Abstract
Humans were once considered to be microsmatic, but recent research suggests that we can use our sense of smell to detect important, socially relevant information about conspecifics. However, much of the research conducted to-date has investigated natural, fragrance free human body odours. While this is important in order to understand the evolution of olfactory communication in humans, it fails to account for the current (and historical) widespread use of artificial fragrances. In this chapter, we outline ways in which extraneous artificial fragrances may augment the underlying body odour, or ‘odour space’ of an individual, and how this might influence the perception of socially relevant information. In doing so, we describe some specific mechanisms for the interaction between body odours and artificial fragrances (blending and masking) and we discuss some recent work which has attempted to distinguish between these mechanisms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allen C, Cobey KD, Havlíček J, Roberts SC (2016) The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor. Evol Hum Behav 37:481–489
Allen C, Havlíček J, Roberts SC (2015) Effect of fragrance use on discrimination of individual body odor. Front Psychol 6:1115
Botwin MD, Buss DM, Shackelford TK (1997) Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. J Pers 65(1):107–136
Cernoch JM, Porter RH (1985) Recognition of maternal axillary odors by infants. Child Dev 56:1593–1598
Chen D, Haviland-Jones J (2000) Human olfactory communication of emotion. Percept Mot Skills 91:771–781
Clarke PMR, Barrett L, Henzi SP (2009) What role do olfactory cues play in chacma baboon mating? Am J Primatol 71:493–502
Cooper MD, Alder MN (2006) The evolution of adaptive immune systems. Cell 124:815–822
de Groot JH, Smeets MA (2017) Human fear chemosignaling: evidence from a meta-analysis. Chem Senses 42(8):663–673
de Lacy Costello B, Amann A, Al-Kateb H, Flynn C, Filipiak W, Khalid T, … Ratcliffe NM (2014) A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. J Breath Res 8:14001
Ferdenzi C, Schaal B, Roberts SC (2010) Family scents: developmental changes in the perception of kin body odor? J Chem Ecol 36:847–854
Fialová J, Havlíček J (2012) Perception of emotion-related odours in humans. Anthropologie 50:95–110
Fialová J, Roberts SC, Havlíček J (2013) Is the perception of dietary odour cues linked to sexual selection in humans? In: East ML, Denhard M (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates XII. Springer, New York, pp 161–170
Gaby JM, Zayas V (2017) Smelling is telling: Human olfactory cues influence social judgments in semi-realistic interactions. Chem Senses 42:405–418
Hämmerli A, Schweisgut C, Kaegi M (2012) Population genetic segmentation of MHC-correlated perfume preferences. Int J Cosmet Sci 34:161–168
Havlíček J, Dvorakova R, Bartos L, Flegr J (2006) Non-advertized does not mean concealed: body odour changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology 112:81–90
Havlíček J, Fialová J, Roberts SC (2017) Individual variation in body odour. In: Buettner A (ed) Springer handbook of odor. Springer, New York, pp 943–955
Havlíček J, Lenochova P (2006) The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness. Chem Senses 31:747–752
Havlíček J, Roberts SC (2009) MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34:497–512
Havlíček J, Roberts SC (2013) The perfume-body odour complex: an insightful model for culture-gene coevolution? In: East ML, Dehnhard M (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates XII. Springer, New York, pp 185–195
Havlíček J, Roberts SC, Flegr J (2005) Women’s preference for dominant male odor: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Let 1:256–259
Havlíček J, Saxton TK, Roberts SC, Jozifkova E, Lhota S, Valentova J, Flegr J (2008) He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate-choice contexts. Pers Individ Differg 45:565–570
Higuchi T, Shoji K, Taguchi S, Hatayama T (2005) Improvement of nonverbal behaviour in Japanese female perfume-wearers. Int J Psychol 40:90–99
Huck WU, Banks EM, Wang S (1981) Olfactory discrimination of social status in the brown lemming. Behav Neural Biol 33:364–371
Ilmonen P, Stundner G, Thoss M, Penn DJ (2009) Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity? BMC Evol Biol 9:104
Kelley J, Walter L, Trowsdale J (2005) Comparative genomics of natural killer cell receptor gene clusters. PLoS Genet 1:129–139
Lenochová P, Vohnoutová P, Roberts SC, Oberzaucher E, Grammer K, Havlíček J (2012) Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice. PLoS ONE 7:e33810
Lindqvist A (2012) How is commercial gender categorization of perfumes related to consumers preference of fragrances? Proc Soc Behav Sci 65:370–374
Little AC, Connely J, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Roberts SC (2011) Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behav Ecol 22:862–868
Lord T, Kasprzak M (1989) Identification of self through olfaction. Percept Mot Skills 69:219–224
McGann JP (2017) Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science 356(6338)
Miranda A, Almeida OG, Hubbard PC, Barata EN, Canário AVM (2005) Olfactory discrimination of female reproductive status by male tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). J Exp Biol 208:2037–2043
Milinski M, Wedekind C (2001) Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. Behav Ecol 12:140–149
Moshkin M, Litvinova N, Litvinova EA, Bedareva A, Lutsyuk A, Gerlinskaya L (2012) Scent recognition of infected status in humans. J Sex Med 9:3211–3218
Olsson MJ, Lundström JN, Kimball BA, Gordon AR, Karshikoff B, Hosseini N, Sorjonen K, Olgart Höglund C, Solares C, Soop A, Axelsson J (2014) The scent of disease: human body odor contains an early chemosensory cue of sickness. Psychol Sci 25:817–823
Penn DJ, Oberzaucher E, Grammer K, Fischer G, Soini HA, Wiesler D, …, Brereton RG (2007) Individual and gender fingerprints in human body odour. J R Soc Interface 4:331–340
Plotkin HC (2010) Evolutionary worlds without end. Oxford University Press, USA
Porter RH, Cernoch JM, Balogh RD (1985) Odour signatures and kin recognition. Physiol Behav 34:445–448
Porter RH, Cernoch JM, McLaughlin FJ (1983) Maternal recognition of neonates through olfactory cues. Physiol Behav 30:151–154
Rhodes G, Hickford C, Jeffery L (2000) Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? Br J Psychol 91:125–140
Rich TJ, Hurst JL (1998) Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates. Anim Behav 56:727–735
Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Carter V, Petrie M (2008) MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceed Royal Soc B 275:2715–2722
Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Spector TD, Miller P, Penn DJ, Petrie M (2005) Body odor similarity in noncohabiting twins. Chem Senses 30:651–656
Roberts SC, Havlíček J (2012) Evolutionary psychology and perfume design. In: Roberts SC (ed) Applied evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 330–348
Roberts SC, Little AC, Lyndon A, Roberts J, Havlíček J, Wright RL (2009) Manipulation of body odour alters men’s self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int J Cosmet Sci 31:47–54
Roberts SC, Miner EJ, Shackelford TK (2010) The future of an applied evolutionary psychology for human partnerships. Rev Gen Psychol 14:318–329
Russell MJ (1976) Human olfactory communication. Nature 260:520–522
Ruther J, Matschke M, Garbe L, Steiner S (2009) Quantity matters: Male sex pheromone signals mate quality in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 276:3303–3310
Schaal B, Porter R (1991) “Microsmatic humans” revisited: the generation and perception of chemical signals. Adv Study Behav 20:135–199
Schleidt M, Hold B, Attili G (1981) A cross-cultural study on the attitude towards personal odors. J Chem Ecol 7:19–31
Sczesny S, Stahlberg D (2002) The influence of gender-stereotyped perfumes on leadership attribution. Eur J Soc Psychol 32:815–828
Singh D, Bronstad PM (2001) Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 268:797–801
Sobotková M, Fialová J, Roberts SC, Havlíček J (2017) Effect of biological relatedness on perfume selection for others: preliminary evidence. Perception 46:498–515
Sommerville BA, Wobst B, McCormick JP, Eggert F, Zavazava N, Broom DM (1994) Volatile identity signals in human axillary sweat: the possible influence of MHC class I genes. Adv Biosci 93:535–538
Sorokowska A (2013) Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli. Pers Individ Differ 55:175–179
Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Havlíček J (2016) Body odor based personality judgments: the effect of fragranced cosmetics. Front Psychol 7:530
Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Szmajke A (2012) Does personality smell? Accuracy of personality assessments based on body odour. Eur J Pers 26:496–503
Stoddart M (1990) The scented ape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wedekind C, Füri S (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 264:1471–1479
Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ (1995) MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 260:245–249
Weisfeld GE, Czilli T, Phillips KA, Gall JA, Lichtman CM (2003) Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. J Exp Child Psychol 85:279–295
Winternitz J, Abbate JL, Huchard E, Havlícek J, Garamszegi LZ (2017) Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis. Mole Ecol 26(2):668–688
Wyatt TD (2015) The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 282:20142994
Acknowledgements
JH is supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant [18-15168S].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Allen, C., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S.C. (2019). The Effects of Artificial Fragrances on Human Olfactory Communication. In: Buesching, C. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17616-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17616-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17615-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17616-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)