Abstract
This chapter is an attempt to make sense of the nature, modalities, outcomes and possibilities of urban energy transition in Paris. This transition process is examined in the context of a variety of equally meaningful stakes and strategic objectives around decarbonization, municipal control of infrastructure and the continuing role of nuclear power. Each of these concerns emerges through debates and knowledge controversies around the make-up, functioning and use of particular objects or materials including resources, pipes, contracts, reports and radiators. This captures a processual notion of transition as characterized by work and activities at different sites and levels, and as constituted by the effectivity of material circulations, flows and stabilities which reveal and highlight key issues and contentions, become open to claims and appropriations, and defy, resist and remain unruly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The title has also been translated more directly as ‘The electricity fairy’, but this does not capture as well, in my view, the sense of a widespread diffusion of a life-sustaining current or phenomena.
- 2.
As one interviewee put it for example: ‘We would like the term “energy transition” to disappear and to be replaced by “climate, air, energy”. At least that would be clear, because in my opinion in two years the energy transition will not be fashionable and everyone will have forgotten what it is’ (City of Paris official interview, May 2013).
- 3.
Local electricity supply is also a separate public service. The City of Paris has, however, attributed a single public service concession for both services (distribution and supply) to ERDF and EDF (as separate but closely linked companies). For the Regional Court of Accounts, this is ‘a source of confusion and opacity’ (Chambre Régionale des Comptes d’Ile-de-France 2010, p. 2).
- 4.
These administrative tribunals have the task of overseeing and verifying the accounts of public authorities and local governments.
- 5.
A 2009 audit identified a level of underinvestment in the Paris network to the tune of between 750 million and 1 billion euros, so it is an ageing infrastructure which has been 60% amortized (compared to a national average of 39%) (Baupin and Gassin 2009).
- 6.
It is only since the end of 2013 that ERDF has been obliged by State Council (Conseil d’Etat), the administrative supreme court, to provide detailed disaggregated technical and financial information about each of the contracts that it runs.
- 7.
Indeed, at this time electricity began to be produced in quantities which vastly surpassed demand: ‘we didn’t know at all who was going to consume it all’ (EDF engineer, quoted in Weiler 2016).
- 8.
In the study, individual electric heating consumed less than 100 KWh/m2/year compared to collective gas or district heating at around 250 KWh/m2/year. The former also produced far less CO2 at 89 kg/inhabitant compared to 665 kg/inhabitant for fuel heating (APUR 2007, summary on p. 48).
- 9.
A Greenpeace study showed that an electricity future based on renewables would provide more value for money than renewing nuclear plants (Greenpeace 2014).
References
ADEME. 2015. Vers un mix électrique 100% renouvelable en 2050: rapport final. Paris: ADEME.
APUR. 2007. Consommations d’énergie et émissions de gaz à effet de serre liées au chauffage des résidences principales parisiennes. Paris: APUR.
APUR. 2013. Une plateforme pour un PLU thermique (séminaire 10 juillet 2013). Paris: Atelier Parisien d’Urbanisme (APUR).
APUR. 2014. Un Plan Local Energie (PLE) pour Paris et la métropole (Note N°81). Paris: APUR.
Barry, Andrew. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. Chichester: Wiley.
Barry, Andrew. 2015. Thermodynamics, Matter, Politics. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 110–125.
Baupin, Denis, and Hélène Gassin. 2009. Concessions de distribution électrique à ERDF : retours sur l’expérience parisienne. Paris: Mairie de Paris.
Berghmans, Nicolas, and Andreas Rüdinger. 2017. Pour ne pas subir la transition, inventer le système électrique de demain. La Tribune, 16 June 2017. https://www.latribune.fr/opinions/tribunes/pour-ne-pas-subir-la-transition-inventer-le-systeme-electrique-de-demain-738245.html.
Bezat, Jean-Michel. 2010. La chambre régionale des comptes reproche à EDF d’avoir sous-investi dans la capitale. Le Monde, 28 September 2010.
Braun, Bruce, and Sarah Whatmore (eds.). 2010. Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bridge, Gavin, Stefan Bouzarovski, Michael Bradshaw, and Nick Eyre. 2013. Geographies of Energy Transition: Space, Place and the Low-Carbon Economy. Energy Policy 53: 331–340.
Bulkeley, H., V. Castan Broto, M. Hodson, and S. Marvin (eds.). 2011. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge.
Bulkeley, Harriet, Pauline McGuirk, and Robyn Dowling. 2016. Making a Smart City for the Smart Grid? The Urban Material Politics of Actualising Smart Electricity Networks. Environment and Planning A 48 (9): 1709–1726.
Chambre Régionale des Comptes d’Ile-de-France. 2010. Rapport d’observations définitives - Ville de Paris: Délégation du service public de distribution de l’énergie électrique dans Paris, exercices 2003 et suivants. Paris: Chambre Régionale des Comptes d’Ile-de-France.
Conseil Régional d’Ile-de-France, and Prefet de la Région d’Ile-de-France. 2012. Schéma Régional du Climat, de l’Air et de l’Energie (SRCAE) de l’Île-de-France. Paris: Conseil Régional d’Ile-de-France and Prefet de la Région d’Ile-de-France.
Cour des Comptes. 2013. Rapport public annuel 2013—Les concessions de distribution d’électricité: une organisation à simplifier, des investissements à financer. Paris: Cour des Comptes.
Energie 2007. 2009. Concession de la Ville de Paris: entretien avec Denis Baupin. Paris. http://energie2007.fr/.
Fabrégat, Sophie. 2013. Consommation électrique: une exception française peu durable. Actu-environnement, 22 January 2013. https://www.actu-environnement.com/ae/news/consommation-production-electricite-charbon-pointe-17587.php4.
FNCCR. 2015. Guide l’élu local et intercommunal: énergies. Paris: FNCCR (Fédération nationale des collectivités concédantes et régies).
Ged, Anne. 2015. Perspectives on Transition Pathways in Paris. Paris: Agence Parisienne du Climat (APC).
Greenpeace. 2014. Le coût de production futur du nucléaire exploité au-delà de 40 ans. Paris: Greenpeace France.
Gueugneau, Christophe, and Jade Lindgaard. 2015. Energie: le rapport caché sur une France 100% renouvelable. Mediapart, 8 April 2015. https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/080415/energie-le-rapport-cache-sur-une-france-100-renouvelable?page_article=1.
Hecht, Gabrielle. 1998. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Juilliard, Jean-François. 2013. Madame Duflot, vous devez interdire le chauffage électrique! Libération, 25 January 2013. https://www.liberation.fr/terre/2013/01/25/madame-duflot-vous-devez-interdire-le-chauffage-electrique_876155.
Le Ngoc, Boris. 2017. Le chauffage électrique, talon d’Achille ou idée reçue? Revue Générale Nucléaire (SFEN), 31 January 2017. http://www.sfen.org/rgn/chauffage-electrique-talon-achille-idee-recue.
Lelievre, Adrian. 2017. Le radiateur électrique, l’autre exception française. Les Echos, 25 January 2017. https://www.lesechos.fr/25/01/2017/lesechos.fr/0211703876444_le-radiateur-electrique–l-autre-exception-francaise.htm.
Mairie de Paris. 2012a. Bilan du Plan Climat 2007–2012. Paris: Mairie de Paris.
Mairie de Paris. 2012b. Plan Climat Energie de Paris: Grandes Orientations. Paris: Mairie de Paris.
MAM. 2015. The Electricity Fairy by Dufy. Paris: Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris. http://parismusees.paris.fr/en/oeuvre/electricity-fairy-dufy-musee-dart-moderne.
MAM. 2018. La fée électricité. Paris: Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris. http://www.mam.paris.fr/en/oeuvre/la-fee-electricite.
Mattelart, Armand. 1999. Mapping Modernity: Utopia and Communications Networks. In Mappings, ed. D. Cosgrove. London: Reaktion Books.
NégaWatt. 2009a. La pointe d’électricité en France… zéro pointé! (dossier de presse). Paris: Association NégaWatt.
NégaWatt. 2009b. Pointe électrique en France: “l’absurde conjugaison du nucléaire et du chauffage électrique”. Le Moniteur, 8 December 2009. https://www.lemoniteur.fr/article/pointe-electrique-en-france-l-absurde-conjugaison-du-nucleaire-et-du-chauffage-electrique.1489024.
RTE. 2012. Bilan électrique 2012. Paris: RTE.
Rutherford, Jonathan, and Olivier Coutard. 2014. Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-Technical Change. Urban Studies 51 (7): 1353–1377.
Sinaï, Agnès. 2015. 100% d’électricité renouvelable en 2050, l’étude de l’Ademe qui dérange. Actu-environnement, 8 April 2015. https://www.actu-environnement.com/ae/news/etude-ademe-100-pourcents-electricite-renouvelable-2050-24292.php4.
Topçu, Sezin. 2013. La France nucléaire: l’art de gouverner une technologie contestée. Paris: Le Seuil.
Ville de Paris, ERDF, and EDF. 2009. Avenant n°6 au traité de concession du 30 juillet 1955 pour la distribution de l’énergie électrique dans Paris. Paris: Ville de Paris, ERDF and EDF.
Weiler, Nolwenn. 2016. Très coûteux, polluant et inefficace: l’absurdité française du chauffage électrique. Basta!, 13 December 2016. https://www.bastamag.net/Precarite-energetique-surcout-emissions-carbone-l-absurdite-francaise-du.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rutherford, J. (2020). Active Infrastructures and the Spirit of Energy Transition in Paris. In: Redeploying Urban Infrastructure. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17887-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17887-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17886-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17887-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)