Abstract
It is known that existing protocols and the architecture of the Internet are inefficient for WSNs. Recently, the IETF has developed a set of IP-based protocols for 6LoWPAN networks through the 6LoWPAN and ROLL working groups [1]. One of the main protocols is RPL [2] which is expected to be the standard routing protocol for 6LoWPAN networks [3]. Many metrics have been proposed to be used with RPL that can be divided into link and node metrics, e.g. hop count, expected transmission count (ETX), node energy, latency, link quality and throughput [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zhang T, Li X (2014) Evaluating and analyzing the performance of RPL in contiki. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on mobile sensing, computing and communication, ACM, pp 19–24
Winter T, Thubert P, Brandt A, Hui J, Kelsey R (2012) RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. IETF, RFC 6550
Gaddour O, Koubâa A, Baccour N, Abid M (2014) OF-FL: QoS-aware fuzzy logic objective function for the RPL routing protocol. In: Proceedings of 12th international symposium on modeling and optimization in mobile, Ad hoc, and wireless networks (WiOpt). IEEE, pp 365–372
Vasseur J-P, Kim M, Pister K, Dejean N, Barthel D (2012) Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6551
Thubert P (2012) Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL). RFC 6552
Gnawali O, Levis P (2010) The ETX objective function for RPL. Internet draft: draft-gnawali-roll-etxof-00
Gonizzi P, Monica R, Ferrari G (2013) Design and evaluation of a delay-efficient RPL routing metric. In: Proceedings of 9th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC). IEEE, pp 1573–1577
Kamgueu PO, Nataf E, Ndié TD, Festor O (2013) Energy-based routing metric for RPL. [Research report] RR-8208, INRIA, 14
Karkazis P, Leligou HC, Sarakis L, Zahariadis T, Trakadas P, Velivassaki TH, Capsalis C (2012) Design of primary and composite routing metrics for RPL-compliant wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of international conference on telecommunications and multimedia (TEMU). IEEE, pp 13–18
Di Marco P, Fischione C, Athanasiou G, Mekikis P-V (2013) MAC-aware routing metrics for low power and lossy networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, pp 13–14
Moeller S, Sridharan A, Krishnamachari B, Gnawali O (2010) Routing without routes: the backpressure collection protocol. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on information processing in sensor networks. ACM, pp 279–290
Xiao W, Liu J, Jiang N, Shi H (2014) An optimization of the object function for routing protocol of low-power and lossy networks. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on systems and informatics (ICSAI). IEEE, pp 515–519
Tang W, Ma X, Huang J, Wei J (2015) Toward improved RPL: a congestion avoidance multipath routing protocol with time factor for wireless sensor networks. J Sens 2016
Levis P, Clausen T, Hui J, Gnawali O, Ko J (2011) The trickle algorithm. Internet engineering task force, RFC 6206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Kashoash, H. (2020). Congestion-Aware Routing Protocol for 6LoWPANs. In: Congestion Control for 6LoWPAN Wireless Sensor Networks: Toward the Internet of Things. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17732-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17732-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17731-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17732-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)