Skip to main content

Ideas, Institutions and the Politicians of Our Governments: Anthony King as a Student of Liberal Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy

Abstract

This chapter reflects on Anthony King’s work as a student of liberal democracy, in particular his work on the changing character and quality of British and American democracy. King wrote a great deal about these two cases and the democratic ideas, institutions and practices associated with each. The chapter identifies and engages with three general themes that characterised King’s writings: his general interest in democratic diversity, his scepticism towards too much democracy, especially in the form of ‘hyper responsiveness’, and his concern with the quality of government and democratic outputs. The author argues that King was ultimately a realist when it came to democracy: it was what it was and it could be successful in different ways. Largely for that reason, democratic government was something that deserved to be described, explained, evaluated and above all understood on its own terms and in its different incarnations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of the former, the comparators were Sweden and Japan (King 1993). In the case of the latter, they were Britain and Germany (King 1997).

References

  • Birch, Anthony H. 1984. Overload, Ungovernability and Delegitimation: The Theories and the British Case. British Journal of Political Science 14 (2): 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michel J., Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1975. A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, Matthew. 2012. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Robert, and Matthew J. Goodwin. 2014. Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 1975. Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s. In Studies in Politics: Essays to Mark the 25th Anniversary of the Political Studies Association, ed. F.F. Ridley, 162–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Implications of One-Party Government. In Britain at the Polls 1992, ed. Anthony Kind, 223–248. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Running Scared: Why America’s Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern Too Little. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The British Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. As the Queen Opens Parliament, the Chasm Between Politics and People Widens. Daily Telegraph, 3 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Founding Fathers v. the People: Paradoxes of American Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Who Governs Britain? London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Eight Centuries On: Who Are Britain’s Barons now? In Magna Carta and Its Modern Legacy, ed. Robert Hazell and James Melton, 42–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony, and Ivor Crewe. 2013. The Blunders of Our Governments. London: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Michael. 2018. Whatever Happened to Overloaded Government? The Political Quarterly 89 (1): 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Power Report. 2006. Power to the People: An Independent Inquiry into Britain’s Democracy. Layerthorpe, York: Power Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, Albert. 2007. Democracy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Allen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Allen, N. (2020). Ideas, Institutions and the Politicians of Our Governments: Anthony King as a Student of Liberal Democracy. In: Crewe, I., Sanders, D. (eds) Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17997-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics