Advertisement

Democracy (Re)Imagined

  • Oldrich BubakEmail author
  • Henry Jacek
Chapter

Abstract

Democracy (Re)Imagined begins with a brief review of opinion surveys, which, over the recent decades, indicate steady increases in the levels of mistrust of the media, skepticism of the government’s effectiveness, and the public’s antipathy toward politics. It thus continues to explore the realities and the logic behind these perspectives. What can be done to institute good governance and renew the faith in the democratic system? It is becoming evident that rather than relying on the idea of more democracy, governance for the new age is smart, bringing in people where they are most capable and engaged. Here, the focus is primarily on the United States providing an extreme case in the evolution of democratic systems and a rationale for revisiting the tenets of governance.

References

  1. Berggruen, Nicolas, and Nathan Gardels. 2013. Intelligent governance for the 21st century: A middle way between west and east. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  2. Blyth, Mark. 2012. Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brill, Steven. 2018. Tailspin: The people and forces behind America’s fifty-year fall—And those fighting to reverse it. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press. As cited in Powell (2004). Google Scholar
  5. Dahl, Robert. 2006. A preface to democratic theory. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, Russell J. 2017. “Political trust in North America.” In Handbook on political trust, edited by Sonja Zmerli and Tom W. G. van der Meer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar
  7. Diamond, Larry. 2004. “The state of democratization at the beginning of the 21st century.” The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 6 (1): 13–18. Google Scholar
  8. The Economist. 2011. “The perils of extreme democracy.” The Economist, April 20. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2011/04/20/the-perils-of-extreme-democracy.
  9. The Economist. 2012. “The gap widens, again: No more than a temporary blip from the great recession.” The Economist, March 10. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2012/03/10/the-gap-widens-again.
  10. Faguet, Guy B. 2013. The Affordable Care Act: A missed opportunity, A better way forward. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. “The democratic disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ford, Martin. 2015. Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  13. Gerring, John, Strom C. Thacker, and Carola Moreno. 2008. “Are Parliamentary Systems Better?” Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 327–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacker, Jacob, and Paul Pierson. 2010. “Winner-take-all politics: Public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States.” Politics & Society 38 (2): 152–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hacker, Jacob, and Paul Pierson. 2011. Winner-take-all politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Hardin, Russell. 2000. “The public trust.” In Disaffected democracies, edited by Susan J. Pharr and Robert. D. Putnam. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, Christopher. 2012. Twilight of the elites: America after meritocracy. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2004. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  20. Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is gender like ethnicity? The political representation of identity groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–458.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, James Davison, and Carl Desportes Bowman. 2016. “The vanishing center of American Democracy.” The Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture. http://iasculture.org/research/publications/vanishing-center.
  22. Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. “Postmodernization erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy.” In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lardeyret, Guy. 1991. “The problem with PR.” Journal of Democracy 2 (3): 30–35.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2002. “Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lijphart, Arend. 1991. “Constitutional choices for new democracies.” Journal of Democracy 2 (1): 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional design for divided societies.” Journal of Democracy 15 (2): 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. McCombs, Maxwell, and Amy Reynolds, eds. 1999. The poll with a human face: The national issues convention experiment in political communication. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  29. Mills, C. Wright. 2000. The power elite. Vol. 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Choosing electoral systems: Proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems.” International Political Science Review 18 (3): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, Mancur. 2002. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  33. Olson, Mancur. 2008. The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  34. Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2004. “Political representation in comparative politics.’ Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quade, Quentin L. 1991. “PR and democratic statecraft.” Journal of Democracy 2 (3): 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order.” International Organization 2: 36.Google Scholar
  37. Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The menu of manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, Martin J. 1990. “Pluralism, reformed pluralism and neopluralism: The role of pressure groups in policy-making.” Political Studies 38 (2): 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Truman, David B. 1971. The governmental process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. As cited in Gilens and Page (2014).Google Scholar
  40. Warren, Mark E., and Hilary Pearse, eds. 2008. Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wessel, David. 2015. “The typical male U.S. worker earned less in 2014 than in 1973.” The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-typical-male-u-s-worker-earned-less-in-2014-than-in-1973/.
  42. Zakaria, Fareed. 2007. The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Zakaria, Fareed. 2012. “America needs a 2-page tax code.” The Global Public Square Blog. http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/24/zakaria-america-needs-a-2-page-tax-code/.
  44. Zakaria, Fareed. 2016. “How Trump exposed the corruption in the U.S. tax code.” The Washington Post, October 6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-trump-exposed-the-corruption-in-the-us-tax-code/2016/10/06/612eec4e-8bf8-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations