Skip to main content

Railway Stations in Creating the Competitive Advantage of Agglomeration Public Transport

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges of Urban Mobility, Transport Companies and Systems (TranSopot 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1187 Accesses

Abstract

The share of individual motorization in everyday commuting still increases. This situation is dictated by the fact that alternative ways of urban transportation are still not competitive, especially due to the time and convenience of moving in a “door-to-door” relation. Railways are the fastest means of agglomeration transport; however, very often the time benefits achieved during the travel are lost at interchange points. Thus, one of the key factors is railway stations and stops, which very often are a barrier to pedestrian traffic and do not fully utilize their integration potential in the passenger transport system. The aim of the chapter is to present a new Railways Stations Strategy with a new categorization of railway stations managed by Polish State Railways (PKP SA) and to show the contribution of this strategy to creating the competitiveness of alternative solutions in urban transport in relation to individual motorization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: Green paper—towards a new culture for urban mobility (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gdanskie Badanie Ruchu: Report of City of Gdansk. Available from: http://www.gdansk.pl/urzad-miejski/Wyniki-Gdanskiego-Badania-Ruchu-2016,a,65107 (2016)

  3. The Gallup Organization for European Commission: Future of transport. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 312 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guglielmetti Mugion, R., Toni, M., Raharjo, H., Di Pietro, L., Petros Sebathu, S.: Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility? J. Clean. Prod. 174, 1566–1587 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wyszomirski, O. (ed.): Zarządzanie komunikacją miejską. Gdanska Fundacja Kształcenia Menadżerów, Gdansk (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaberek-Karwacka, G.: Determinants of bicycle-commuting behavior diffusion model—Gdansk case study. Presentation at the 6th EUGEO Congress on the Geography of Europe, Brussels, 4–6 Sept (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. He, M., Zhao, S., He, M.: Tolerance threshold of commuting time: evidence from Kunming, China. J. Transp. Geogr. 57, 1–7 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent-Geslina, S., Ravalet, E.: Determinants of extreme commuting. Evidence from Brussels, Geneva and Lyon. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 240–247 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szołtysek, J.: Kreowanie mobilności mieszkańców miast. Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broniarska, Z., Zakowska, L.: Multi-criteria evaluation of public transport interchanges. Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 25–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kujala, R., Weckström, C., Mladenović, M.N., Saramäki, J.: Travel times and transfers in public transport: comprehensive accessibility analysis based on Pareto-optimal journeys. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 67, 41–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loisa, D., Monzón, A., Hernández, S.: Analysis of satisfaction factors at urban transport interchanges: measuring travellers’ attitudes to information, security and waiting. Transp. Policy (in press) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaberek-Karwacka, G.: Organizational and infrastructural solutions in creating competitive advantage of sustainable urban transport—Gdansk case study. Presentation at the Conference “Organizowanie Współczesnej Przestrzeni Miejskiej”, Warszawa, 24–25 Nov (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. NICHES: Efficient Planning and Use of Infrastructure and Interchanges. Guidelines for Implementers of Passenger Friendly Interchanges. https://www.polisnetwork.eu/publicdocuments/download/1727/document/21582_policynoteswg2_1_low.pdf

  15. NICHES: Innovative Urban Transport Concepts Moving from Theory to Practice. http://www.rupprechtconsult.eu/uploads/tx_rupprecht/NICHES_overview_concepts_EN.pdf

  16. Ge, Y., Jabbari, P., Mackenzie, D., Tao, J.: Effects of a public real-time multi-modal transportation information display on travel behavior and attitudes. J. Public Transp. 20(2), 40–65 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto, T., Hidaka, K.: Evaluation the effect of mobile information services for public transportation through the empirical research on commuter trains. Technol. Soc. 43, 144–158 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tovey, M., Woodcock, A., Osmond, J. (eds.): Designing Mobility and Transport Services. Routledge, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Commission Staff Working Document: Towards a roadmap for delivering EU-wide multimodal travel information, planning and ticketing services, Brussels (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hernández, S., Monzón, A.: Key factors for defining an efficient urban transport interchange: users’ perceptions. Cities 50, 158–167 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dźwigoń, W.: Analysis of transition times of pedestrians and passengers in an interchange node. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 92, 31–40 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olszewski, P., Krukowska, H., Krukowski, P.: Metodyka oceny wskaźnikowej węzłów przesiadkowych transportu publicznego. Transport miejski i regionalny 6, 4–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Cecín, P., dell’Olio, F.: Willingness to pay for improving service quality in a multimodal area. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19(6), 1060–1070 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. European Commission: European vision for passengers: communication on passenger rights in all transport modes (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Millward Brown: Jakościowe badanie eksploracyjne użytkowników dworców (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. European Commission: Commission regulation (EU) No. 1300/2014 of 18 November 2014 on the technical specifications for interoperability relating to accessibility of the Union’s rail system for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Millward Brown: Raport z IV fali Badania satysfakcji z podróży w pociągach PKP Intercity (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. POLIS: https://www.polisnetwork.eu/about/about-polis

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grazyna Chaberek-Karwacka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chaberek-Karwacka, G., Chrzanowski, M. (2019). Railway Stations in Creating the Competitive Advantage of Agglomeration Public Transport. In: Suchanek, M. (eds) Challenges of Urban Mobility, Transport Companies and Systems. TranSopot 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17743-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics