Thinking Change

  • Oldrich BubakEmail author
  • Henry Jacek


Thinking Change retraces the path of the book’s voyage exploring trivialization, discourses and opinions, realities and histories, and the limits and potentials of our thinking individually and collectively. How can we get ahead? The answer partly lies in our surrendering of the traditional philosophies of education in favor of new approaches. Some of the assumptions informing our goals in education date back to times when education was an option for the few, not a necessity of the many, meeting their limits in modern age. We highlight that there, beyond the conventional ideas, lie realistic solutions deserving our attention. They hold a promise to improve our education by advancing effectively our predominant style of thought, our discourse and culture more broadly, changing with it our prospects.


  1. Barnes, Michael Horace. 2000. Stages of thought: The co-evolution of religious thought and science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauerlein, Mark. 2008. The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Berggruen, Nicolas, and Nathan Gardels. 2013. Intelligent governance for the 21st century: A middle way between west and east. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bohm, David. 2013. On dialogue. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, Jason. 2017. Against democracy: New preface. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cummings, Dominic. 2013. “Some thoughts on education and political priorities.” The Guardian, October 11.
  7. Dalton, Russell J. 2017. “Political trust in North America.” In Handbook on political trust, edited by Sonja Zmerli and Tom W. G. Van der Meer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Delli Carpini, Michael X. 2000. “In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters.” The Communication Review 4 (1): 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dörner, Dietrich. 1997. The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
  10. Egan, Kieran. 1997. The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. “The democratic disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fullan, Michael. 2010. All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1998. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  14. Helbing, Dirk. 2015. Thinking ahead—Essays on big data, digital revolution, and participatory market society. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2004. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  16. Keynes, John Maynard. 2018 (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Kinney, Eleanor D. 2015. The affordable care act and medicare in comparative context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Manski, Charles F. 2011. “Policy analysis with incredible certitude.” The Economic Journal 121 (554): F261–F289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manski, Charles F. 2013. Public policy in an uncertain world: Analysis and decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, Sandra D. 2012. Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Olson, Steve, ed. 2018. The science of science communication III: Inspiring novel collaborations and building capacity: Proceedings of a colloquium, 63. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  22. Payne, Sebastian. 2016. “How vote leave won the EU referendum.” Financial Times, June 24.
  23. Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Strauss, Claudia. 2012. Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social programs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Warren, Mark E., and Hilary Pearse, eds. 2008. Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Zaller, John R. 2005 (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations