Advertisement

Introduction

  • Sandra L. ResodihardjoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I present my argument that there is a danger that blame games dominate the accountability phase following a crisis, thereby negatively affecting the learning process as actors will be less inclined to share information. To ensure a more balanced accountability phase, it is important to better understand how blame games work because a better management of the blame game will allow more room to learn from the crisis. The chapter concludes with an outline of the book.

Keywords

Blame games Learning Accountability phase Balance 

References

  1. Birkland, T. A. (2009). Disasters, lessons learned, and fantasy documents. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(3), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brändström, A. (2016). Crisis, accountability and blame management: Strategies and survival of political office-holders (Vol. 44). Stockholm: CRISMART.Google Scholar
  3. Choularton, R. (2001). Complex learning: Organizational learning from disasters. Safety Science, 39(1–2), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Vries, M. S. (2004). Framing crises: Response patterns to explosions in fireworks factories. Administration & Society, 36(5), 594–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, D. (2009). The failure of organizational learning from crisis – A matter of life and death? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(3), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, D., & Smith, D. (2006). Cultural readjustment after crisis: Regulation and learning from crisis within the UK soccer industry. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenwood, J. (1998). The role of reflection in single and double loop learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(5), 1048–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guerin, B., McCrae, J., & Shepheard, M. (2018). Accountability in modern government: What are the issues? A discussion paper. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar
  9. Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2019). Blame, reputation, and organizational responses to a politicized climate. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination (pp. 133–150). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuipers, S., & ’t Hart, P. (2014). Accounting for crises. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 589–602). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Resodihardjo, S. L., Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Carroll, B. J. (2012). Mayor vs. police chief: The Hoek van Holland riot. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(4), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Resodihardjo, S. L., Carroll, B. J., Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Maris, S. (2016). Why traditional responses to blame games fail: The importance of context, rituals, and sub-blame games in the face of raves gone wrong. Public Administration, 94(2), 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Resodihardjo, S. L., Meijer, M., & Carroll, B. J. (2018a). Het monstertruckdrama in Haaksbergen en het vertrek van burgemeester Gerritsen. Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, 17(3), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Resodihardjo, S. L., Van Genugten, M., & Ruiter, M. N. (2018b). A theoretical exploration of resilience and effectiveness requirements’ compatibility in formal and permanent emergency networks. Safety Science, 101, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stark, A. (2010). Legislatures, legitimacy and crises: The relationship between representation and crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(1), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint commissions of inquiry? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weaver, R. K. (2018). The nays have it: How rampant blame generating distorts American policy and politics. Political Science Quarterly, 133(2), 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations