Skip to main content

L.I. Mandelstam’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in the Context of the Discussions of the 1930–1940s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics
  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

Operationalism is only one aspect of the philosophy developed by L.I. Mandelstam. This philosophy cannot be characterized without explaining his attitude to one of the most controversial problems of twentieth-century physics, namely to the problem of the interpretation of quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tamm spoke in favor of the Copenhagen interpretation in his early paper [331]. The Copenhagen approach to quantum theory was well known among Soviet physicists mainly due to [151].

  2. 2.

    Blokhintsev’s book [51] was rather popular in the USSR.

  3. 3.

    (1) Interview with S.M. Ryrtov; (2) The Archives of Lebedev Physics Institute (FIAN) contain a copy of the director 1937 order to give a bonus to Nikolsky for his contribution to the foundations of quantum mechanics.

  4. 4.

    Objectivism in the philosophy of quantum mechanics should not be mixed with materialism and even realism. About the structure of the concept “objectivity” see [86].

  5. 5.

    American proponents of the ensemble interpretation were also influenced by operationalism: see Kemble’s writings [175]. Slater prepared his Ph.D. thesis under Bridgman and attended Kemble’s lectures. Kemble also started under Bridgman [309]. Margenau criticized Bridgman’s operationalism, but he was also influenced by this philosophy. There are cross-references in American writings about the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics [122, 173–175, 319–321]. Kemble, Slater, Nikolsky implicitly proceeded from the ontology of particles (about this ontology see: [132]).

  6. 6.

    As a matter of facts, the Soviet science is separated from Western science in the writings of Sovietologists (see, for example, [145, 146]). A. Vucinich provides a more tacit estimation: He points to the Soviet scientists’ opposition to dialectical materialism [378].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Pechenkin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pechenkin, A. (2019). L.I. Mandelstam’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in the Context of the Discussions of the 1930–1940s. In: L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17685-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics