Advertisement

The Influence of Shock Disinfection on Durability of Internal Water Supply

  • Mario KrzykEmail author
  • Darko Drev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 76)

Abstract

Water supply is a potentially exposed to bacterial contamination when it is newly constructed or re-introduced. It must pass tests for chlorine concentration and coliform absence before being put into use. Shock chlorination is usually performed preventively. This is a process of disinfecting internal water supply or plumbing systems by circulating a concentrated chlorine solution throughout the system. Shock disinfection is intended to destroy pathogenic microorganisms. During its implementation very aggressive conditions are present. Under these conditions various metals dissolve, which can cause serious damage to the internal water supply network. Before shock disinfection is carried out it is necessary to assess how it should be applied so that disinfection will be successful without damaging the plumbing installation. Carrying out shock disinfection should take into account all the microorganisms to be destroyed and the materials used that are more or less susceptible to corrosion.

Keywords

Shock disinfection Internal water supply Corrosion 

References

  1. 1.
    Rules on Drinking Water, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 19/04, 35/04, 26/06, 92/06, 25/09, 74/15, and 51/17, in Slovene: Pravilnik o pitnivodi,Uradni list RS, št. 19/04, 35/04, 26/06, 92/06, 25/09, 74/15 in 51/17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Instructions for the Water Supply System Disinfection, in Slovene: Navodilo za izvedbodezinfekcijevodovodnegaomrežja, NIJZ – Center za zdravstvenoekologijo, 19 November 2015Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    White, G.C.: Handbook of Chlorination and Alternative Disinfectants. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shi, X., Xie, N., Gong, J.: Recent progress in the research on microbially influenced corrosion: a bird’s eye view through the engineering lens. Recent Pat. Corros. Sci. 118–131 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghali, E.: Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys: Understanding, Performance, and Testing. Wiley, Canada (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Moura, M.C., Pontual, E.V., Paiva, P.M.G., Coelho, L.C.B.B.: An outline to corrosive bacteria. In: Méndez-Vilas, A. (ed.) Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating them: Science, Technology and Education (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerr, C.J., Osborn, K.S., Robson, G.D., Handley, P.S.: The relationship between pipe material and biofilm formation in a laboratory model system. J. Appl. Microbiol. Symp. Suppl. 85, 29S–39S (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05280.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stout, J.E., Best, M.G., Yu, V.L.: Susceptibility of members of the family Legionellaceae to thermal stress: implications for heat eradication methods in water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 396–399 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Geodetic EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations