Efficiency of the Bosnian-Herzegovinian Economy

  • Vjekoslav DomljanEmail author
  • Ivana Domljan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 76)


The aim of this paper is to analyse the issue of efficiency its components for Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH) and a group of its comparator countries.

We estimate a global production/efficiency frontier and a frontier for small Central and South East European countries (comparator countries) from 1950 to 2014 and from 1996 to 2014 respectively.

The KWH (“Kumbhakar-Wang-Horncastle”) decomposition of efficiency using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) is applied to the respective countries to evaluate the effects of changes in efficiency. Comparing the efficiency of comparator countries and BIH, and recognizing country heterogeneity, we examine whether there is the evidence of efficiency convergence, i.e. whether BIH moves toward the respective efficiency frontier.

According to our research, BIH is lagging behind some comparator countries (Switzerland, Austria, Slovenia and Macedonia) after the global crises of 2007.


Cobb-Douglas parametric frontier model Efficiency Bosnia and Herzegovina 


  1. 1.
    Caselli, F.: Accounting for cross-country in come differences. NBER Working Paper No. 10828 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdelkader, K., et al.: Bosnia and Herzegovina: selected issues, IMF Country Report No. 10/347 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R., Timmer, M.P.: The next generation of the Penn World Table. Am. Econ. Rev. 105(10), 3150–3182 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jorgenson, D.W., Vu, K.: Information technology and the world economy. Scand. J. Econ. 107(4), 631–650 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aigner, D., Lovel Knox, C.A., Schmidth, P.: Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometrics 21(1), 21–37 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Battese, G.E., Coelli, T.J.: A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20(2), 325–332 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green, W.: Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. J. Prod. Anal. 23(1), 7–32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumbhakar, S.C., Lien, G., Hardaker, J.B.: Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming. J. Prod. Anal. 41(2), 321–337 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colombi, R., Kumbhakar, S.C., Martini, G., Vittadini, G.: Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency. J. Prod. Anal. 42(2), 123–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumbhakar, C.S., Wang, H.-J., Horncastle, P.A.: Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata. Cambridge University Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barro, R.J., Lee, J.W.: A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J. Dev. Econ. 104(2013), 184–198 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dougherty, C.: Introduction to Econometrics. Oxford University Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SSST SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.University of MostarMostarBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations