Abstract
This Report has been prepared to assist the International Rapporteur in reporting to the LIDC congress in Budapest in October 2018. It has been prepared in accordance with the Directives and Instructions issued by LIDC, which was last amended in October 2016. It follows the structure of the questions for National Reporters that were issued in February 2018.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Section 52 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 2.
Section 53 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 3.
Section 54 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 4.
Section 55 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 5.
Section 92 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 6.
Section 93 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 7.
Section 94 of the Competition Ordinance
- 8.
Section 101 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 9.
Section 172 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 10.
Section 173 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 11.
Section 174 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 12.
Section 175 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 13.
The guidelines could be accessed at https://www.compcomm.hk/en/legislation_guidance/guidance/guidance.html. Accessed 28 August 2018.
- 14.
See sections 52, 53, 54, 55, 172, 173 and 174 of the Competition Ordinance.
- 15.
See among others, Re Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) 13 ATPR 41-076, at section 42, and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Visy Industries Holdings Pty Limited (No 3) (2007) FCA 1617, at section 303.
- 16.
See: among others, Re Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) 13 ATPR 41-076, at section 42, and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Visy Industries Holdings Pty Limited (No 3) (2007) FCA 1617, at section 303.
- 17.
See, for example, CFI, case T-112/05, Akzo Nobel NV & others v Commission, ECR 2007 II-5049.
- 18.
See also the definition in section 2(1) of the Competition Ordinance.
- 19.
Section 2.6 of the Guideline.
- 20.
Section 2.8 of the Guideline.
- 21.
See CFI, case T-112/05, Akzo Nobel NV & others v Commission, ECR 2007 II-5049.
- 22.
Section 2.37 of the Competition Commission’s Guideline on the First Conduct Rule.
- 23.
Footnote 15 of the Competition Commission’s Guideline on the First Conduct Rule.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lam, C., Xu, C., Cheung, T. (2019). Hong Kong. In: Këllezi, P., Kilpatrick, B., Kobel, P. (eds) Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution. LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17549-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17550-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)