What We Can Learn
- 80 Downloads
There have been recurring doubts about the capacity of most people—assumed to be limited by their knowledge, interest, or cognitive capacity—to make good decisions. What We Can Learn begins with a look at select research in the formation of public opinion, revealing the variety of factors behind how people come to their views. It next explores a number of cognitive and behavioral limits affecting the way we perceive and approach issues, and in turn how most make choices. It is argued that decisive in the age of complexity becomes how we think, as this determines how we view and approach problems, seek and evaluate information, and speak to each other. And research indicates it is possible to overcome the limits and do better.
- BBC. 2009. “Rabbits devastate island wildlife.” BBC News, January 12. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7824153.stm.
- Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press. As cited in Hibbing and Theiss-Morse (2004) and Delli Carpini (2000).Google Scholar
- DeSteno, David. 2018. “Intertemporal choice.” In This idea is brilliant: Lost, overlooked, and underappreciated scientific concepts everyone should know, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial. Google Scholar
- Dörner, Dietrich. 1997. The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
- Gallup. 2017. “Americans more positive about effects of immigration.” Gallup, Inc. June 28. https://news.gallup.com/poll/213146/americans-positive-effects-immigration.aspx.
- Gottfried, Jeffrey and Elisa Shearer. 2016. “News use across social media platforms 2016.” Pew Research Center, May 26. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/.
- Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1998. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2004. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Hunter, James Davison, and Carl Desportes Bowman. 2016. “The vanishing center of American democracy.” The Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture. http://iasculture.org/research/publications/vanishing-center.
- Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Google Scholar
- Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1982. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, edited by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Mandel, Gregory N., and James Thuo Gathii. 2006. “Cost-benefit analysis versus the precautionary principle: Beyond Cass Sunstein’s laws of fear.” University of Illinois Law Review 1037–1080.Google Scholar
- NORC (National Opinion Research Center). 2009. General social surveys 1972–2008: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: Conducted for the National Data Program for the Social Sciences at National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. As cited in Strauss (2012).Google Scholar
- Strauss, Claudia. 2012. Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social programs. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Zaller, John R. 2005 (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar