Abstract
Decision-making is an important task in diverse fields and the used mechanisms often have a long tradition. This article describes situations from voting, scheduling a meeting, and online participation where collective decisions have to be taken. In all these fields digitization offers new possibilities that are not yet fully used. A task for the future is to use this potential in order to improve decision-making from various points of view.
Supported in part by the DFG-grant BA6270/1-1.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baujard, A., Igersheim, H., Lebon, I., Gavrel, F., & Laslier, J.-F. (2014). Who’s favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election. Electoral Studies, 34, 131–145.
Baujard, A., Blanch, R., Bouveret, S., Igersheim, H., Laruelle, A., Laslier, J.-F., et al. (2017). Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation “VOTER AUTREMENT” lors du premier tour de l’élection présidentielle française le 23 avril 2017 à Allevard-les-Bains, Crolles, Grenoble, Hérouville-Saint-Clair, Strasbourg et sur internet. Technical report. In French.
Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., & Procaccia, A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conitzer, V., & Walsh, T. (2016). Barriers to manipulation in voting. In F. Brandt, V. Conitzer, U. Endriss, J. Lang, & A. Procaccia (Eds.), Handbook of computational social choice (pp. 127–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doodle. (2017). https://help.doodle.com/customer/portal/articles/761313-what-is-doodle-and-how-does-it-work-an-introduction. Retrieved 22 Sept 2017.
Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., & Talmon, N. (2017). Multiwinner voting: A new challenge for social choice theory. In U. Endriss (Ed.), Trends in computational social choice. AI Access Foundation. To appear.
Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L., & Rothe, J. (2014). The complexity of online manipulation of sequential elections. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(4), 697–710.
Krauthoff, T., Betz, G., Baurmann, M., & Mauve, M. (2016). Dialog-based online argumentation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 33–40). IOS Press.
Krauthoff, T., Meter, C., & Mauve, M. (2017). Dialog-based online argumentation: Findings from a field experiment. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings AI*IA Series. To appear.
Whale. (2017). http://strokes.imag.fr/whale4/polls/viewPoll/00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000000. Retrieved 22 Sept 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baumeister, D. (2019). The Future of Decision-Making. In: Laslier, JF., Moulin, H., Sanver, M., Zwicker, W. (eds) The Future of Economic Design. Studies in Economic Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18049-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18050-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)