Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Streetscape Design and Temporary Appropriation in Latin American Cities: The Case of Mexico City Centre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban and Transit Planning

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

Abstract

A vast amount of literature discusses the physical attributes of a built environment for the purposes of creating lively and inclusive public spaces for the sake of its temporary appropriation by citizens. Here, the term temporary appropriation is defined as the act in which people use public spaces to carry out individual or collective activities other than the purpose for which the space was originally designed. The paper reviews relevant literature and analyses urban design elements of the streetscape that are related to the temporary appropriation. This paper identifies elements supporting temporary appropriation in the context of Mexico City Centre. The main aim of the study is to explore this relationship by assessing the softness of the streetscape and the diversity index of temporary appropriation in Mexico City Centre. The analysis and the study of the selected area may provide insight and contribute to a better understanding of this relationship within heritage city centres in Latin American cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Normalizing data. Encyclopedia of Research Design, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n278.

  • Agencia d’Ecologia Urbana de Barcelona. (2019). BCNecologia. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from http://www.bcnecologia.net/es/sobre-bcnecologia.

  • Alessandri Carlos, A. F. (2014). La ciudad como privación y la reapropiación de lo urbano como ejercicio para la ciudadania. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales, XVIII(493), 1–13. https://doi.org/1138-9788.

  • Anderson, S. (1986a). On streets. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. (1986b). Studies toward and ecological model of the urban environment. On streets (pp. 267–307). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D., Gerson, M. S., & Lintell, M. (1981). Livable streets, protected neighborhoods. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya Diaz, D. F. (2016). Propiedad y apropiación. In Contested cities. Madrid, España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autoridad del Centro Historico. (2011). Plan Integral de Manejo del Centro Historico de la Ciudad de Mexico (2011–2016) (Vol. 9). Mexico, DF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autoridad del Centro Historico. (2014). Reporte 2007-2014. Mexico, DF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, Y. D., Head, G. W., & Awosoga, O. (2012). Housing and aboriginal people in urban centres: A quantitative evaluation. Aboriginal Policy Studies, 2 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environments. London, UK: The Architectural Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolio Arceo, E. (2012). Urban transformations and place-identity: The case of Merida, Mexico. UK: Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. C., & Lombard, J. (2014). Neighborhoods and social interaction. Wellbeing and Environment, 44(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, G., & Monnet, J. (2013). Una retórica progresista para un urbanismo conservador: La protección de los centros históricos en América Latina. In P. Ramirez Kuri (Ed.), Espacio público y reconstruccion de la ciudadanía (pp. 105–136). Mexico, DF: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854695.

  • Carmona, M. (2015). Re-theorising contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(4), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrera Stampa, M. (2002). Tenochtitlan (Ciudad de México), Evolución. 1325–2012. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from http://www.foroamistad.org/otros-temas/tenochtitlan-(ciudad-de-mexico)-evolucion-1325-2012/.

  • Carrion, M. F. (2007a). El financiamiento de la centralidad urbana: el inicio de un debate necesario. Financiamiento de Los Centros Históricos de América Latina y El Caribe, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrion, M. F. (2007b). El financiamiento de los centros históricos de América Latina y el Caribe. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrion, M. F. (2013, October). Dime quién financia el centro histórico y te diré qué centro histórico es. Revista Digital Del Programa En Gestion de La Ciudad, (16), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casakin, H., & Bernardo, F. (2012). In H. Casakin & F. Bernardo (Eds.), The role of place identity in the perception, understanding and design of built environments. Manhattan, US: Bentham Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choay, F. (2001). Historic heritage and the contemporary culture industry. In The invention of the historic monument (pp. 138–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, H. (2008). Urbanismo La representación y apropiación del espacio abierto en el sentido común del sujeto social. Fermentum. Revista Venezolana de Sociología y Antropología. Universidad de Los Andes. Merida, Venezuela, 18(0798–3069), 573–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranz, G. (1982). The politics of park design: A history of urban parks in America. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossa, V. (2009). Resisting the entrepreneurial city: Street vendors’ struggle in Mexico City’s historic center. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00823.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa, V. (2016). Searching for order on the “dirty” streets of the city. Displacement of street vendors in colonial and postcolonial Mexico City. In Contested cities. Madrid, España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (1998). The street in the making of popular geographical knowledge. In Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space (pp. 160–175).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984). In S. Rendall (Ed.), The practice of every day life. Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgadillo, V. (2014). La Política del espacio público y del patrimonio urbano en la Ciudad de México. Discurso progresista, negocios inmobiliarios y buen comportamiento social. In XIII Coloquio Internacional de Geocrítica. Barcelona, España: Universitat de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Parra, R. I. (2014). La transformación del centro histórico de la Ciudad de México. ¿Gentrificación o repoblación? In XII Coloquio y Trabajos de Campo del Grupo de Geografía Urbana (AGE). Territorios inconclusos y sociedades rotas (pp. 1–10). Madrid y Castilla la Mancha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (2004, January). Traffic: Why it’s getting worse, what government can do (Vol. 1, pp. 186–186). The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/traffic-why-its-getting-worse-what-government-can-do/.

  • Ferguson, K. T., Cassells, R. C., MacAllister, J. W., & Evans, G. W. (2013). The physical environment and child development: An international review. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.804190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca Rodriguez, J. M. (2015). La importancia y la apropiación de los espacios públicos en las ciudades. Revista de Tecnologia y Sociedad, 4(7), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (1984). Mapping downtown activity. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1(1), 21–35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43028671.

  • García Espinosa, S. (2005). Centros históricos ¿herencia del pasado o construcción del presente? Agentes detonadores de un nuevo esquema de ciudad. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales, IX(39), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0.

  • Gehmann, U. (2009). Formatting and loss of space—Considerations (including annex typing & loss). Main, 1, 60–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The theory of affordances. In The ecological approach to visual perception (1st ed., pp. 119–136). New York, US: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de la Ciudad de Mexico. (2016). Autoridad del Centro Historico. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.autoridadcentrohistorico.df.gob.mx.

  • Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Ley para el uso de las vías y los espacios públicos del Distrito Federal, Diario Oficial de la Federación §. (2013). Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

  • Google Maps. (2014). Calle 16 de Septiembre. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://www.google.com.mx/maps/@19.4326015,-99.1393943,3a,75y,278.45h,92.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_dBAcn3P-6RcY8byQlYw6Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656.

  • Graumann, C. F. (1976). The concept of appropriation (aneignung) and modes of appropriation of space. Universitat Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://iaps.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?iaps_00_1976_009.

  • Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). New York, US: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez de Velasco Romo, E. G., & Padilla Lozano, F. (2012). Apropiación y uso del espacio público en el centro de la ciudad de Aguascalientes. Investigación y Ciencia, 20(56), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Bonilla, M. (2008). Contested public space development: The case of low income neighbourhoods in Xalapa, Mexico. Landscape Research, 33 (4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802191162.

  • Hernández Bonilla, M., & Gómez Gómez, S. (2015). Conflicto espacial, exclusión y espacio público en la centralidad urbana de Xalapa, Veracruz. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 7(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.007.003.AO04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, R., Borsdorf, A., & San Martin, G. (2014). Socio-spatial change in the world heritage site Valparaíso. Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 144(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-145-20.

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1986). The social logic of space. Landscape and urban planning (Vol. 13). New York, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. B. (1993). Great streets: Monument Avenue, Richmond, Virginia. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities (Vol. 71). https://doi.org/10.2307/794509.

  • Kärrholm, M. (2007). The materiality of territorial production—A conceptual discussion of territoriality, materiality and the everyday life of public space. Space and Culture, 0–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207304356.

  • Keller, A. H. (2006). A road by any other name: Trails, paths, and roads in Maya language and thought. In Landscapes of Movement Symposium (p. 29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment & Behavior, 36(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1976). Appropriation of space. In Proceedings of the Strasbourg Conference. IAPC-3. Strasbourg-Lovaine La Neuve: CIACO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1971). In J. Gonzalez-Pueyo (Ed.), De lo rural a lo urbano. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Peninsula.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1992). The production of the space (1996th ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legeby, A. (2013). Patterns of co-presence spatial configuration and social segregation. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon Portilla, M. (1995). Antologia de Tehotihuacan a los Aztecas. Fuentes e interpretaciones históricas. First re-i. Mexico, DF, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-sideris, A., & Mukhija, V. (2014). Conclusion: Deepening the understanding of informal urbanism. In V. Mukhija & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), The informal American city. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. M. (1999, August). Spatializing culture. Theorizing the City, 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Garcia, T., Preston, R., & Woudstra, R. (2014). Tactical urbanism (Vol. 2). New York, US: Street Plans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Boston, US: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (1996). Urban design and dilemmas of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1068/d140331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdzar, S. S. B. S. (2008). Sociability vs accessibility urban street life. United Kingdom: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V. (2013). The street. A quintessential social public space. New York, US: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. (1995). In Centro de estudios mexicanos y centroamericanos (Ed.), Usos e imágenes del centro histórico de la Ciudad de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. (1996). Espacio público, comercio y urbanidad en Francia, México y Estados Unidos. ALTERIDADES, 6(11), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A. V. (1991). Public streets for public use. New York, US: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2007). Public spaces and democratic politics. LAPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1938). The culture of cities (pp. 405–481). London, UK: Anthony Rowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. J. (1963). Townscapes of Mexico: An example of the regional variation of townscapes. Economic Geography, 39(1), 74–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/142496.

  • Oehmichen, C. (2010). Espacio urbano y segregación étnica en la ciudad de México. Cuadernos de Estudios Sociales Urbanos, (6), 61–75. Retrieved from http://www.cedib.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/villalibre_6.pdf#page=62.

  • Pol Urrútia, E. (2002). El modelo dual de la apropiación del espacio en Mira, R., Sabucedo, JM y Romay, J. Psicología y Medio Ambiente. Aspectos Psicosociales, Educativos y Metodológicos, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, 10(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portal, M. A. (2009). Las creencias en el asfalto. La sacralización como una forma de apropiación del espacio público en la ciudad de México. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, 30, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2017, October). What If we built cities around places? Retrieved from http://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/.

  • Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Kuri, P. (2008). La fragilidad del espacio publico en la ciudad segregada. In R. Cordera, P. Ramirez Kuri, & A. Ziccardi (Eds.), Pobreza, desigualdad y exclusión social en la ciudad del siglo XXI (pp. 1–25). Mexico, DF: Siglo XXI editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Kuri, P. (2010). La ciudad y los nuevos procesos urbanos. Sociología Urbana, 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Kuri, P. (2015). Espacio público, ¿espacio de todos? Reflexiones desde la ciudad de México. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 1(77), 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Kuri, P. (Ed.). (2016). La reinvencion del espacio publico en la ciudad fragmentada. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redacción ADN. (2015). Inversión por 16 MDP en parques públicos y espacios deportivos en Oaxaca: Administración (20:40h) ‹ ADN – Agencia Digital de Noticias Sureste. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from http://adnsureste.info/inversion-por-16-mdp-en-parques-publicos-y-espacios-deportivos-en-oaxaca-administracion-2040-h/.

  • Rivera, D. (1945). La Gran Tenochtitlan. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_Gran_Tenochtitlan.JPG.

  • Salazar Trujillo, J. H. (2010). Uso y apropriación de los espacios públicos. Medellin, Colombia: Impregón S.A. Medellín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansot, P. (1976). Notes sur le concept d’appropriation. In Conférence Internationale de Psychologie de l’Espace Construit (3rd IAPS) de Strasbourg (pp. 67–75). Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraví, G. A. (2008). Mundos Aislados: Segregación Urbana y Desigualdad en la Ciudad de México. EURE (Santiago), 34(103), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612008000300005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequera, J. (2014). Ciudad, espacio público y gubernamentalidad neoliberal. Urban, 07, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanislawski, D. (1947). Early Spanish town planning in the new world. American Geographical Society, 37(1), 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez Pareyón, A. (2004, August). El centro histórico de la Ciudad de México al inicio del siglo XXI. Revista Invi, 19(51), 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, E. (2009) Apropiación Versus Usos Del Espacio Público. https://www.mardelplata.gob.ar/documentos/policia/taller 1 cultura y territorio apuntes.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2017.

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia. Study of environmental perception, attitudes and values (1st ed.). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ujang, N. (2012). Place attachment and continuity of urban place identity. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2013). World heritage list. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/.

  • UNESCO. (2015, July). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal Moranta, T., & Pol Urrútia, E. (2005). La apropiación del espacio: Una propuesta teórica para comprender la vinculación entre las personas y los lugares. Anuario de Psicologia, 36(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D., & Sanders, W. (2001). La antigua ciudad mesoamericana: teoría y concepto. In Urbanismo en las sociedades antiguas (pp. 43–64). http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2776058.

  • Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Common Ground. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124168201000411.

  • Yory, M. C. (2011). El Concepto de Topofilia entendido como Teoría del Lugar. Revista Barrio Taller, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    J. A. Lara-Hernandez, Alessandro Melis & Silvio Caputo

Authors
  1. J. A. Lara-Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro Melis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvio Caputo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Lara-Hernandez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University for the Creative Arts, Canterbury, UK

    Hocine Bougdah

  2. Universita degli Studi di Enna “Kore” – Cittadella Universitaria, Enna, Italy

    Antonella Versaci

  3. Technische Universität Luleå, Luleå, Norrbottens Län, Sweden

    Adolf Sotoca

  4. Department of Architecture, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    Ferdinando Trapani

  5. Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    Marco Migliore

  6. School of Architecture, UF College of Design, Construction & Planning, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Nancy Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lara-Hernandez, J.A., Melis, A., Caputo, S. (2020). Understanding Streetscape Design and Temporary Appropriation in Latin American Cities: The Case of Mexico City Centre. In: Bougdah, H., Versaci, A., Sotoca, A., Trapani, F., Migliore, M., Clark, N. (eds) Urban and Transit Planning. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation