Abstract
Each night, to save her own life, Shahrazad is spared by her discursive skill, able to persuading a murderous ruler to stay her arbitrary execution. This ancient story, from the 1001 Nights, is a potent metaphor for disarmament advocacy, which seeks to persuade violent people to moderate their behavior. Traditional international relations (IR) scholarship has focused on the role of “hard power”—military and economic might—as the driver of change in the global system. However, academics and practitioners are increasingly realizing the role of narrative, stories and imagination in shaping what is seen as possible. In demonstrating the power of disarmament activists’ persuasion, this chapter highlights and reviews the insights of the “discursive turn” for IR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I adapt the wording of the framing text (in italics) here from Haddawy’s (1990) translation.
References
ACBL. (1998). Annual Report 1998. Retrieved from http://www.afghandata.org:8080/xmlui/handle/azu/7338
ACBL. (2000). Annual Report 2000. Retrieved from http://www.afghandata.org:8080/xmlui/handle/azu/7339
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities (Rev. ed.). New York: Verso.
Barnes, P. (2000). The Arabian Nights. Part 1. London: BBC.
Biswas, S. (2014). Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bliesmann de Guevara, B. (2016). Myth in International Politics: Ideological Delusion and Necessary Fiction. In B. Bliesmann de Guevara (Ed.), Myth and Narrative in International Politics: Interpretive Approaches to the Study of IR (pp. 15–46). New York: Springer.
Bolton, M. (2010). Foreign Aid and Landmine Clearance: Governance, Politics and Security in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Sudan. London: I.B. Tauris.
Bolton, M. (2015). From Minefields to Minespace: An Archeology of the Changing Architecture of Autonomous Killing in US Army Field Manuals on Landmines, Booby Traps and IEDs. Political Geography, 46, 41–53.
Bolton, M., & James, K. (2014). Nascent Spirit of New York or Ghost of Arms Control Past?: The Normative Implications of the Arms Trade Treaty for Global Policymaking. Global Policy, 5(4), 439–452.
Bolton, M., & Minor, E. (2016). The Discursive Turn Arrives in Turtle Bay: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons’ Operationalization of Critical IR Theories. Global Policy, 7(3), 386–395.
Bolton, M., & Mitchell, C. (2014, August). The Peloponnesian War and Killer Robots: Norms of Protection in Security Policy. e-International Relations. Retrieved February 18, 2017, from http://www.e-ir.info/2014/08/29/the-peloponnesian-war-and-killer-robots-norms-of-protection-in-security-policy/
Bolton, M., Sakamoto, E., & Griffiths, H. (2012, February). Globalization and the Kalashnikov: Public-Private Networks in the Proliferation and Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons. Global Policy, 3(3), 303–313.
Bousquet, A., Grove, J., & Shah, N. (2017). Becoming Weapon: An Opening Call to Arms. Critical Studies on Security, 5(1), 1–8.
Carpenter, C. (2016). Rethinking the Political/-Science-/Fiction Nexus: Global Policy Making and the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), 53–69.
Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs, 12(4), 687–718.
Cooper, N. (2018). Race, Sovereignty, and Free Trade: Arms Trade Regulation and Humanitarian Arms Control in the Age of Empire. Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(4), 444–462.
Das, R. (2017). A Post-colonial Analysis of India–United States Nuclear Security: Orientalism, Discourse, and Identity in International Relations. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(6), 741–759.
Davies, B., & Davies, C. (2007). Having and Being Had By, “Experience”: Or, “Experience” in the Social Sciences After the Discursive/Poststructuralist Turn. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1139–1159.
Der Derian, J. (2008). Critical Encounters in International Relations. International Social Science Journal, 59(191), 69–73.
Eichler, M. (2014). Militarized Masculinities in International Relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 81–94.
Foucault, M. (2003). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Macmillan.
Graham, S. (2016). Vertical: The City From Satellites to Bunkers. New York: Verso.
Grayson, K., Davies, M., & Philpott, S. (2009). Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics, 29(3), 156–157.
Gusterson, H. (1998). Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haddawy, H. (1990). The Arabian Nights. New York: W.W. Norton.
Herscher, A. (2008). Warchitectural Theory. Journal of Architectural Education, 61(3), 35–43.
Jameson, F. (1998). The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983–1998. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Mansfield, I. (2015). Stepping into a Minefield: A Life Dedicated to Landmine Clearance around the World. Newport: Big Sky Publishing.
Mathur, R. (2016). Sly Civility and the Paradox of Equality/Inequality in the Nuclear Order: A Post-Colonial Critique. Critical Studies on Security, 1(4), 57–72.
Mathur, R. (2018). Techno-Racial Dynamics of Denial & Difference in Weapons Control. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 297–313.
Moser-Puangsuwan, Y. (2008). Outside the Treaty Not the Norm: Nonstate Armed Groups and the Landmine Ban. In J. Williams, S. D. Goose, & M. Wareham (Eds.), Banning Landmines: Disarmament, Citizen Diplomacy and Human Security. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nichols, M. (2018). ‘You’ll Be Sorry,’ Russia Tells Britain at U.N. Nerve Agent Attack Meeting. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-russia-salisbury-un/youll-be-sorry-russia-tells-britain-at-u-n-nerve-agent-attack-meeting-idUSKCN1HC2M2?utm_source=applenews
Nobel Prize. (2017). 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1daV8n6fTY
Paolini, A. J. (1993). Foucault, Realism and the Power Discourse in International Relations. Australian Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 98–117.
p’Bitek, O. (1986). Artist the Ruler: Essays on Art, Culture and Values. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, Ltd.
Price, R. (1995). A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization, 49(1), 73–103.
Roy, A. (1998). The End of Imagination. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://ratical.org/ratville/nukes/endOfImagine.html
Said, E. (2012). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
Shelley, P. B. (2009). A Defence of Poetry. Poetry Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69388/a-defence-of-poetry
Stavrianakis, A. (2019). Controlling Weapons Circulation in a Postcolonial Militarized World. Review of International Studies, 45(1), 57–76.
Thurlow, S. (2017). International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)—Nobel Lecture (English). Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2017/ican/26041-international-campaign-to-abolish-nuclear-weapons-ican-nobel-lecture-2017/
Virilio, P. (1997). Bunker Archaeology. New Haven, CT: Princeton Architectural Press.
Weizman, E. (2012). Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. New York: Verso.
Welty, E. (2016). The Theological Landscape of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: The Catholic Church, the World Council of Churches and the Bomb. Global Policy, 7(3), 396–404.
Whitehead, N., & Finnstrom, S. (Eds.). (2013). Virtual War and Magical Death: Technologies and Imaginaries for Terror and Killing. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolton, M.B. (2020). Act 1. Shahrazad: Disarming Charm. In: Imagining Disarmament, Enchanting International Relations. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17716-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17716-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17715-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17716-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)