Assumptions and Precautions

  • Oldrich BubakEmail author
  • Henry Jacek


Many popular science authors have been tempted by certitude—a confident conclusion glossing over assumptions, evidentiary limits, and balance—helping their argument and satisfying their readers’ discomfort with uncertainty. Indeed, this form of trivialization is ubiquitous in public discourse, yet remains underappreciated despite its ramifications in policymaking and regulation and its impact on the public’s trust of government. The chapter begins with a discussion and illustrations of common practices leading to such certitude. It continues with a case study of certitudes, which, upon a closer look, are far from credible, yet of deep consequence to all. Historical experiences and advancing worldviews are propelling the rise of an important counterweight to scientific certitude with the potential to effect change beyond policymaking.


  1. Aburto, Nancy J., Anna Ziolkovska, Lee Hooper, Paul Elliott, Francesco P. Cappuccio, and Joerg J. Meerpohl. 2013. “Effect of lower sodium intake on health: Systematic review and meta-analyses.” British Medical Journal 346: f1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, John S. 2002. “The taming of the precautionary principle.” William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 27: 13.Google Scholar
  3. Atran, Scott. 2015. “IQ.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  4. Bayer, Ronald, David Merritt Johns, and Sandro Galea. 2012. “Salt and public health: Contested science and the challenge of evidence-based decision making.” Health Affairs 31 (12): 2738–2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehner, John, ed. 2011. Obamacare: A budget-busting, job-killing health care law. DIANE Publishing. As cited in Rawal (2016).
  6. CBO. 2010. “Letter to the honorable Nancy Pelosi on H.R. 4872, the Reconciliation Act of 2010. Congressional Budget Office. March 20.”
  7. CBO. 2015. “Insurance coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act—CBO’s March 2015 Baseline.” Congressional Budget Office.
  8. European Environment Agency. 2013. Late lessons from early warnings II: Science, precaution, innovation. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, Elizabeth Charlotte, Judith S. Jones, and René von Schomberg, eds. 2006. Implementing the precautionary principle: Perspectives and prospects. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goklany, Indur M. 2001. The precautionary principle: A critical appraisal of environmental risk assessment. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Goldberger, Arthur S., and Charles F. Manski. 1995. “The Bell Curve by Herrnstein and Murray.” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (2): 762.Google Scholar
  13. Graudal, Niels, and Gesche Jürgens. 2011. “The sodium phantom.” British Medical Journal 343: d6119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graudal, Niels, and Gesche Jürgens. 2013. “The (political) science of salt revisited.” British Medical Journal 346: f2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannay, Timo. 2015. “Nature versus nurture.” In This idea must die: Scientific theories that are blocking progress, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  16. Harremoës, Poul, David Gee, Malcolm MacGarvin, Andy Stirling, Jane Keys, Brian Wynne, and Sofia Guedes Vaz, eds. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896–2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  17. He, Feng J., and Graham A. MacGregor. 2004. “Effect of longer-term modest salt reduction on blood pressure.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3 (3): CD004937. As cited in Gradual and Gesche (2013).Google Scholar
  18. He, Feng J., Jiafu Li, and Graham A. MacGregor. 2013. “Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.” British Medical Journal 346: f1325. As cited in Gradual and Gesche (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horgan, John. 2014. “Chewing the fat with diet ‘Journalist’ Gary Taubes.” Scientific American, October 7.
  20. Mandel, Gregory N., and James Thuo Gathii. 2006. “Cost-benefit analysis versus the precautionary principle: Beyond Cass Sunstein’s laws of fear.” University of Illinois Law Review 1037–1080.Google Scholar
  21. Manski, Charles F. 2007. Identification for prediction and decision. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. As cited in Manski (2011, 2013).Google Scholar
  22. Manski, Charles F. 2011. “Policy analysis with incredible certitude.” The Economic Journal 121 (554): F261–F289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manski, Charles F. 2013. Public policy in an uncertain world: Analysis and decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Marchant, Gary Elvin, and Kenneth L. Mossman. 2004. Arbitrary and capricious: The precautionary principle in the European Union courts. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Martuzzi, Marco, and Joel A. Tickner, eds. 2004. The precautionary principle: Protecting public health, the environment and the future of our children. Copenhagen: The World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  26. Murray, Charles, and Richard Herrnstein. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press. As cited in Goldberger and Manski (1995).Google Scholar
  27. Pinker, Steven. 2003. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Raffensperger, Carolyn, and Joel A. Tickner. 1999. Protecting public health and the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rawal, Purva H. 2016. The affordable care act: Examining the facts. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, Marilynne. 2010. Absence of mind: The dispelling of inwardness from the modern myth of the self. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Steel, Daniel. 2015. Philosophy and the precautionary principle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Taubes, Gary. 1998. The (political) science of salt. Science (New York, NY), 281(5379).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taubes, Gary. 2012. “Salt, we misjudged you.” The New York Times, June 2.
  35. Taubes, Gary. 2014. “Why nutrition is so confusing.” The New York Times, February 8.
  36. Taubes, Gary, and Nina Teicholz. 2018. “U.S. News is wrong about what constitutes the best diet.” The LA Times, January 28.
  37. Voorhes, Adam. 2014. “Why are we so fat? The Multimillion-dollar scientific quest to find out.” Wired, August 19.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations