The Stochastic Intelligence. A Technical Model from Ancient Greece to Robotics

  • Salvatore Di PiazzaEmail author
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 130)


What do we mean when we talk about the “intelligence” of robots? In what sense does a robot “reason” and “take decisions”? Answering these questions can give food for thought towards understanding whether there is either something so specific in human beings that cannot be reproduced in robots, or—as an alternative—the way to improve robots in emulating human behavior. In the following pages I will try to give my contribution by shedding light on some characteristics concerning human reasoning and rationality, mainly referring to the ancient Greek philosophical tradition.


Techne stochastike Intelligence Taking decisions Rationality 


  1. 1.
    Allen, J.: Failure and expertise in the ancient conception of an art. In: Horowitz, T., Janis, A.I. (eds.) Scientific Failure, pp. 81–108. Rowman & Littlefield, Londra (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aubenque, P.: La prudence chez Aristote. PUF, Paris (1963)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnes, J.: Medicine, experience and logic. In: Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M.F., Schofield, M. (eds.) Science and Speculation, pp. 24–68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burnyeat, M.: Gods and heaps. In: Schofield, M., Nussbaum, M.C. (eds.) Language and Logos, pp. 315–338. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danblon, E.: Rhétorique et rationalité. Essai sur l’émergence de la critique et de la persuasion. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danblon, E.: L’Homme rhétorique. Culture, raison, action. CERF, Paris (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Detienne, M., Vernant, J.P.: Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1991) (Les ruses de l’intelligence: la mètis des Grecs (1974), Flammarion, Paris)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Piazza, S.: Congetture e approssimazioni. Forme del sapere in Aristotele. Mimesis, Milano (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Piazza, S., Piazza, F.: The words of conjecture. Semiotics and epistemology in ancient medicine and rhetoric. Rhetorica J. Hist. Rhetoric 34(1), 1–26 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isnardi Parente, M.: “TECHNE”, La parola del passato. Rivista di studi antichi, XVI, pp.257–296 (1961)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isnardi Parente, M.: Techne. Momenti del pensiero Greco da Platone a Epicuro. Firenze, La Nuova Italia (1966)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinneavy, J.L., Eskin, C.R.: Kairos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Written Commun. 17(3), 432–444 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laumond, J.P.: Simplexité et Robotique: vers un génie de l’action encorporée. In: Berthoz, A., Petit, J.L. (eds.) Complexité-Simplexité. Collède de France, Paris (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laumond, J.P.: Robotics: Hephaestus does it again. In: Herath, D., Kroos, C., Stelarc (eds.) Robots and Art: Exploring an Unlikely Symbiosis, pp. 67–86, Singapore, Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montgomery Hunter, K.: Narrative, literature, and the clinical exercise of practical reason. J. Med. Phil. 21, 303–320 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moutsopoulos, E.: La function du kairos selon Aristote. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 175, 223–226 (1985)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Natali, C.: La saggezza di Aristotele. Bibliopolis, Napoli (1989)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pender, S.: Between medicine and rhetoric. Early Sci. Med. 10(1), 36–64 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piazza, F.: Taking aim and hitting the target. Some remarks on the Aristotelian notion of eustochia. In: Nicolas, L. (ed.) Le fragile et le flou. De la précarité en rhétorique, pp. 47–59. Classiques Garnier, Paris (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trédé, M.: Kairòs. L’à-propos et l’occasion (le mot et la notion, d’Homère à la fin du IVe siècle avant J.-C.). Éditions Klincksieck, Paris (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations