• Oldrich BubakEmail author
  • Henry Jacek


Social and political change has historically come on the heels of major milestones marking the broadening of popular access to information. The age of information has exposed the limits to these trends, however. An uncommon starting point in the study of the contemporary condition is daily discourse, revealing, as is observed, a fundamental lapse inhibiting our collective ability to understand, discuss, and address the increasingly complex challenges of the present day. This is identified as trivialization, a style of discourse dominated by confident, easy to manage claims, intuitions, and other more or less familiar shortcuts, rather than by evidence, reason, and humility—leaving little room for nuance and hence debate. How do we understand better this lapse so that we can seek improvement?


  1. Applebaum, Yoni. 2014. “Publishers gave away 122,951,031 books during World War II.” The Atlantic, September 10.
  2. Arthur, Brian W. 2014. Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Michael Horace. 2000. Stages of thought: The co-evolution of religious thought and science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, Bruce. 2007. “How supply-side economics trickled down.” The New York Times, April 6.
  5. Bauerlein, Mark. 2008. The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. BBC Business. 2016. “Pound plunges after Leave vote.” BBC Business, June 24.
  7. Bennett, Lance W., and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. “The logic of connective action.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berggruen, Nicolas, and Nathan Gardels. 2013. Intelligent governance for the 21st century: A middle way between west and east. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  9. Calamur, Krishnadev, Matt Ford, and Kathy Gilsinan. 2016. “Britain, post-Brexit.” The Atlantic, July 22.
  10. Cooper, Andrew. 2016. “The Brexit vote is history. A closed or open Britain is the defining battle now.” The Guardian, July 4.
  11. Curtice, John. 2016. “Brexit buyers’ remorse? There’s more evidence of abstainers’ regret.” LSE Analyses: British Politics and Policy.
  12. Dennison, James, and Noah Carl. 2016. “The ultimate causes of Brexit: History, culture, and geography.” LSE Analyses: British Politics and Policy.
  13. Dudley, Leonard. 2008. Information revolutions in the history of the West, 174. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EC (European Commission). 2012. “Special Eurobarometer 386: Europeans and their languages.” Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
  15. The Economist. 2011. “The perils of extreme democracy.” The Economist, April 20.
  16. Edgerton, Gary R. 2007. The Columbia history of American television. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, Mark U. 2005. Printing, propaganda, and Martin Luther. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. Google Scholar
  18. Egan, Kieran. 1997. The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, Michael. 2010. All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar
  20. Fung, Brian. 2016. “The British are frantically Googling what the E.U. is, hours after voting to leave it.” The Washington Post, June 24.
  21. Giles, Chris. 2016. “What are the economic consequences of Brexit?” Financial Times, February 22.
  22. Harris, Sam, and Noam Chomsky. 2015. “The limits of discourse.” Unpublished correspondence.
  23. Helbing, Dirk. 2015. “How and why our conventional economic thinking causes global crises.” Thinking ahead, essays on big data, digital revolution, and participatory market society, 39–52. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar
  24. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2004. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hofstadter, Richard. 1963. Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  26. Howard, Philip N., Aiden Duffy, Deen Freelon, Muzammil M. Hussain, Will Mari, and Marwa Maziad. 2011. “Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring?” SSRN:
  27. IMF. 2016. “IMF cuts global growth forecasts on Brexit, warns of risks to outlook.” The International Monetary Fund News, July 19.
  28. Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott Matthews. 2012. “Why do citizens discount the future? Public opinion and the timing of policy consequences.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacoby, Susan. 2008. The age of American unreason. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
  30. Jefferson, Thomas. 1817. “A letter to George Ticknor, November 25.” Thomas Jefferson Foundation.
  31. Kearns Goodwin, Doris. 2005. Team of rivals: The political genius of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
  32. Manski, Charles F. 2013. Public policy in an uncertain world: Analysis and decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Manski, Charles F. 2011. “Policy analysis with incredible certitude.” The Economic Journal 121 (554): F261–F289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKeever, David, and Mike Rapport. 2013. “Technology and the revolutions of 1848 and 2011.” Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
  35. McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  36. McLuhan, Marshall, and Quentin Fiore. 1968. War and peace in the global village. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  37. Mlodinow, Leonard. 2015. “It is, in fact, rocket science.” The New York Times, May 16.
  38. O’Hara, Kieron. 2011. Conservatism. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  39. Peary, Brett, Rajib Shaw, and Yukiko Takeuchi. 2012. “Utilization of social media in the east Japan earthquake and tsunami and its effectiveness.” Journal of Natural Disaster Science 34 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodrik, Dani. 2012. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy, 62–65. New York: W. W. Norton. Google Scholar
  41. Rodrik, Dani. 2015. “The war of trade models.”
  42. Searchmetrics. 2015. “The Guardian tops list of most popular UK newspaper sites on Twitter, finds new study,” January 20. London: Searchmetrics.
  43. Spence, Peter. 2016. “What is TTIP and how is it supposed to make us better off?”
  44. Sunstein, Cass. 2013. Simpler: The future of government. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  45. Thaler, Richard, and Cass Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  46. Urquhart, Conal. 2016. “The worst of the Brexit fallout is still to hit the U.K.” Time, July 1.
  47. Walker, Andrew. 2015. “TTIP: Why the EU-US trade deal matters.” BBC World Service Economics.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations