU.

  10. 10.

    DWDD’s posting of the video has already had 3 million views, but the fact that the video is also posted on other YouTube channels makes it difficult to total the views (for example, YouTube channel ReChemical indicates that the remix video has gained 4.1 million views there).

  11. 11.

    See Brøvig-Hanssen and Sinnreich (forthcoming 2020) for examples of how this is done in several Trump remixes.

  12. 12.

    In fact, Wilkins (the “unintentional singer” of this remix) unsuccessfully filed a lawsuit against the Bob Rivers Show (a Seattle-based radio program), which had produced and published a similar remix of this same clip, and Apple, which agreed to sell it on iTunes, claiming that the remix was guilty of plagiaristic sampling, fraud, and negligence, as she had not given permission for this use or received any form of financial compensation. For more on this, see Wong (2014).

  13. 13.

    In her article on Gregory Brother’s “Bed Intruder Song,” Alexandrina Agloro goes so far as to argue that this songification is an updated version of the racial structures and horrible stereotyping of the traditional coon songs and blackface minstrelsy shows in the early nineteenth and twentieth century (Agloro 2011).

  14. 14.

    This work was partially supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme, project number 262762, and through the research project MASHED, project number 275441.

References

  • Agloro, Alexandrina. 2011. Contemporary Coon Songs and Neo-Minstrels: Auto-Tune the News, Antoine Dodson, and the ‘Bed Intruder Song’. Gnovis Journal 11 (2). http://www.gnovisjournal.org/2011/04/04/contemporary-coon-songs-and-neo-minstrels-auto-tune-the-news-antoine-dodson-and-the-bed-intruder-song/.

  • Arnopp, Jason. 2011. Slipknot: Inside the Sickness, Behind the Masks. London: Ebury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attardo, Salvatore. 2008. A Primer for the Linguistics of Humor. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin. 1991. Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3/4): 293–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, James. 1971 [1776]. An Essay on Laughter, and Ludicrous Composition. In Essays, 583–705. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What Makes Online Content Viral?. Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2): 192–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2007. Postproduction: Culture as Screenplay; How Art Reprograms the World. New York: Lukas et Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brackett, David. 2016. Categorizing Sound: Genre and Twentieth-Century Popular Music. California: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brøvig-Hanssen, Ragnhild. 2016. Justin Bieber Featuring Slipknot: Consumption as Mode of Production. In The Oxford Handbook of Music and Virtuality, ed. Sheila Whiteley and Shara Rambarran, 427–454. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brøvig-Hanssen, Ragnhild, and Paul Harkins. 2012. Contextual Incongruity and Musical Congruity: The Aesthetics and Humour in Mash-Ups. Popular Music 31 (1): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brøvig-Hanssen, Ragnhild, and Aram Sinnreich. forthcoming 2020. Do You Wanna Build a Wall? Remix Tactics in the Age of Trump. Popular Music and Society 43 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Covach, John. 1990. The Rutles and the Use of Specific Models in Musical Satire. Indiana Theory Review 11: 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Stylistic Competencies, Musical Humor, and ‘This is Spinal Tap’. In Concert Music, Rock and Jazz Since 1945: Essays and Analytical Studies, ed. Elizabeth W. Marvin and Richard Hermann, 402–424. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Fede, Corella. 2014. The Case of Antoine Dodson and the Limits of Sampling as Transcultural and Cross-Class Expression. In Sampling Media, ed. David Laderman and Laurel Westrup, 212–227. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, William E. B. 2003 [1903]. The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Asbjørn Ø. 2016. A Taxonomy of Humor in Instrumental Music. Journal of Musicological Research 35 (3): 233–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Owen. 2018. Reclaiming Critical Remix Video: The Role of Sampling in Transformative Works. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, Henry. 1991. Psychology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graban, Tarez Samra. 2008. Beyond ‘Wit and Persuasion’: Rhetoric, Composition, and Humor Studies. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 399–447. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, David J. 2016. Of Remixology: Ethics and Aesthetics after Remix. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. 2000. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard, Sören. 1987. Concluding Unscientific Postscript. In The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor, ed. John Morreall, 83–89. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Virginia. 2017. Remix in the Age of Trump. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 7 (2/3): 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderman, David, and Laurel Westrup, eds. 2014. Sampling Media. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matyszczyk, Chris. 2016. The Trump-Clinton Video You’ll Watch for the Next Few Days. C-Net, October 10. https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-clinton-debate-set-to-music-dirty-dancing/.

  • McGranahan, Liam. 2010. Mashnography: Creativity, Consumption, and Copyright in the Mashup Community. PhD diss., Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, Jonathan. 2012. A History of Subversive Remix Video Before YouTube: Thirty Political Video Mashups Made between World War II and 2005. In Fan/Remix Video, ed. Francesca Coppa and Julie Levin Russo, special issue, Transformative Works and Cultures 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, John. 2008. Philosophy and Religion. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 211–242. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Navas, Eduardo, Owen Gallagher, and xtine burrough, eds. 2015. The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, Alleen Pace, and Don L.F. Nilsen. 2008. Literature and Humor. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 243–280. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oring, Elliott. 1989. Between Jokes and Tales: On the Nature of Punch Lines. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 2 (4): 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, Joseph E., Regina Lewis, Lynne Mobilio, David Perry, and Niranjan Raman. 2004. Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along Email. Journal of Advertising Research 44 (4): 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, Neha. 2016. We Can’t Stop Laughing at These Hillary Clinton–Donald Trump Karaoke Memes. Teen Vogue, October 10. http://www.teenvogue.com/story/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-karaoke-memes-presidential-debate.

  • Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, Willibald. 2008. Psychology of Humor. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 17–100. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1957 [1819]. The World as Will and Idea, Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovsky, Victor. 1989. Art as Technique. In The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, ed. David H. Richter, 774–784. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnreich, Aram. 2010. Mashed Up: Music, Technology, and the Rise of Configurable Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spata, Christopher. 2016. Sing ‘Time of My Life’ during the Presidential Debate. Complex, October 11. http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2016/10/trump-hillary-time-of-my-life.

  • Stryker, Sam. 2016. Need A Laugh? This Video of Hillary and Donald Singing ‘Time of My Life’ Should Do It. BuzzFeed, October 11. https://www.buzzfeed.com/samstryker/time-of-my-life-clinton-trump?utm_term=.bpbjvRy8l#.tqDkrn0Pq.

  • Suls, Jerry M. 1972. A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons. In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. Jeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Triezenberg, Katrina. 2004. Humor Enhancers in the Study of Humorous Literature. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 17 (4): 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, Thomas C. 1998. A Theory of Humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 11 (2): 161–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Charles. 2013. I Am Charles Ramsey and Sweet Brown: ‘You Do What You Have to Do’ and ‘Aint Nobody Got Time for Dat’. Huffington Post, October 10. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/reverend-charles-e-williams-iii/i-am-charles-ramsey-and-s_b_3248502.html.

  • Wong, Jamie. 2014. Unintentional Singers: Auto-Tuning Everyday Speech on YouTube. Paper presented at the 9th Art of Record Production Conference, University of Oslo, December 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijderveld, Anton. 1982. Reality in a Looking-Glass: Rationality through an Analysis of Traditional Folly. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ragnhild Brøvig-Hanssen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brøvig-Hanssen, R. (2019). Humor’s Role in Mashups and Remixes: Similarities Between Humor Structure and Remix Structure. In: Braae, N., Hansen, K. (eds) On Popular Music and Its Unruly Entanglements. Pop Music, Culture and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18099-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics