Skip to main content

Intelligence Failures, Militarization, and Rehabilitation: The Anti-Terrorist Campaign After the Chittagong Armoury Raid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 195 Accesses

Part of the book series: Britain and the World ((BAW))

Abstract

This chapter analyzes how the Bengal revolutionaries’ escalation of their anticolonial campaign in the early 1930s led to the deployment of new anti-terrorist strategies by colonial authorities. The Chittagong Armoury Raid of April 1930 demonstrated the revolutionaries’ capacity to carry out more ambitious attacks on colonial officials and institutions. The revolutionaries’ renewed campaign of violence also created a sense of panic on the part of the white community in Bengal, who demanded summary justice and reprisals. In response to the surge in revolutionary activity, British and Indian Army troops were stationed in key districts of the province, and military officers (known as Military Intelligence Officers) bolstered the ranks of the Intelligence Branch. The militarization of the counter-terrorist campaign and the issues of civil-military cooperation that they raised anticipated colonial counter-insurgency campaigns following the Second World War. At the same time as colonial authorities came to rely more extensively on the military in the policing of the revolutionaries, they simultaneously intensified efforts to “reform” and “rehabilitate” many of the thousands of terrorist suspects detained during these years in an effort to eliminate the threat of revolutionary violence in Bengal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Michele L. Louro and Carolien Stolte, “The Meerut Conspiracy Case in Comparative and International Perspective,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 33: 3 (2013), 310–315.

  2. 2.

    Kama Maclean, “The History of a Legend: Accounting for Popular Histories of Revolutionary Nationalism in India,” Modern Asian Studies 46: 6 (2012), 1540–1571.

  3. 3.

    H. W. Hale, Terrorism in India 1917–1936 (1937; Reprint: Delhi: Deep, 1974).

  4. 4.

    Extracts from Weekly Report of Director, Intelligence Bureau, GOI, 14 December 1930, L/P&J/12/389, APAC BL.

  5. 5.

    Another group of insurgents, who had planned to shoot Britons at the local European Club, were frustrated in their attempt. The club was empty, except for an Indian bearer, due to the fact that the raid took place late on the evening of Good Friday. The account of the Armoury Raid here is, unless otherwise noted, based on information in Manini Chatterjee, Do and Die: The Chittagong Uprising 1930–34 (Delhi: Penguin, 1999); and R. E. A. Ray, “Report on the Activities of Terrorists in Bengal during the Period April to December 1930,” (1931) in TIB I: 593–758.

  6. 6.

    The revolutionaries who took control of the police armory also neglected to send reinforcements to the group who had seized the Auxiliary Force armory, which contained rifles and Lewis guns. In addition, revolutionaries who could have taken over other key locales in the town wasted hours at the police armory until, lacking other orders, they retreated to the hills around Chittagong.

  7. 7.

    “Report of the Adjutant, A. B. Railways. Report of the Raid on the night 18th/19th April 1930,” in I. Mallikarjuna Sharma, ed., Easter Rebellion in India: The Chittagong Uprising (Hyderabad: Marxist Study Forum, 1993), 391.

  8. 8.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Report on the Activities of Terrorists in Bengal during the Period April to December 1930,” (1931) in TIB I: 601.

  9. 9.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Report on the Activities of Terrorists in Bengal during the Period April to December 1930,” (1931) in TIB I: 657.

  10. 10.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Note on the Policy of the Terrorist Parties in Bengal,” (1932) in TIB I: 745.

  11. 11.

    Robert Reid, Years of Change in Bengal and Assam (London: Ernest Benn, 1966), 53.

  12. 12.

    Kama Maclean, A Revolutionary History of Interwar India: Violence, Image, Voice and Text (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).

  13. 13.

    Mark Condos, The Insecurity State: Punjab and the Making of Colonial Power in British India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).

  14. 14.

    Report on the Political Situation in Bengal, First Half of May 1930, L/P&J/12/13, APAC BL.

  15. 15.

    Hale, Terrorism in India, 34.

  16. 16.

    Extracts from the Weekly Report of the Director, Intelligence Bureau, GOI, 17 December 1931, L/P&J/12/391, APAC BL. For the perspectives of female revolutionaries, see Durba Ghosh, “Revolutionary Women and Nationalist Heroes in Bengal, 1930 to the 1980s,” Gender & History 25: 2 (2013), 355–375.

  17. 17.

    “Addenda to the List of Outrages,” in TIB VI: 667–701.

  18. 18.

    Charles Tegart was again the target of the Writers’ Building attack. For details, see TIB VI: 667–701.

  19. 19.

    L. G. Pinnell, “Political and Administrative,” Pinnell Papers, MSS Eur. D 911/21, APAC BL.

  20. 20.

    The colonial debates surrounding and the application of the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance of 1924 and the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Acts of 1925 and 1930 are analyzed in Durba Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists: Political Violence and the Colonial State in India, 1919–1947 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 107–134 and 145–160. The focus here will be on the intersection between police intelligence and preventive detention.

  21. 21.

    In 1926, the Governor of Bengal wrote to the Viceroy that Calcutta Police Commissioner Charles Tegart “urged very strongly the moral effect of a permanent measure.” Three years later the police again conveyed the view that the legislation ought to remain permanent. Hugh Stephenson, Acting Governor of Bengal, to Viceroy, 9 August 1926, L/PO/6/25 APAC BL; and “Memorandum on the History of Terrorism in Bengal 1905–1933,” (1933) in TIB I: 813.

  22. 22.

    The GOB estimated that “75 per cent. of the men arrested had at one stage or another given their full story.” Hugh Stephenson, Acting Governor of Bengal, to Viceroy, 9 August 1926, L/PO/6/25 APAC BL.

  23. 23.

    Hugh Stephenson, Acting Governor of Bengal, to Viceroy, 9 August 1926, L/PO/6/25 APAC BL.

  24. 24.

    “Terrorist Conspiracy in Bengal from the 1st January to 30th June 1926” (1926), “Terrorist Conspiracy in Bengal from the 1st July to 31st December 1926,” (1927), and “Terrorist Conspiracy in Bengal from the 1st January to 30th June 1927,” (1928) in TIB I: 477–592.

  25. 25.

    Calcutta Police Commissioner Charles Tegart regarded Chittagong and Dacca as the two districts which posed the greatest threat of terrorist violence. Lord Irwin, Viceroy, to Lord Birkenhead, Sec. of State for India, Private, 16 June 1927, L/PO/6/25, APAC BL.

  26. 26.

    H. J. Twynam and R. E. A. Ray, Enquiry into Temporary Establishments of the Central and District Intelligence Branches of the Bengal Police (1936), 31; and Rajat Kanta Ray, Social Conflict and Political Unrest in Bengal, 1875–1927 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984), 298–299 and 301.

  27. 27.

    “Activities of the Revolutionaries in Bengal from 1st September 1924 to the 31st March 1925,” (1925) in TIB I: 375.

  28. 28.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 62–63.

  29. 29.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Report on the Activities of Terrorists in Bengal during the Period April to December 1930,” (1931) in TIB I: 603.

  30. 30.

    Cited in Chatterjee, Do and Die, 64.

  31. 31.

    “Judgment in Armoury Raid Case No. 1 of 1930. Chittagong. In the Court of the Commissioner of Special Tribunal. The Emperor v. Subodh Bose and others,” 12–13, 1 March 1932, GOI Home (Pol) 7/4 of 1932, NAI.

  32. 32.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 64.

  33. 33.

    “Judgment in Emperor v. Surjya Kumar Sen, alias Masterda; Tarakeswar Dastidar; Kalpana Datta,” p. 19, 14 August 1933, Sharpe Papers, CSAS.

  34. 34.

    Douglas Gordon, “Memoirs of Life as a Police Officer in India from 1907–59,” 111, Gordon Papers, CSAS.

  35. 35.

    “The watchers,” as Manini Chatterjee observes, “were no skillful detectives, stalking their quarry in shadowy silence. They openly hung about the listed ‘haunts,’ making no effort to conceal that they were on duty.” Chatterjee, Do and Die, 64.

  36. 36.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 65–67.

  37. 37.

    Cited in Chatterjee, Do and Die, 159.

  38. 38.

    Extract from diaries of W. D. R. Prentice, 13 and 15 May 1930, and note by Prentice, 16 May 1930, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 580 of 1930, WBSA.

  39. 39.

    J. C. Farmer, DIG, Backergunge Range, to F. Lowman, IG, 6 May 1930, GOI Home (Poll) No. 335 of 1930, NAI.

  40. 40.

    Sugata Bose, Agrarian Bengal: Economy, Social Structure and Politics 1919–1947 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 199.

  41. 41.

    Sumit Sarkar, Modern India 1885–1947 (Delhi: Macmillan, 1983), 301–302.

  42. 42.

    “List of Outrages Committed in Pursuance of the Civil Disobedience Movement in 1930,” in TIB VI: 701–714.

  43. 43.

    J. R. Johnson, SP Chittagong, to A. H. Kemm, DM Chittagong, 24 August 1931, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 (76–80) of 1931, WBSA.

  44. 44.

    H. R Wilkinson, DM Chittagong, to GOB, 30 July 1930, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 670 of 1930, WBSA.

  45. 45.

    Commander, Presidency and Assam District, to CS to GOB, 16 May 1930, in Sharma, ed., Easter Rebellion in India, 430–433.

  46. 46.

    Dallas Smith to Lowman, 4 May 1930, GOI Home (Pol) Conf. No. 335 of 1930, NAI.

  47. 47.

    Dallas Smith requested a plane, “bomber for choice,” which he believed would be invaluable E. Dallas Smith, Commanding Special Duty Detachment, Eastern Frontier Rifles, to Commandant, EFR, 21 April 1930, in Sharma, ed., Easter Rebellion in India, 396–397.

  48. 48.

    Report on the Political Situation in Bengal, Second Half of April 1930, L/P&J/12/13, APAC BL; and Lt.-Col. E. Dallas Smith, Assam Rifles, to Lowman, IG Police; and J. R. Johnson to Lowman; IG Police, Home (Pol) Conf. No. 335 of 1930, NAI.

  49. 49.

    E. Dallas Smith to Lowman, 6 May 1930; and J. C. Farmer to Lowman, 6 May 1930; GOI Home (Pol) No. 335 of 1930, NAI.

  50. 50.

    Tanika Sarkar, Bengal 1928–1934: The Politics of Protest (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987), 150 and 152–153.

  51. 51.

    Farmer to Lowman, 6 May 1930, GOI Home (Pol) 335 of 1930, NAI; and Santimoy Roy, The Revolutionary Nationalist Movement: Its Contribution to India’s Freedom Struggle (Calcutta: Antaranga Prakashana, 1993), 175–176.

  52. 52.

    J. R. Johnson, SP Chittagong, to Farmer, IG, 9 April 1931; and A. H. Kemm, DM, to Commissioner, Chittagong Division, 14 April 1931; GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 of 1931, WBSA.

  53. 53.

    H. W. Emerson, “Note on Discussion with Bengal Government,” 5 November 1931, P&J No. 5172 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  54. 54.

    G. C. B. Buckland, Lt.-Col., Commanding at Chittagong, to O/C Presidency & Assam District, 8 May 1931, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 of 1931, WBSA.

  55. 55.

    Emphasis in original. J. R. Johnson, SP, Chittagong, to T. J. A. Craig, IG, 25 August 1931, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 of 1931, WBSA.

  56. 56.

    Fortnightly Report for the Second Half of August 1931, L/P&J/12/25, APAC BL.

  57. 57.

    See Chap. 3.

  58. 58.

    R. N. Reid, CS GOB, to Sec. GOI Home, 2 October 1931; A. H. Kemm, DM Chittagong, to Commissioner, Chittagong Division, 1 September 1931; Reid to Sec. to GOI, Home, 2 October 1931; and W. H. Nelson, Report on the Disturbances in Chittagong on August 30th, 1931 and Following Days (1931), 19. P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/220, APAC BL.

  59. 59.

    Suranjan Das, Communal Riots in Bengal, 1905–1947 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1992), 133–141.

  60. 60.

    Report of the Non-official Enquiry Committee on Recent Disturbances in Chittagong (September, 1931), 10. P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/220, APAC BL.

  61. 61.

    Report on the Disturbances in Chittagong, 3–4; Report of the Non-official Enquiry Committee on Recent Disturbances in Chittagong (September, 1931), 2; J. R. Johnson, SP, Chittagong, to T. J. A. Craig, IG, 25 August 1931, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 of 1931, WBSA. Emphasis in original. Johnson concluded that “every young Bengali at the moment is a potential murderer and only requires the necessary amount of the serum propagated by PANCHAJANYA to go to Surjya Sen and get the plan for murder.”

  62. 62.

    Report on the Disturbances in Chittagong, 28.

  63. 63.

    CS to GOB to GOI, Home, 23 January 1932, P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/220, APAC BL.

  64. 64.

    CS to GOB to GOI, Home, 23 January 1932, and “Extracts from Note” attached to the above letter, P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/220, APAC BL.

  65. 65.

    ICS officer John Younie reported that Shooter’s home leave had been abruptly cancelled shortly before his suicide. Dorothy Younie, “In Chittagong Fifty Years Ago,” Aberdeen University Review No. 169 (1983), 35–36.

  66. 66.

    David Campion, “Authority, Accountability and Representation: The United Provinces Police and the Dilemmas of the Colonial Policeman in British India, 1902–39,” Historical Research 76: 192 (2003), 221; and telegram from GOI Home to Sec. of State, 20 March 1932, P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/220, APAC BL.

  67. 67.

    In March 1932 the troops were replaced by a single battalion of Gurkha Rifles. Major A. F. Rawson Lumby, Assistant Sec. to GOI, to Chief of General Staff, 15 August 1932, GOI Home (Pol) No. 33/9 of 1932, NAI.

  68. 68.

    Reid to CS to GOB, 14 December 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  69. 69.

    Reid to CS to GOB, 14 December 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  70. 70.

    A. S. Hands, “Report on the Operations of Chitforce from the 1st December to 7th March 1932,” L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  71. 71.

    Holman recalled that “In due course sensible strategy brought some results. By sensible strategy I mean the old method of, for instance, combing all parts of a given area thoroughly save one. We then went over the deliberately neglected areas in the hope that its apparent immunity from searches had lured in some absconders. It was to work at least once, taking time and many men. In case it all sounds a very expensive way of capturing a few frightened young men it should be mentioned that it was considered essential to recover every one of the stolen arms.” T. G. H. Holman memoirs, 178–179, Holman Papers, MSS Eur. D 884, APAC BL.

  72. 72.

    Minute by R. Peel, IO, 11 March 1932, P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  73. 73.

    E. N. Blandy, Commissioner, Chittagong Division, to Officer Commanding, 7th (Dehra Dun) Infantry Brigade, Dacca, 16 May 1934, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 277 of 1934, WBSA. An estimated one thousand searches were carried out between May 1932 and February 1933 alone. IO Judicial & Public Minute, 18 May 1933, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL. The Chitforce operation claimed credit for the arrest of a “minor absconder” in Dacca in December 1931, due to the pressure that was being brought to bear by revolutionaries in Chittagong. Reid to CS to GOB, 21 December 1931, Weekly Report for Week Ending 19 December 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  74. 74.

    A. S. Hands, “Report on the Operations against Absconders and Terrorists in the Chittagong District from the 9th March 1932 to 31st March 1933,” p. 3, P&J No. 4741 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL. For the Dhalghat raid, see Chatterjee, Do and Die, 211–215.

  75. 75.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 216–224.

  76. 76.

    Extracts from the Weekly Report of the Director, Intelligence Bureau, GOI, 6 October 1932, L/P&J/12/391, APAC BL.

  77. 77.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 218.

  78. 78.

    Maria Misra, Business, Race, and Politics in British India c. 1850–1960 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), 164.

  79. 79.

    Ray, Social Conflict, 25.

  80. 80.

    David Washbrook, “Avatars of Identity: The British Community in India,” in Robert Bickers, ed., Settlers and Expatriates: Britons Over the Seas. The Oxford History of the British Empire Companion Series (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 203.

  81. 81.

    Kim A. Wagner, “’Treading Upon Fires’: The ‘Mutiny’ Motif and Colonial Anxieties in British India,” Past and Present No. 218 (2013), 159–197.

  82. 82.

    In 1908, following a series of assassination attempts, the British-Indian community demanded legislation enabling the colonial government to deal with “revolutionary crime” outside the courts system. Ray, Social Conflict, 181.

  83. 83.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Report on the Activities of Terrorists in Bengal during the period April to December 1930,” (1931) in TIB I: 604.

  84. 84.

    As Mrinalini Sinha argues, the clubs of colonial India were not metropolitan imports, but evolved and functioned in response to the exigencies of the colonial world. “Britishness, Clubability and the Colonial Public Sphere: The Genealogy of an Imperial Institution in Colonial India,” Journal of British Studies 40: 4 (2001), 489–521.

  85. 85.

    “Memorandum on the History of Terrorism in Bengal 1905–1933,” (1933) in TIB I: 821.

  86. 86.

    Kama Maclean, “The Art of Panicking Quietly: British-Indian Responses to ‘Outrages,’ 1928–1933,” in Harald Fischer-Tiné, ed., Anxieties, Fear and Panic in Colonial Settings: Empires on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 140.

  87. 87.

    Harald Fischer-Tiné and Christina Whyte, “Introduction: Empires and Emotions,” in Fischer-Tiné, ed., Anxieties, Fear and Panic, 1.

  88. 88.

    A. S. Hands, Bengal Emergency Powers Ordinance Weekly Report No. 13, for week ending 27 February 1932, 28 February 1932, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  89. 89.

    Amy Bell, “Landscapes of Fear: Wartime London, 1939–1945,” Journal of British Studies 48: 1 (2009), 154.

  90. 90.

    Wagner, “’Treading Upon Fires,’” 159–197. For recurrent British fears of a repeat of 1857, see Chap. 2.

  91. 91.

    R. E. A. Ray, “Note on the Policy of the Terrorist Parties in Bengal,” (1932) in TIB I: 745.

  92. 92.

    Younie, “In Chittagong,” 27.

  93. 93.

    David M. Laushey, Bengal Terrorism and the Marxist Left: Aspects of Regional Nationalism in India, 1905–1942 (Calcutta: Firma KLM, 1975), 79.

  94. 94.

    Alfred Watson, “Terror in Bengal,” in Wilfred Hindle, ed., We Were There: By 12 Foreign Correspondents (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939), 236.

  95. 95.

    H. Quinton, “Terrorism in Bengal – A Memory,” Quinton Collection, CSAS.

  96. 96.

    Coralie Taylor to her parents, 11 September 1933 and 7 November 1933, S. G. Taylor Collection, CSAS.

  97. 97.

    Simon Ball, “The Assassination Culture of Imperial Britain, 1909–1979,” Historical Journal 56: 1 (2013), 233–234 and 255–256.

  98. 98.

    Statesman, 1 August 1931, quoted in Reginald Reynolds, The White Sahibs in India (1937; reprint Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1970), 249.

  99. 99.

    H. W. Emerson, “Notes on Discussion with the Bengal Government,” 5 November 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  100. 100.

    The Times, 15 December 1931.

  101. 101.

    Andrew Thompson, “The Languages of Loyalism in Southern Africa, c. 1870–1939,” English Historical Review 118: 477 (2003), 617–650.

  102. 102.

    “The Royalists. We stand for the King against the King’s Enemies,” [1931], Mullock Collection, CSAS.

  103. 103.

    “The Royalists. We stand for the King against the King’s Enemies,” [1931], Mullock Collection, CSAS.

  104. 104.

    The Times, 15 December 1931. Mullock, along with two other members of the Royalists, had in fact been present at the assassination attempt on Villiers. Garlick had been part of the Special Tribunal which had tried and sentenced Dinesh Gupta to death for the murder of the IG of Jails during the attack on the Writers’ Building.

  105. 105.

    Extract from the Weekly Report of Director, Intelligence Bureau, GOI, 29 October 1931, L/P&J/12/390, APAC BL.

  106. 106.

    Royalist manifesto, 28 October 1931, Mullock Collection, CSAS.

  107. 107.

    Report on the Disturbances in Chittagong, 5. The Indian National Congress’ Report of the Non-official Enquiry Committee also noted the participation of Auxiliary Force members in the destruction of the press. L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  108. 108.

    Untitled memorandum to Government of Bengal from European officials in Dacca [1932], S. G. Taylor Collection, CSAS.

  109. 109.

    Reflecting the fears of assassination by revolutionaries, the authors contended that “In the peculiar condition of Hindu joint family life, it is practically impossible for parents and relatives to be unaware of the revolutionary activities of members of their household, particularly in those cases where revolvers have been kept in the house.” Untitled memorandum to Government of Bengal from European officials in Dacca [1932], S. G. Taylor Collection, CSAS.

  110. 110.

    Mark Condos, “License to Kill: The Murderous Outrages Act and the Rule of Law in Colonial India, 1867–1925,” Modern Asian Studies 50: 2 (2016), 480–481. For other efforts to apply the Murderous Outrages Act to Bengal, see Chap. 2.

  111. 111.

    R. N. Reid, untitled memo, 24 March 1932; and Reid to Prentice, 24 March 1932, Anderson Collection, MSS Eur. F 207/12, APAC BL.

  112. 112.

    Reid to Prentice, 24 March 1932, Anderson Collection, MSS Eur. F 207/12, APAC BL.

  113. 113.

    John Lonsdale, “Kenya: Home County and African Frontier,” in Bickers, ed., Settlers and Expatriates, 104. For the responses of the “extremist” segments of the European community to Mau Mau, see Dane Kennedy, “Constructing the Colonial Myth of Mau Mau,” International Journal of African Historical Studies 25: 2 (1992), 245–247.

  114. 114.

    The Statesman of Calcutta strongly criticized a town hall meeting in which Europeans threatened “to take the law into their own hands.” Statesman, 30 July 1931, cited in Maclean, “The Art of Panicking Quietly,” 154.

  115. 115.

    Alexander Burnett, “Experiences in Chittagong Riots – April 1930,” Alexander Burnett Papers, MSS Eur. C 806, APAC BL.

  116. 116.

    In 1926, for example, infantry, cavalry, and armored cars traveled through Calcutta in the wake of Hindu-Muslim riots “‘as a show of strength to the inhabitants who were unsettled owing to communal riots.’” David Omissi, The Sepoy and the Raj: The Indian Army, 1860–1940 (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan, 1994), 214–215.

  117. 117.

    Omissi, Sepoy and the Raj, 215.

  118. 118.

    David Arnold, “The Armed Police and Colonial Rule in South India, 1914–1947,” Modern Asian Studies 11: 1 (1977), 105–106.

  119. 119.

    Huw Bennett, Fighting the Mau Mau: The British Army and Counter-insurgency in the Kenyan Emergency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 83–107.

  120. 120.

    Omissi, Sepoy and the Raj, 192–231; and Srinath Raghaven, “Protecting the Raj: The Army in India and Internal Security, c. 1919–1939,” Small Wars and Insurgencies 16: 3 (2005), 253–279.

  121. 121.

    Major General Bethell told the GOB that he believed a force of Assam Rifles with two British officers would be adequate for garrison duties in Chittagong. Major J. H. Woods, Presidency and Assam District, to CS to GOB, 18 April 1931; R. M. Wright to T. G. A. Craig, IG, 23 April 1931; and “Note of a discussion on the situation in Chittagong … on May 1, 1931,” GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 296 of 1931, WBSA.

  122. 122.

    H. W. Emerson, “Note on Discussion with the Bengal Government,” 5 November 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  123. 123.

    Reid, Years of Change, 63.

  124. 124.

    Michael Silvestri, Ireland and India: Nationalism, Empire and Memory (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 68–73.

  125. 125.

    H. G. Haig, Viceroy’s Council, to John Anderson, 19 November 1932, Anderson Collection, MSS Eur. F 207/3, APAC BL.

  126. 126.

    Proceedings of the Civil and Military Conference held in Government House, Calcutta, on the 3rd and 4th July 1934, p. 5. L/P&J/12/400, APAC BL.

  127. 127.

    One British, one Garwhali, one Jat, and four Gurkha battalions were initially deployed in the province. Omissi, Sepoy and the Raj, 224.

  128. 128.

    “Instructions regarding the collection of information against terrorists,” 18 November 1932, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 1046 (1–5) of 1932, WBSA.

  129. 129.

    Col. R. B. Deedes, Officiating Brigadier at Kharagpur, to L. B. Burrows, Commissioner, Burdwan Division, 27 April 1934, L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  130. 130.

    “Note prepared for the Army Commander’s visit, dated 28th November 1933,” L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  131. 131.

    Sarkar, Bengal 1928–1934, 137.

  132. 132.

    P. J. Griffiths, DM, Midnapore, to Brigade Commander, 8th (Bareilly) Infantry Brigade, Kharagpur, 14 October 1933, L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  133. 133.

    “Instructions regarding the collection of information against terrorists,” 18 November 1932, Home (Pol) Conf. No. 1046 (1–5) of 1932, WBSA.

  134. 134.

    R. E. A. Ray noted that troops’ activities such as flag marches and even cordoning during searches only made an “indirect” contribution to intelligence-gathering. R. E. A. Ray, “Appreciation of the Terrorist Situation in Bengal, prepared by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Intelligence Branch, C.I.D., for the Conference that is to be held in July, 1934,” p. 12, 28 June 1934, L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  135. 135.

    Proceedings of the Civil and Military Conference held in Government House, Calcutta, on the 3rd and 4th July 1934, pp. 5–6. L/P&J/12/400, APAC BL.

  136. 136.

    Major General George Lindsay, commander of the Presidency and Assam District from 1935 to 1939, subsequently selected officers for appointment as MIOs. “Political and Administrative,” Pinnell Papers, MSS Eur. D 911, APAC BL.

  137. 137.

    In 1936, for example, eight of the twelve Military Intelligence Officers stationed in Bengal had some intelligence background. Two officers’ experience was limited to a British or Indian Army course in intelligence while six had practical experience in army intelligence work in India or Burma. Note by Major J. W. Young, 3 February 1936, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 600 of 1934, WBSA.

  138. 138.

    Proceedings of the Civil and Military Conference held in Government House, Calcutta, on the 3rd and 4th July 1934, p. 22. L/P&J/12/400, APAC BL.

  139. 139.

    Note by E. N. Blandy, Commissioner, Chittagong Division, nd, in “Agenda for discussion at the Civil and Military Conference to be held … on the 3rd July 1934,” p. 43, L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  140. 140.

    Taylor’s wife Coralie wrote that Leonard “is exceptionally good, and has taken a lot of work off Bob’s [Taylor’s] shoulders.” Taylor unsuccessfully tried to persuade Leonard to transfer permanently to the Bengal Police once his term of service ended in 1936. “He is first-class at D.I.B. work, and he is just the type of man we want. But he is too keen on his own job in the Army.” S. G. Taylor, “Note on the anti-terrorist campaign in Mymensingh and the employment of troops in relation thereto,” 21 April 1934, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 277 of 1934, WBSA; Twynam and Ray, Central and District Intelligence Branches, 24; Coralie Taylor to her family, 22 August 1933; and S. G. Taylor to his family, 2 April 1935, Taylor Papers, CSAS.

  141. 141.

    Finney noted, however, that the list only dated back to 1935, when the MIO began compiling history sheets.

  142. 142.

    P. E. S. Finney, “Inspection remarks … on the District Intelligence Branch office, on the 15th, 16th, and 17th Sept, 1936,” p. 5. Finney Papers, CSAS.

  143. 143.

    General Police Arrangements in Connection with the Visit of His Excellency the Governor of Bengal to Rangpur, 31st October to 2nd November, 1936. Finney Papers, CSAS.

  144. 144.

    Chatterjee, Do and Die, 247.

  145. 145.

    John Hunt, Life is Meeting (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1978) 18, 21 and 23.

  146. 146.

    C. A. Bayly, “Knowing the Country: Empire and Information in India,” Modern Asian Studies 27: 1 (1993), 3.

  147. 147.

    Hunt wrote that he “grew to know and love Bengal,” and in his memoir described rural scenes such as “the fishermen casting their circular nets over a flooded paddy field.” Hunt, Life is Meeting, 25–26.

  148. 148.

    Hunt, Life is Meeting, 18.

  149. 149.

    Proceedings of the Civil and Military Conference held in Government House, Calcutta, on the 3rd and 4th July 1934, p. 23. L/P&J/12/400, APAC BL.

  150. 150.

    In spite of the frequent assassination attempts on British and Indian police officers at this time, no attempt seems to have been made on the lives of any army officer attached to the Bengal Police, probably because of fear of reprisals by British or Indian Army troops.

  151. 151.

    B. C. Prance, DM, Dacca to H. Graham, Commissioner, Dacca Division, 23 April 1934, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 277 of 1934, WBSA.

  152. 152.

    Under the Bengal Emergency Powers Ordinance of 1932, a terrorist was defined as not merely a member of a terrorist organization, but anyone who “has done or is doing any act to assist the operations of any such association,” which included any indirect contact with a terrorist suspect. Calcutta Gazette, 10 June 1932, P&J No. 5172 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  153. 153.

    Hands wrote, “This incident illustrates well the ease with which absconders and active terrorists can move and obtain shelter in the Hindu villages in the Boalkhali and Patiya thanas” near Chittagong town. A. S. Hands, “Report on the operations against Absconders and Terrorists in the Chittagong District from the 9th March 1932 to 31st March 1933,” Parts I–III, 13 April 1933, P&J No. 5172 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  154. 154.

    Hunt, Life is Meeting, 21–22.

  155. 155.

    A. J. Dash, “Report on the operations against Absconders and Terrorists in the Chittagong District from the 9th March 1932 to 31st March 1933,” Part IV, 13 April 1933, P&J No. 5172 of 1931, L/P&J/7/242, APAC BL.

  156. 156.

    Anderson wrote to Sir Samuel Hoare that “I have my work cut out to smooth the badly ruffled feathers of my police.” Anderson to Hoare, 22 July 1933 and 28 August 1933, Templewood Collection, MSS Eur. E 240, APAC BL.

  157. 157.

    Sir Henry Twynam, “Golden Years and Times of Stress,” 132, Twynam Papers, CSAS.

  158. 158.

    Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists, 16.

  159. 159.

    Charles Tegart, “Terrorism in Bengal,” (1932) in TIB III: xxxvi–xxxvii.

  160. 160.

    David Petrie, quoted in Tegart memoir, 46.

  161. 161.

    Tegart memoir, 57.

  162. 162.

    John W. Wheeler-Bennett, John Anderson, Viscount Waverley (London: Macmillan, 1962), 143–145 and 161–162. For details of the assassination attempt on Anderson, see “List of Outrages, 1934. Part A,” in TIB VI: 1173–1177.

  163. 163.

    The ex-detenu’s supervisor, R. O. Raha, wrote of the goal of “Establishing confidence permanently in a healthy quarter to which one may turn for advice and help in the long future.” Report by R. O. Raha on YMCA training scheme for ex-detenus [nd], enclosure to letter from W. R. Gourlay, Private Sec. to GOB, to Hignell, GOI, 28 August 1920, Chelmsford Papers, MSS Eur. E 264/6, APAC BL. Unless otherwise stated, all information about the training scheme for ex-detenus in this and the following two paragraphs is taken from this report.

  164. 164.

    “Note on the Policy and Activities of the Terrorist Parties in Bengal from 1937 to August 1939,” (1940) in TIB I: 766.

  165. 165.

    Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists, 199–200.

  166. 166.

    “Note on the Policy and Activities of the Terrorist Parties in Bengal from 1937 to August 1939,” (1940) in TIB I: 766; and Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists, 178–179. More than 400 Bengali men had passed through the training scheme by the end of 1937. Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists, 200.

  167. 167.

    “Political and Administrative,” pp. 6–7, Pinnell Papers, MSS Eur. D 911, APAC BL. Anderson’s biographer repeated Pinnell’s words verbatim in the text of his book. Wheeler-Bennett, John Anderson, 138.

  168. 168.

    Patrick F. McDevitt, May the Best Man Win: Sport, Masculinity and Nationalism in Great Britain and the Empire, 1880–1935 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 7.

  169. 169.

    Partha Chatterjee, The Black Hole of Empire: History of a Global Practice of Power (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012), 292. Widespread public celebrations greeted the victory of the Bengali team Mohun Bagan over the East Yorkshire Regiment in the final of the 1911 Indian Football Association Shield. See Chatterjee, Black Hole, 295–298; and Tony Mason, “Football on the Maidan: Cultural Imperialism in Calcutta,” in J. A. Mangan, ed., The Cultural Bond: Sport, Empire, Society (London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 1992), 142–153.

  170. 170.

    Brian Griffin, “Sporting Policemen: Sports and Police in Victorian and Edwardian Ireland,” Éire-Ireland 48: 1&2 (2013), 54–78. For the sporting ethos of colonial police forces more generally, see Charles Jeffries, The Colonial Police (London: Max Parrish, 1952), 37.

  171. 171.

    P. E. S. Finney, “Notes for the Additional Superintendent Headquarters. Mymensingh. March, 1936,” p. 8, Finney Papers, CSAS.

  172. 172.

    Finney recalled that “I was particularly anxious that although I might take action against people who were acting against the law throughout my sub-division over the non-cooperation movement it didn’t stop me being friendly with them on the football field.” He also noted with pride that a police team won the first shield competition. Finney memoirs, Chap. 8, p. 33, MSS Eur. D 1014/4, APAC BL.

  173. 173.

    Hunt, Life is Meeting, 25.

  174. 174.

    According to Hunt, ICS officer Percival Griffiths organized a similar scheme in Mymensingh District. Hunt, Life is Meeting, 25; and L. G. Pinnell, “John Anderson in Bengal: Political and Administrative” (1959), Anderson Collection, MSS Eur. F 207, APAC BL.

  175. 175.

    S. K. Ghosh to F. W. Robertson, Commissioner, Rajshahi Division, 1 November 1935 and 18 November 1935, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 919 of 1935, WBSA.

  176. 176.

    Circular letter of Major M. Young, HQ, Presidency and Assam District, 18 September 1935; and S. K. Ghosh to F. W. Robertson, 18 November 1935, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 919 of 1935, WBSA.

  177. 177.

    Undated note by Charles Tegart [March-April 1937], in P. N. Chopra, ed., Towards Freedom 1937–47. Volume I: Experiment with Provincial Autonomy 1 January-31 December 1937 (New Delhi: Indian Council of Historical Research, 1985), 1326. For a contemporary appreciation, see Ladislav Jandásek, “The Sokol Movement in Czechoslovakia,” Slavonic and Eastern European Review 11: 31 (1932), 65–80.

  178. 178.

    Hardinge added, “You may remember that only a few years ago there was a sort of semi-military movement amongst the Bengali boys designed purposely to facilitate agitation and its possible developments.” Hardinge to Crewe, 6 June 1912, Hardinge Papers, 118/2/25, Cambridge University Library.

  179. 179.

    According to Allen Warren, “The emergence of the All-India Council was the occasion for an almost complete turn about in the attitude of the government of India towards native Scouting. Previously regarding it as potentially subversive, it now saw the Scouting philosophy as a potential ally in the continuing battle between imperial control and the rising tide of nationalism.” Allen Warren, “Citizens of the Empire: Baden-Powell, Scouts and Guides and an Imperial Ideal, 1900–1940,” in John M. Mackenzie, ed., Imperialism and Popular Culture (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986), 249. See also Carey A. Watt, “The Promise of ‘Character’ and the Spectre of Sedition: The Boy Scout Movement and Colonial Consternation in India, 1908–1921,” South Asia 12: 2 (1999), 37–62.

  180. 180.

    Carey Watt, “’No Showy Muscles’: The Boy Scouts and the Global Dimensions of Physical Culture and Bodily Health in Britain and Colonial India,” in Nelson R. Block and Tammy M. Proctor, eds., Scouting Frontiers: Youth and the Scout Movement’s First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009), 135.

  181. 181.

    H. D. Craik, GOB, to Lord Baden-Powell, 30 March 1937, and Baden-Powell to Lord Brabourne, Governor of Bengal, 18 April 1937, in Chopra, ed., Towards Freedom 1937–47, 295–296 and 402–403.

  182. 182.

    Coralie Taylor to her parents, 18 December 1934, S. G. Taylor Papers, CSAS. In the same year, the Commissioner of Burdwan Division wrote to the Government of Bengal that he encouraged “the Boy Scout, Folk-dancing and Bratachari movements as affording healthy diversions during leisure hours.” L. B. Burrows, Commissioner, Burdwan Division, to CS to GOB, 30 May 1934, L/P&J/12/399, APAC BL.

  183. 183.

    Fortnightly Report on the Political Situation in Bengal, First Half of May 1938, R/3/2/7, APAC BL.

  184. 184.

    John Rosselli, “The Self-Image of Effeteness: Physical Education and Nationalism in Nineteenth-century Bengal,” Past and Present No. 86 (1980), 141.

  185. 185.

    Sayantani Adhikary, “The Bratachari Movement and the Invention of a ‘Folk Tradition,’” South Asia 38: 4 (2015), 656–670; and Frank J. Korom, “Gurusaday Dutt, Vernacular Nationalism and the Folk Culture Revival in Colonial Bengal,” in Firoz Mahmud and Sharani Zaman, eds., Folklore in Context: Essays in Honor of Shamsuzzaman Khan (Dhaka: The University Press, 2010), 257–273.

  186. 186.

    G. S. Dutt, The Bratachari Synthesis (1937; Reprint Calcutta: Bengal Bratachari Society, 1981), 21.

  187. 187.

    Ramananda Chatterji, The Bratachari Movement (Calcutta: Bengal Bratachari Society, 1940), 23.

  188. 188.

    Rosselli, “Self-Image of Effeteness,” 141.

  189. 189.

    Dutt, Bratachari Synthesis, 23 and 58.

  190. 190.

    Dutt, Bratachari Synthesis, 6 and 10.

  191. 191.

    Anderson to Lord Zetland, Sec. of State for India, 31 October 1935, Anderson Collection, MSS Eur. F. 207/6, APAC BL; and Note by S. Basu, 25 June 1935, GOB Home (Pol) Conf. No. 664 of 1935, WBSA.

  192. 192.

    Cited in Dutt, Bratachari Synthesis, 7.

  193. 193.

    Dutt, Bratachari Synthesis, 15.

  194. 194.

    Wheeler-Bennett, John Anderson, 135.

  195. 195.

    Ghosh, Gentlemanly Terrorists, 160–169.

  196. 196.

    Government of Bengal officials, however, argued that in spite of concerns about the security of police intelligence under an Indian ministry, “without the effective cooperation of the ordinary Police,” the IB would be “pretty helpless,” and would have a “false perspective” on political issues. John Anderson to Sir Samuel Hoare, Sec. of State, 28 August 1933 and 2 January 1934, Templewood Collection, MSS Eur. E 240/9, APAC BL. Additional Sec. S. N. Roy of the GOB further emphasized the role of the ordinary police in monitoring detenus and conducting searches. Note by S. N. Roy, 31 January 1934, enclosure to Anderson to Hoare, 14 February 1934, in Ibid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Silvestri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Silvestri, M. (2019). Intelligence Failures, Militarization, and Rehabilitation: The Anti-Terrorist Campaign After the Chittagong Armoury Raid. In: Policing ‘Bengali Terrorism’ in India and the World. Britain and the World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18042-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18042-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18041-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18042-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics