Advertisement

Flatness Measurement on a Coordinate Measuring Machine

  • Nermina Zaimovic-UzunovicEmail author
  • Samir Lemes
  • Dzenana Tomasevic
  • Josip Kacmarcik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 76)

Abstract

Different aspects of surface measurement strategies on Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) were varied and their influence on the flatness deviation result was investigated. The CMM measurements were conducted using single point and continuous scanning probing. The measurements were performed with five different point densities in rectangular grid sampling strategies and three different probe styli. The results showed a very significant influence of a sampling size on a flatness deviation measurement result.

Keywords

Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) Flatness Sampling Measurement strategy 

References

  1. 1.
    Pereira, P.H.: Cartesian coordinate measuring machines. In: Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems, 2nd edn., pp. 57–79. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flack, D.: CMM Measurement Strategies, Measurement Good Practice Guide 41. National Physical Laboratory (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raghunandan, R., Rao, P.V.: Selection of sampling points for accurate evaluation of flatness error using coordinate measuring machine. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 202(1–3), 240–245 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raghunandan, R., Rao, P.V.: Selection of an optimum sample size for flatness error estimation while using coordinate measuring machine. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47(3–4), 477–482 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakota, S., Görög, A.: Flatness measurement by multi-point methods and by scanning methods. AD ALTA J. Interdiscip. Res. 1(1), 124–127 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jalid, A., Hariri, S., Laghzale, N.E.: Influence of sample size on flatness estimation and uncertainty in three-dimensional measurement. Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 6(1), 102 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capello, E., Semeraro, Q.: The harmonic fitting method for the assessment of the substitute geometry estimate error. Part I: 2D and 3D theory. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41(8), 1071–1102 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capello, E., Semeraro, Q.: The harmonic fitting method for the assessment of the substitute geometry estimate error. Part II: statistical approach, machining process analysis and inspection plan optimization. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41(8), 1103–1129 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henke, R.P., Summerhays, K.D., Baldwin, J.M., Cassou, R.M., Brown, C.W.: Methods for evaluation of systematic geometric deviations in machined parts and their relationships to process variables. Precis. Eng. 23(4), 273–292 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Summerhays, K.D., Henke, R.P., Baldwin, J.M., Cassou, R.M., Brown, C.W.: Optimizing discrete point sample patterns and measurement data analysis on internal cylindrical surfaces with systematic form deviations. Precis. Eng. 26(1), 105–121 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colosimo, B.M., Moya, E.G., Moroni, G., Petro, S.: Statistical sampling strategies for geometric tolerance inspection by CMM. Econ. Qual. Control 23(1), 109–121 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zaimovic-Uzunovic, N., Lemes, S.: Cylindricity Measurement on a Coordinate Measuring Machine. Advances in Manufacturing, pp. 825–835. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weckenmann, A., Estler, T., Peggs, G., McMurtry, D.: Probing systems in dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 53(2), 657–684 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 1101:2017: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Geometrical tolerancing - Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 12781-2:2011: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Flatness - Part 2: Specification operators (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shakarji, C.M.: Coordinate measuring systems algorithms and filters. In: Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems, 2nd edn., pp. 153–182. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strbac, B., Hadzistevic, M., Klobucar, R., Acko, B.: The effect of sampling strategy on the equation of a reference plane measured on a CMM. In: Proceedings of 10th Research/Expert Conference with International Participation, QUALITY 2017, Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ZEISS, ZEISS CONTURA: The Reference Machine in the Compact Class. https://www.zeiss.com/metrology/products/systems/bridge-type-cmms/contura.html. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
  19. 19.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nermina Zaimovic-Uzunovic
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samir Lemes
    • 1
  • Dzenana Tomasevic
    • 1
  • Josip Kacmarcik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ZenicaZenicaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations