Abstract
This chapter provides an extensive overview of studies of a subsidiary’s roles. While concentrating on the functional responsibilities of a subsidiary, it presents various approaches to this issue. It refers to resource- and configuration-oriented research, discusses responsibility-oriented subsidiary role studies, and focuses on the latest analytical solution to the functional responsibilities of subsidiaries, namely, the subsidiary strategic role concept. Research on subsidiary roles is often perceived as homogeneous. However, the findings of this chapter indicate that it remains diversified in terms of the approaches applied to the functional responsibilities of a subsidiary. The modern approach toward the subsidiary strategic role concept opens new avenues for studies of the determinants of a subsidiary’s functional responsibilities.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The exact wording of the questionnaire referring to the mentioned variables is not provided in the paper. Thus, it is not possible to indicate all of the possible responses included between the extreme points of assessment. However, based on the discussion part of the paper, “adaptation of manufacturing technology with perhaps a minimal capability in product adaptation” (Taggart 1998, p. 673) was another feasible answer for R&D complexity evaluation.
- 2.
Both issues are mentioned only in reference to the export platform, a type of subsidiary role proposed in the paper. See Hogenbirk and Kranenburg (2006, p. 56).
- 3.
The term “functional responsibilities” is purposefully used here instead of “value chain functions.” Rugman et al. (2011) group the nine value chain functions proposed by Porter (1985) into four sets of functional responsibilities: (1) innovation (technology development); (2) production (including procurement, inbound logistics, and operations); (3) sales (including outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service); and (4) administrative functions (firm infrastructure, including financial and legal services and human resource management).
References
Achcaoucaou, Fariza, Paloma Miravitlles, and Fidel León-Darderb. 2014. Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness. International Business Review 23 (1): 76–90.
Anand, Rahul, Saurabh Mishra, and Nikola Spatafora. 2012. Structural transformation and the sophistication of production. IMF working paper 12/59, Washington, DC.
Bartlett, Christopher A., and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1986. Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review 64 (6): 87–94.
Birkinshaw, Julian M., and Allen J. Morrison. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (4): 729–754.
Birkinshaw, Julian M., and Torben Pedersen. 2009. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In The Oxford handbook of international business, ed. Alan M. Rugman, 2nd ed., 367–389. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bouquet, Ciril, and Julian M. Birkinshaw. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. The Academy of Management Journal 51 (3): 577–601.
Burger, Anže, Björn Jindra, Philipp Marek, and Matija Rojec. 2018. Functional upgrading and value capture of multinational subsidiaries. Journal of International Management 24 (2): 108–122.
Cantwell, John, and Ram Mudambi. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12): 1109–1128.
Cavanagh, Andrew, and Susan Freeman. 2012. The development of subsidiary roles in the motor vehicle manufacturing industry. International Business Review 21 (4): 602–617.
De Beule, Filip. 2011. Subsidiary strategic evolution in China. In Entrepreneurship in the global firm, Progress in international business research, ed. Alain Verbeke, T. Ana, and Rob Van Tulder, vol. 6, 199–222. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Delany, Ed. 2000. Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking. Long Range Planning 33 (2): 220–244.
Dörrenbächer, Christoph, and Jens Gammelgaard. 2006. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management 12 (3): 266–283.
———. 2010. Multinational corporations, inter-organizational networks and subsidiary charter removals. Journal of World Business 45 (3): 206–216.
Dzikowska, Marlena, and Ulf Andersson. 2018. A dynamic framework of subsidiary strategic roles. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the European International Business Academy, Poznań, December 13–15.
Enright, Michael J., and Venkat Subramanian. 2007. An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies. Management International Review 47 (6): 895–924.
Ferdows, Kasra. 1997. Making the most of foreign factories. Harvard Business Review 75 (2): 73–88.
Ghoshal, Sumantra. 1997. Of cakes, clothes, emperors and obituaries. In International business: An emerging vision, ed. Brian Toyne and Douglas Nigh, 361–376. Columbia: University of South California Press.
Giuliani, Elisa, Sara Gorgoni, Christina Günther, and Roberta Rabellotti. 2014. Emerging versus advanced country MNEs investing in Europe: A typology of subsidiary global–local connections. International Business Review 23 (4): 680–691.
Gupta, Anil K., and Vijay Govindarajan. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 768–792.
Harzing, Anne-Wil. 2000. An empirical test and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies 31 (1): 101–120.
Harzing, Anne-Wil, and Niels G. Noorderhaven. 2006. Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta & Govindarajan’s typology of subsidiary roles. International Business Review 15 (3): 195–214.
Hausmann, Ricardo, Jason Hwang, and Dani Rodrik. 2007. What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth 12 (1): 1–25.
Hobday, Michael, and Howard Rush. 2006. Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: The case of electronics in Thailand. Research Policy 36 (9): 1335–1356.
Hogenbirk, Annelies E., and Hans L. van Kranenburg. 2006. Roles of foreign owned subsidiaries in a small economy. International Business Review 15 (1): 53–67.
Jarillo, J. Carlos, and Jon I. Martinez. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal 11 (7): 501–512.
Jensen, Peter D., and Torben Pedersen. 2011. The economic geography of offshoring: The fit between activities and local context. Journal of Management Studies 48 (2): 352–372.
Jindra, Björn. 2005. A strategy view on knowledge in the MNE – Integrating subsidiary roles and knowledge flows. Journal of Economics and Business 8 (1–2): 43–71.
Lall, Sanjaya, John Weiss, and Jinkang Zhang. 2006. The sophistication of exports: A new measure of product characteristics. World Development 34 (2): 222–237.
Leong, Siew Meng, and Chin Tiong Tan. 1993. Managing across Borders: An empirical assessment of the Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) typology. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (3): 449–464.
Malnight, Thomas W. 1995. Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal 16 (2): 119–141.
Manolopoulos, Dimitris. 2008. A systematic review of the literature and theoretical analysis of subsidiary roles. Journal of Transnational Management 13 (1): 23–57.
Marcati, Alberto. 1989. Configuration and coordination: The role of US subsidiaries in the international network of Italian multinationals. Management International Review 29 (3): 35–50.
Mudambi, Ram. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (5): 699–725.
Mudambi, Ram, Torben Pedersen, and Ulf Andersson. 2014. How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business 49 (1): 101–113.
Nobel, Robert, and Julian M. Birkinshaw. 1998. Innovation n multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in International R&D Operations. Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 479–496.
Pananond, Pavida. 2013. Where do we go from Here?: Globalizing subsidiaries moving up the value chain. Journal of International Management 19 (3): 207–219.
Porter, Michael E. 1985. The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Qu, Riliang. 2007. The role of market orientation in the business success of MNCs’ UK subsidiaries. Management Decision 45 (7): 1181–1192.
Rugman, Alan M. 2001. The end of globalization: Why global strategy is a myth & how to profit from the realities of regional markets. New York: Amacom.
Rugman, Alan, and Alain Verbeke. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3): 237–250.
———. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (1): 3–18.
Rugman, Alan M., Alain Verbeke, and Wenlong Yuan. 2011. Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies 48 (2): 253–277.
Sass, Magdolna, and Andrea Szalavetz. 2013. Crisis and upgrading: The case of the Hungarian automotive and electronics sectors. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (3): 489–507.
Schmid, Stefan. 2004. The roles of foreign subsidiaries in network MNCs – A critical review of the literature and some directions for future research. In European research on foreign direct investment and international human resource management, ed. Jorma Larimo and Sami Rumpunen, 237–255. Vaasa: Vaasa yliopiston Julkaisuja.
Schmid, Stefan, and Andrea Daniel. 2007. Are subsidiary roles a matter of perception?: A review of the literature and avenues for future research. ESCP-EAP working paper, Berlin.
Schmid, Stefan, Iris Bäurle, and Michael Kutschker. 1998. Tochtergesellschaften in international tätigen Unternehmungen – Ein “State-of-the-Art” unterschiedlicher Rollentypologien. Diskussionsbeitrag (104), Katholische Universität Eichstätt: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Ingolstadt.
Schmid, Stefan, Philipp Grosche, and Ulrike Mayrhofer. 2016. Configuration and coordination of international marketing activities. International Business Review 25 (2): 535–547.
Scott, Pamela, and Patrick T. Gibbons. 2011. Emerging threats for MNC subsidiaries and the cycle of decline. Journal of Business Strategy 32 (1): 34–41.
Taggart, James H. 1997. Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 28 (1): 51–75.
———. 1998. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 19 (7): 663–681.
Tippmann, Esther, Pamela Sharkey Scott, Marty Reilly, and Donal O’Brien. 2018. Subsidiary coopetition competence: Navigating subsidiary evolution in the multinational corporation. Journal of World Business 53 (4): 540–554.
Tsai, Ming-Ten, Ming-Chu Yu, and Kuo-Wei Lee. 2006. Relationships between subsidiary strategic roles and organizational configuration: The case of Taiwanese multinational companies. International Journal of Commerce and Management 16 (1): 3–14.
Vereecke, Ann, and Roland Van Dierdonck. 2002. The strategic role of the plant: Testing Ferdows’s model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (5/6): 492–514.
Vereecke, Ann, Roland Van Dierdonck, and Arnoud De Meyer. 2006. A typology of plants in global manufacturing networks. Management Science 52 (11): 1737–1750.
Vereecke, Ann, Arnoud De Meyer, and Roland Van Dierdonck. 2008. The strategic role of the plant in international networks: A longitudinal study. Cambridge Judge Business School working paper series 09/2008.
Wang, Jue, Xiaming Liu, and Xiaoying Li. 2009. A dual-role typology of multinational subsidiaries. International Business Review 18 (6): 578–591.
White, Roderick E., and Thomas A. Poynter. 1984. Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly 49 (2): 59–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dzikowska, M. (2019). Functional Responsibilities in Subsidiary Role Studies: Literature Overview. In: The Role of the Subsidiary in International Business. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17527-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17527-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17526-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17527-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)