Advertisement

What We Can Learn

  • Oldrich BubakEmail author
  • Henry Jacek
Chapter
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

There have been recurring doubts about the capacity of most people—assumed to be limited by their knowledge, interest, or cognitive capacity—to make good decisions. What We Can Learn begins with a look at select research in the formation of public opinion, revealing the variety of factors behind how people come to their views. It next explores a number of cognitive and behavioral limits affecting the way we perceive and approach issues, and in turn how most make choices. It is argued that decisive in the age of complexity becomes how we think, as this determines how we view and approach problems, seek and evaluate information, and speak to each other. And research indicates it is possible to overcome the limits and do better.

References

  1. BBC. 2009. “Rabbits devastate island wildlife.” BBC News, January 12. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7824153.stm.
  2. Delli Carpini, Michael X. 2000. “In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters.” The Communication Review 4 (1): 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press. As cited in Hibbing and Theiss-Morse (2004) and Delli Carpini (2000).Google Scholar
  4. DeSteno, David. 2018. “Intertemporal choice.” In This idea is brilliant: Lost, overlooked, and underappreciated scientific concepts everyone should know, edited by John Brockman. New York: Harper Perennial. Google Scholar
  5. Dörner, Dietrich. 1997. The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
  6. Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. “The democratic disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frederick, Shane, George Loewenstein, and Ted O’Donoghue. 2002. “Time discounting and time preference: A critical review.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallup. 2017. “Americans more positive about effects of immigration.” Gallup, Inc. June 28. https://news.gallup.com/poll/213146/americans-positive-effects-immigration.aspx.
  9. Gottfried, Jeffrey and Elisa Shearer. 2016. “News use across social media platforms 2016.” Pew Research Center, May 26. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/.
  10. Griffin, Dale, and Amos Tversky. 1992. “The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence.” Cognitive Psychology 24 (3): 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1998. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2004. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, James Davison, and Carl Desportes Bowman. 2016. “The vanishing center of American democracy.” The Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture. http://iasculture.org/research/publications/vanishing-center.
  14. Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott Matthews. 2012. “Why do citizens discount the future? Public opinion and the timing of policy consequences.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1982. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, edited by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  17. Levitt, Barbara, and James G. March. 1998. “Organizational learning.” Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1): 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandel, Gregory N., and James Thuo Gathii. 2006. “Cost-benefit analysis versus the precautionary principle: Beyond Cass Sunstein’s laws of fear.” University of Illinois Law Review 1037–1080.Google Scholar
  19. NORC (National Opinion Research Center). 2009. General social surveys 1972–2008: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: Conducted for the National Data Program for the Social Sciences at National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. As cited in Strauss (2012).Google Scholar
  20. Shaker, Lee. 2009. “Citizens’ local political knowledge and the role of media access.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86 (4): 809–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strauss, Claudia. 2012. Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social programs. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  22. Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Zaller, John R. 2005 (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations