Skip to main content

Regulatory Expectations of Offended Audiences: The Citizen Interest in Audience Discourse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter analyses fieldwork with 90 people in the UK and Germany, exploring the expectations audiences articulate about regulatory processes behind television content they find offensive. First, mapping people’s responses on to the conceptual pairing of citizens and consumers, we find audiences aligning themselves with citizen interests, even when, often on the surface, they respond to media regulation and institutions with suspicion. Second, we find that complaints that make it to media regulators are just the tip of the iceberg. Third, in investigating people’s expectations of actors and institutions in their responses to television content that startles, upsets, or just offends them, we note that it is crucial to treat a conversation on free speech and censorship with caution.

A version of this chapter has been previously published in: Communication, Culture and Critique 2017, 10 (4): 626–640.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, Marc. 2009. Violent Affect: Literature, Cinema and Critique After Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARD. 2016. Freundinnen—Alle für eine | Filme im Ersten Video | ARD Mediathek. ardmediathek.de. Retrieved 4 May 2017 from http://www.ardmediathek.de/tv/Filme-im-Ersten/Freundinnen-Alle-f%C3%BCr-eine/Das-Erste/Video?bcastId=1933898&documentId=40606276.

  • ARD Mediathek. 2016. Uschi Glas—Ich weiß, wo ich herkomm’ | Lebenslinien Video | ARD Mediathek. ardmediathek.de. Retrieved 4 May 2017 from http://www.ardmediathek.de/tv/Lebenslinien/Uschi-Glas-Ich-wei%C3%9F-wo-ich-herkomm/BR-Fernsehen/Video?bcastId=14913740&documentId=38937414.

  • Attwood, F., V. Campbell, and I. Q. Hunter. 2012. Controversial Images: Media Representations on the Edge. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Board of Film Certification (BBFC). 2005. Public Opinion and BBFC Guidelines. London: BBFC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brottman, M. 1997. Offensive Films: Toward an Anthropology of Cinema Vomitif. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. 1980. The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberbatch, G., S. Gauntlett, and V. Littlejohns. 2003. A Content Analysis of Sexual Activity and Nudity on British Terrestrial Television. London, England: BBC, BSC, and ITC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilders, C., U. Hasebrink, and A. Herzog. 2006. “Das aktive Publikum. Instituionalisierung zivilgesellschaftlicher Kontrolle des Fernsehens auf europäischer Ebene.” In Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel, edited by W. Langenbucher and M. Latzer, 330–351. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. 2011. “What Paddington Tells Us About German v British Manners—BBC News.” BBC News. Retrieved 24 February 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13545386.

  • Hargrave, A. Millwood, and S. Livingstone. 2009. Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Evidence. LSE Research Online. Bristol: Intellect Books. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-007-0058-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U. 1994. “Country Report Germany.” In Television and the Viewer Interest: Explorations in the Responsiveness of European Broadcasters, edited by J. Mitchell, J. G. Blumer, P. Mounier, and A. Bundschuh, 25–46. London, England: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U. 2011. “Giving the Audience a Voice: The Role of Research in Making Media Regulation More Responsive to the Needs of the Audience.” Journal of Information Policy 1: 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. 1997. Shocking Entertainment: Viewer Response to Violent Movies. Luton, England: University of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horz, C. 2016. “The Public: Consumers or Citizens? Participatory Initiatives and the Reform of Public Service Media Regulation in Germany.” Comunicação e Sociedade 30: 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. 1996. “Contrastive Discourse Analysis and Misunderstandings: The Case of German and English.” In Contrastive Sociolinguistics, edited by M. Hellinger and U. Ammon, 345–363. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janovich, M. 2002. Horror: The Film Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., and R. Das. 2009. Public Attitudes, Tastes and Standards: A Review of the Evidence. London, England: BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., and P. Lunt. 2007. “Representing Citizens and Consumers in Media and Communications Regulation.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611: 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., and P. Lunt. 2011. “The Implied Audience of Communications Policy Making: Regulating Media in the Interests of Citizens and Consumers.” In The Handbook of Media Audiences. Global Media and Communication Handbook Series (IAMCR), edited by V. Nightingale, 169–189. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., and P. Lunt. 2012. Media Regulation: Governance and the Interests of Citizen and Consumers. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., P. Lunt, and L. Miller. 2007. “Citizens, Consumers and the Citizen-Consumer: Articulating the Citizen Interest in Media and Communications Regulation.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, S., and M. Pickering. 2009. Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Communications (Ofcom). 2005. Language and Sexual Imagery in Broadcasting: A Contextual Investigation. London: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Communications (Ofcom). 2013. The Ofcom Broadcasting Code. London: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasonen, S. 2011. Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M., L. d’Haenens, and F. Saeys. 2007. “Broadcasting Policy and Regulatory Choices.” In Western Broadcast Models: Structure, Conduct and Performance, edited by F. Saeys and L. d’ Haenens, 61–78. Berlin, NY: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. 1992. Women Viewing Violence. London, England: British Film Institute (BFI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P., R. Haynes, and R. Boyle. 1998. Men Viewing Violence. London, England: Broadcasting Standards Commission (BBC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. G., and P. F. Phalen. 1994. “Victim, Consumer, or Commodity? Audience Models in Communication Policy.” In Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience, edited by J. S. Ettema and D. C. Whitney, 19–37. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. 1991. “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess.” Film Quarterly 44 (4): 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., ed. 2004. Porn Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjana Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, R., Graefer, A. (2019). Regulatory Expectations of Offended Audiences: The Citizen Interest in Audience Discourse. In: Graefer, A. (eds) Media and the Politics of Offence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics