Skip to main content

Memorials and Memorialisation: History, Forms, and Affects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Memorials in the Aftermath of Armed Conflict

Abstract

The construction of memorials is a well-established cultural practice, widely recognised and expected. We hear about them; how they are planned, designed, debated, altered, and sometimes removed. They are celebrated, inaugurated, and critiqued; and they become the focal point for anniversaries and forms of memorialisation through which accounts of events are staged. Memorials have become a part of our cultural toolkit. It is taken for granted that major events need memorials, and it has also become commonplace to see such memorials being recast and reinterpreted to suit changing social conditions and needs including the vagaries of ideologies. On our TV screens, we have witnessed the removal of statues of leading communist figures, first from countries within the former communist bloc of Eastern Europe and then throughout the former Soviet Union. More recently, the removal of the Rhodes statue from the University of Cape Town in 2015 not only became internationally debated through the Internet, it also inspired similar claims against monuments elsewhere. In various ways, memorials and memorialisation activities are attracting attention, and they often provide a confused mix of genuine emotive involvement, political propaganda, and media interests. It is within this complex node of interconnections that the raison d’être for this volume is to be found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    #Rhodes Must Fall

  2. 2.

    There is a distinct trend towards ever wider inclusion. In June 2015, a Memorial to the warhorses shipped from Hampshire during World War One was unveiled in Romsey, England. A fundraising drive to create a memorial in ‘tribute to all the animals that served, suffered and died alongside the British, Commonwealth and Allied forces in the wars and conflicts of the 20th century’ financed ‘The Animals in War Memorial’ now standing at the edge of Hyde Park, London. While the fund is now closed their website is maintained by the British ‘War Memorials Trust’ (http://www.animalsinwar.org.uk/).

  3. 3.

    Such blanket pardons predictably result in substantial debates; these include interesting tensions between historians’ insistence that history should not be tampered with (i.e. warning against the distortion of historical facts) and relatives’ demand for injustices to be redressed. (e.g. through rhetoric like: I personally haven’t got final closure. I will only get that when Bernard’s name is on the role of honour in the cathedral of his home town of Derry, in Northern Ireland, and on the war memorial in Derry, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4797969.stm, consulted 24 November 2016.)

  4. 4.

    See, for instance, several of the memorials created for the centenary of World War One, from the famous 2014 ‘Blood Swept Lands and Sea of Red’ memorial installation at the Tower of London, to the RBL online initiative ‘Every Man Remembered’, and the ‘We Are Here’ Somme tribute in British train stations for the centenary of the battle on 1 July 2016. See http://www.hrp.org.uk/tower-of-london/history-and-stories/tower-of-london-remembers/about-the-installation/; http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/remembrance/ww1-centenary/every-man-remembered/; https://becausewearehere.co.uk/

  5. 5.

    https://victorianstudiescentre.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/a-sore-sight-britains-crumbling-crimean-memorials-and-the-campaign-to-restore-them/, consulted 24 November 2016.

  6. 6.

    Synthesising Brooks, Olick writes: ‘[A] “usable past” is thus an invention or at least a retrospective reconstruction to serve the needs of the present’ (Olick 2007:19).

  7. 7.

    Sidney Herbet was Secretary at War during the Crimean War and a close ally of Nightingale.

  8. 8.

    The original epitaph was engraved on a commemorative stone placed on top of the burial mound. It has not survived, but the epitaph was engraved on a new stone in 1955. There is some dispute about whether the epitaph is actually attributable to Simonides (Molyneux 1992: 183f); but this has not affected the almost mythological status of this attribution in popular presentations, and references to Simonides and Thermopylae are plentiful including in travel writing.

  9. 9.

    For a detailed discussion see Vandiver 2011: 10ff.

  10. 10.

    Except Italy which entered the war in 1915, so that the conflict there is known as ‘la Guerra ’15-’18’.

  11. 11.

    ‘Mort pour la France’ is the ritualised response after each name has been read out during the Armistice Day ceremonies (see e.g. Prost 2002).

  12. 12.

    A famous Polish architect who is now considered to never have been properly recognised by the West.

Bibliography

  • Amat, J.-P., P. Filippucci, and E. Savoret. 2015. The Cemetery of France: Reconstruction and Memorialization on the Battlefield of Verdun (France). In War and Cultural Heritage. Biographies of Place, ed. M.L.S. Sørensen and D. Viejo-Rose, 46–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. 2006. Memory, Individual and Collective. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, ed. R.E. Goodin and C. Tilly, 210–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Transformations Between History and Memory. Social Research 8 (1): 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J. 2008b. Communicative and Cultural Memory. In Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, ed. A. Erll and A. Nünning, 109–118. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. 1974. Symbols, Song, Dance and Features of Articulation: Is Religion an Extreme form of Traditional Authority? European Journal of Sociology 15: 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carly, R. 2010. Silent Witness: Rachel Whiteread’s Nameless Library. Idea Journal Interior Ecologies: 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J., and P. Carman. 2006. Bloody Meadows: Investigating Landscapes of Battle. Stroud: The History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G. 2012. Examining the Memorialscape of Occupation and Liberation: A Case Study from the Channel Islands. International Journal of Heritage Studies 18 (2): 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. 2013. Empires of the Dead. How One Man’s Vision Led to the Creation of WWI’s War Graves. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. 2006. Women on the Columns of Trajan and Marcus and the Visual Language of Roman Victory. In Representations of War in Ancient Rome, ed. S. Dillon and K.E. Welch, 244–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, E. 2010. Memorial Mania. Public Feelings in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, J.R., ed. 1994. Commemorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, W. 1965. The Hot Gates and Other Occasional Pieces. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, A. 1989. Lutyens’s Cenotaph. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 48 (1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Adrian. 1994. The Silence of Memory: Armistice Day, 1919–1946 (Legacy of the Great War). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwach, M. 1950. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. The Collective Memory. New York: Harper & Row Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C.A., C. Leimer, and J. Lowery. 1997. Spontaneous Memorialization: Violent Death and Emerging Mourning Ritual. Omega 35 (2): 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibberd, D., and J. Onions. 2008. The Winter of the World. Poems of the Great War. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. 2003. Present Pasts. Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, G.B. 1919. The Glorious Dead Cenotaph in Whitehall. Ashburton Guardian, October 31, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, T.W. 1994. Memory and Naming in the Great War. In Commemorations, ed. J.R. Gillis, 150–167. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Work of the Dead. A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D.W. 1998. Battlefield Tourism. Pilgrimage and Commemoration of the Great War in Britain, Australia and Canada 1919–1939. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Login, E. 2012. War Memorials in Sedan and Metz: The Evolution of War Memorialization on Eastern France. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 17 (3): 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margry, J.A., and C. Sánchez-Carretero. 2011. Grassroots Memorials. The Politics of Memorializing Traumatic Death. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, J.H. 1992. Simonides: A Historical Study. Wauconda: Bolchazy-Carducci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/feb/05/britain-holocaust-memorial-shortlist-victoria-tower-gardens-london?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other consulted 6 February 2017.

  • Mosse, G.L. 1990. Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murwaska-Muthesius, K. 2002. Oskar Hansen and the Auschwitz ‘Countermemorial,’ 1958–59. In ARTMARGINS, www.artmargins.com/index.php/featured-articles/311-oskar-hansen-and-the-auschwitz-qcountermemorialq-1958-59

  • Nora, P. 1984–1992. Les Lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations 26: 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J.K. 2007. From Useable Pasts to the Return of the Repressed. Hedgehog Review 9 (2, Summer): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prost, A. 2002. War Memorials of the Great War: Monuments to the Fallen. In Republican Identities in War and Peace. Representations of France in the 19th and 20th Century, ed. A. Prost, 11–34. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahovic, D., and D. Zulumovic. 2015. Changing Meaning of Second World War Monuments in Post-Dayton Bosnia Herzegovina: A Case Study of the Kozara Monument and Memorial Complex. In War and Cultural Heritage. Biographies of Place, ed. M.L.S. Sørensen and D. Viejo-Rose, 208–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D.J. 1999. The Construction of Memory in Interwar France. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, M.L.S., and I. Adriansen. 2015. Dybbøl: The Construction and Reconstruction of a Memorial Landscape. In War and Cultural Heritage. Biographies of Place, ed. M.L.S. Sørensen and D. Viejo-Rose, 18–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, E. 2011. Stand in the Trench, Achilles: Classical Receptions in British Poetry of the Great War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, K. 2008. Under the Shadow of Defeat: The War 1870–71 in French Memory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Viejo-Rose, D. 2011 October. Memorial Functions: Intent, Impact and the Right to Remember. Memory Studies 4 (4): 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Geoffrey M. 2016. Memorializing Pearl Harbor. Unfinished Histories and the Work of Remembrance. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. 1998. Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Sites of Memory and the Shadow of War. In Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, ed. A. Erll and A. Nüning, 61–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J., and E. Sivan. 1999. Setting the Framework. In War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century, ed. J. Winter and E. Sivan, 6–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Louise Stig Sørensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sørensen, M.L.S., Viejo-Rose, D., Filippucci, P. (2019). Memorials and Memorialisation: History, Forms, and Affects. In: Sørensen, M., Viejo-Rose, D., Filippucci, P. (eds) Memorials in the Aftermath of Armed Conflict. Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18091-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics