Skip to main content

Authoritarian Populism and Brexit in the UK in Historical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy

Abstract

Populist politics has historically been weak in the UK compared with other democracies. Social conservatism and moral authoritarianism have waxed and waned in popularity but rarely turned into a significant political force. Resentment at immigration is the long-standing exception, the only issue in modern times with the consistent capacity to disrupt the electoral basis of the party system. The impact of populist movements and politicians exploiting the immigration issue depends more on the existence of intermediary institutions that blunt the exposure of political elites to the ‘people’, and vice versa, than on the strength of public opinion; these intermediary institutions have been eroded in recent years. Populism in the UK would shrivel if the immigration issue was resolved; liberals have a responsibility to re-design a progressive policy that addresses the causes of popular hostility at major surges of immigration in order to defend the principles and achievements of liberal democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Uxbridge (8% of the vote) in December 1972 and West Bromwich (16%) in May 1973.

  2. 2.

    Nuclear weapons, the poll tax and the invasion of Iraq might be cited as other examples. But CND—the movement for unilateral nuclear disarmament—was engaged in converting the Labour party, and the poll tax riots were a popular revolt against a particular government policy. Only opposition to the invasion of Iraq included a sense of betrayal by the political class, for misleading the public about Iraq’s capacity to deploy weapons of mass destruction.

  3. 3.

    Europe, because Canada and Australia are exceptions.

References

  • Ball, P. 2017. They Came from Outer Space—And Europe. Prospect, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benewick, R. 1972. The Fascist Movement in Britain. London: Allen Lane the Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesarini, D. 1994. The Jewish Chronicle and Anglo-Jewry, 1841–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J., S. Fisher, R. Ford, and P. English. 2018. Appendix 1: The Results Analysed’ in Philip Cowley and Dennis Kavanagh. In The British General Election of 2017, 449–495. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, P. 2018. Thermostatic Public Opinion: Why UK Anti-immigrant Sentiments Rise and then Fall. LSE British Politics and Policy blog, 29 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., and J. Tilley. 2017. The New Politics of Class, 182–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, J. A. 1971. The English and Immigration: A Comparative Study of the Jewish Influx 1880–1910. London: Institute of Race Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, J., and A. Menon. 2018. Brexit. In The British General Election of 2017, ed. Philip Cowley and Dennis Kavanagh, 21–40. (especially pp. 30–31). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., and C. Milazzo. 2015. UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A., R. Jowell, J. Curtice, G. Evans, J. Field, and S. Witherspoon. 1991. Understanding Political Change: The British Voter, 1964–1987. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffer, S. 1999. Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell. London: Orion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M. 1959. Democracy and Working Class Authoritarianism. American Sociological Review 24 (4): 482–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margaret Thatcher Foundation. 1978. https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/103485.

  • National Centre for Social Research. 1983. British Social Attitudes. London: NatCen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Voting: The 2017 Election: New Divides in British Politics? In British Social Attitudes. London: NatCen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, T. 2016. All Out War: The Full Story of How Brexit Sank Britain’s Political Class. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, R. 2006. Fascism in Britain: From Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts to the National Front. New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, P., M. Goodwin, and H. Clarke. 2018. The Rise and Fall of UKIP, 2010–17. In None Past the Post: Britain at the Polls, 2017, ed. Nicholas Allen and John Bartle. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivor Crewe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crewe, I. (2020). Authoritarian Populism and Brexit in the UK in Historical Perspective. In: Crewe, I., Sanders, D. (eds) Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17997-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics