Advertisement

The Development of Documentary Film Festivals in India: A Small-Media Phenomenon

  • Giulia Battaglia
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Framing Film Festivals book series (FFF)

Abstract

This chapter addresses documentary film festivals in India as small-media practices. Although inscribed in a grounded local festival tradition, documentary film festivals in India multiplied and took a specific form with the advent of modern technologies throughout the decade of 2000s, which enabled practitioners to go beyond official festival circuits and state institutions. While scholars may address these practices as ‘alternative media,’ we can also frame them within what others have called ‘small-media’ practices. Documentary film festivals, conceived as also forms of ‘campaign’ or ‘protest,’ however, are yet to be integrated in such debate. As this chapter demonstrates, the 2004 Indian film festival and filmmakers campaign—‘Vikalp—Films for Freedom’—is one example that can help initiate this much-needed incorporation. This festival not only transformed the tradition of Indian documentary film festivals into a small-media practice but also created a community of filmmakers at a national level—who had until then been scattered across the country.

References

  1. Battaglia, Giulia. 2014. The Video Turn: Documentary Film Practices in 1980s India. Visual Anthropology 27 (1–2): 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2018. Documentary Film in India: An Anthropological History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Battaglia, Giulia, and Paolo Favero. 2014. Reflections Upon the Meaning of Contemporary Digital Image-making Practices in India. In Arts and Aesthetics in a Globalizing World, ed. Raminder Kaur and Parul Dave-Mukherji, 241–258. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Chanana, Openender. 1988. Documentary Today. Survival & Breakthrough. Cinema in India 2 (1): 34–36.Google Scholar
  5. Chatterjee, Partha. 1994. The Indian Documentary Scene Fraught with Hazards. Cinemaya: The Asian Film Quarterly 23 (Spring): 44–45.Google Scholar
  6. Couldry, Nick, and James Curran. 2003. Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Deprez, Camille. 2015. A Space in Between: The Legacy of the Activity Documentary Film in India. In Post-1990 Documentary: Reconfiguring Independence, ed. Camille Deprez and Judith Pernin. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dey, A.K. 1987. An Alternative Network. Film Societies Role. In Docu-Scene India, ed. Opender Chanana. Bombay: Indian Documentary Producers Association.Google Scholar
  9. Fox, Richard, and Orin Starn. 1997. Between Resistance and Revolution: Cultural Politics and Social Protest. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garga, B.D. 2007. From Raj to Swaraj. The Non-fiction Film in India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, P. Stephen. 2010. When Film Came to Madras. Bioscope 1 (2): 147–168.Google Scholar
  12. Iordanova, Dina, and Leshu Torchin. 2012. Film Festival Yearbook 4: Film Festivals and Activism. St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Kittler, Friedrich A. 1990. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lal, Vinay. 2005. Travails of the Nation. Some Notes on Indian Documentaries. Third Text 19 (2): 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larkin, Brian. 2008. Signal and Noise: Media, Infrastructure, and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mazzarella, William. 2013. Censorium: Cinema and the Open Edge of Mass Publicity. Delhi: Oriental BlackSwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohan, Jag. 1972. Dr. P.V. Pathy. Pune: National Film Archive of India.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1990. Documentary Films and National Awakening. New Delhi: Publications Division.Google Scholar
  20. Prabhu, V. Shrikant. 1990. Hope for the Non-Conformist. Documentary Festival in Retrospect. Deep Focus 3 (2): 47–50.Google Scholar
  21. Prabhu, V. Shrikant. 1992. The End of History and New Beginning in Cinema. Report on Bombay Documentary and Short Film Festival 1992. Deep Focus 4 (2): 68–72.Google Scholar
  22. Rao, H.N.Narahari. 2001. My Days with the Film Society Movement. Bangalore: Sibina Services.Google Scholar
  23. Reeves, Geoffrey. 1993. Communications and the “Third World”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Roy, Srirupa. 2007. Moving Pictures: The Films Division of India and the Visual Practices of the Nation State. In Beyond Belief: India and the Politics of Postcolonial Nationalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Spitulnik, Debra. 2002. Alternative Small Media and Communication Spaces. In Media and Democracy in Africa, ed. Göran Hydén, Michael Leslie, and Folu Folarin Ogundimu. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle, and Ali Mohammadi. 1994. Small Media, Big Revolution: Communication, Culture, and the Iranian Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sreberny, Annabelle, and Gholam Khiabany. 2010. Blogistan: The Internet and Politics in Iran. New York: I.B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thapa, N.S. 1985. The documentary Film in India. Films Division at Work. In 70 Years of Indian Cinema (1913–1983), ed. T.M. Ramachandran and S. Rukmini. Bombay: Cinema India-International.Google Scholar
  29. Waugh, Thomas. 2012. Miffed! Or ‘Grasping for [Polluted?] Air’. Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies 3 (1): 87–93.Google Scholar
  30. Zaidi, Shama. 1992. Catching the Wind. Cinema in India 3: 12–15.Google Scholar

Festival Catalogues, Non-academic Reviews and Reports

  1. Films for Freedom: A Say NO to Censorship Festival. 2004. Festival Booklet.Google Scholar
  2. The Hindu. 2003a, September 16. Film-makers to Boycott Mumbai Festival. 4.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2003b, September 19. No Censorship for Film Festival. 4.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2004, February 22. Positive Protest. 5.Google Scholar
  5. Hindustan Times. 2003, September 16. Filmmakers Protest Censorship in Fest. 5.Google Scholar
  6. The Indian Express. 2003a, September 17. Censor: MIFFed Filmmakers to Boycott Festival. 5.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2003b, September 19. Prasad Says No Censor for Docus. 5.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2004, January 25. Film-makers Protest Fest, Organise Parallel Event. http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=74190
  9. Resisting Censorship: Celebrating Freedom of Expression. 2004. Unpublished Report written and edited by a commission of the Campaign Against Censorship at MIFF.Google Scholar
  10. The Telegraph India. 2004, January 28. Karnad Quit Blow to Film Big Brother. www.telegraphindia.com/1040129/asp/others/print.html
  11. The Times of India. 2003, September 19. Docu-makers Are MIFFed No More. 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Battaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.IRMECCEN, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris 3ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations