Skip to main content

Opportunities and Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Bioengineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 907 Accesses

Part of the book series: Computational Biology ((COBO,volume 30))

Abstract

Our capability to engineer biological systems is increasing rapidly in both speed and scale, leading to explosive growth in the complexity of bioengineering projects that can be contemplated. Artificial intelligence techniques have helped to tame such complexity in many other fields, and are beginning to be employed in the same way to the engineering of biological organisms. Using these techniques, computers represent, acquire, and employ domain knowledge to automate “more routine” processes and allow humans to instead focus more on deeper issues of science and engineering. At the same time, applying more sophisticated techniques such as these imposes new demands on biological systems experimentation, particularly with respect to representation and curation of data. This chapter surveys the current state of the art in applying artificial intelligence to bioengineering, as well as discussing opportunities and challenges for the future.

This document does not contain technology or technical data controlled under either U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulation or U.S. Export Administration Regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bartley B, Beal J, Gruenberg R, McLaughlin J, Myers C, Roehner N, Wipat A (2018) SEP 019–using SBOL to model the design-build-test-learn cycle. https://github.com/SynBioDex/SEPs/blob/master/sep_019.md

  2. Basu S, Gerchman Y, Collins CH, Arnold FH, Weiss R (2005) A synthetic multicellular systems for programmed pattern formation. Nature 434:1130–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beal J, Bachrach J (2008) Cells are plausible targets for high-level spatial languages. In: Proceedings of the 2008 second IEEE international conference on self-adaptive and self-organizing systems workshops, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, SASOW ’08, pp 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2008.14

  4. Beal J, Yaman F (2012) Toward automated design of cell state detectors. In: 4th international workshop on bio-design automation

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beal J, Lu T, Weiss R (2011) Automatic compilation from high-level biologically-oriented programming language to genetic regulatory networks. PLoS One 6(8):e22,490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beal J, Weiss R, Densmore D, Adler A, Appleton E, Babb J, Bhatia S, Davidsohn N, Haddock T, Loyall J et al (2012) An end-to-end workflow for engineering of biological networks from high-level specifications. ACS Synth Biol 1(8):317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beal J, Wagner TE, Kitada T, Azizgolshani O, Parker JM, Densmore D, Weiss R (2014) Model-driven engineering of gene expression from RNA replicons. ACS Synth Biol

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beal J, Adler A, Yaman F (2016) Managing bioengineering complexity with AI techniques. Biosystems 148:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beal J, DeLateur N, Teague B, Weiss R, Sexton J, Castillo-Hair S, Tabor JJ (2017) Toward quantitative comparison of fluorescent protein expression levels via fluorescent beads. In: International workshop on bio-design automation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beal J, Haddock-Angelli T, Baldwin G, Gershater M, Dwijayanti A, Storch M, de Mora K, Lizarazo M, Rettberg R et al (2018) Quantification of bacterial fluorescence using independent calibrants. PLoS one 13(6):e0199,432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berkeley Software 2009 iGem Team (2009) Eugene. http://2009.igem.org/Team:Berkeley_Software/Eugene

  12. Bonnet J, Yin P, Ortiz ME, Subsoontorn P, Endy D (2013) Amplifying genetic logic gates. Science 340(6132):599–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borujeni AE, Channarasappa AS, Salis HM (2013) Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites. Nucleic Acids Res p gkt1139

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bryce D, Goldman R, Kuter U, Beal J, DeHaven M, Geib CS, Plotnick A, Nguyen T, Roehner N (2018) Domain agnostic experimental planning for synthetic biology. In: Hierarchical planning workshop

    Google Scholar 

  15. Canton B, Labno A, Endy D (2008) Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nature Biotechnol 26:787–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen B, Cahoon D, Canton B, Che A (2015) Software for engineering biology in a multi-purpose foundry. In: International workshop on bio-design automation

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen J, Goyal G, Plahar HA, Keasling JD, Stawski N, Hillson NJ (2014) DIVA: More science, less DNA construction. In: International workshop on bio-design automation

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cox RS, Madsen C, McLaughlin J, Nguyen T, Roehner N, Bartley B, Bhatia S, Bissell M, Clancy K, Gorochowski T, et al (2018a) Synthetic biology open language visual (SBOL visual) version 2.0. J Integr Bioinformat 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cox RS, Madsen C, McLaughlin JA, Nguyen T, Roehner N, Bartley B, Beal J, Bissell M, Choi K, Clancy K, et al (2018b) Synthetic biology open language (SBOL) version 2.2.0. J Integr Bioinformat 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Czar M, Cai Y, Peccoud J (2009) Writing DNA with GenoCAD. Nucleic Acids Res 37(W40–7)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davidsohn N, Beal J, Kiani S, Adler A, Yaman F, Li Y, Xie Z, Weiss R (2014) Accurate predictions of genetic circuit behavior from part characterization and modular composition. ACS Synth Biol

    Google Scholar 

  22. Degtyarenko K, de Matos P, Ennis M, Hastings J, Zbinden M, McNaught A, Alcántara R, Darsow M, Guedj M, Ashburner M (2008) ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D344–D350 http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/suppl_1/D344.short

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Demir E, Cary MP, Paley S, Fukuda K, Lemer C, Vastrik I, Wu G, D’eustachio P, Schaefer C, Luciano J, et al (2010) The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing. Nat Biotechnol 28(9):935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Densmore D, Hsiau THC, Kittleson JT, DeLoache W, Batten C, Anderson JC (2010) Algorithms for automated DNA assembly. Nucleic Acids Res 38(8):2607–2616. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eilbeck K, Lewis SE, Mungall CJ, Yandell M, Stein L, Durbin R, Ashburner M (2005) The sequence ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations. Genome Biol 6(5):R44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403:335–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Esvelt KM, Carlson JC, Liu DR (2011) A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature 472(7344):499–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Finney A, Hucka M, Bornstein BJ, Keating SM, Shapiro BM, Matthews J, Kovitz BK, Schilstra MJ, Funahashi A, Doyle J, Kitano H (2006) Software infrastructure for effective communication and reuse of computational models. In: Szallasi Z, Stelling J, Periwal V (eds) System Modeling in cell biology: from concepts to nuts and bolts, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. Galdzicki M, Wilson ML, Rodriguez CA, Pocock MR, Oberortner E, Adam L, Adler A, Anderson JC, Beal J, Chandran D, Densmore D, Drory OA, Endy D, Gennari JH, Grunberg R, Ham TS, Hillson NJ, Johnson JD, Kuchinsky A, Lux MW, Madsen C, Misirli G, Myers CJ, Peccoud J, Plahar H, Platt D, Roehner N, Sirin E, Smith TF, Stan GB, Villalobos A, Wipat A, Sauro HM (2012) Synthetic biology open language (SBOL) Version 1.1.0. RFC 87. arXiv:1721.1/66172

  30. Galdzicki M, Clancy KP, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Quinn JY, Rodriguez CA, Roehner N, Wilson ML, Adam L, Anderson JC et al (2014) The synthetic biology open language (SBOL) provides a community standard for communicating designs in synthetic biology. Nat Biotechnol 32(6):545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gander MW, Vrana JD, Voje WE, Carothers JM, Klavins E (2017) Digital logic circuits in yeast with CRISPR-dCas9 NOR gates. Nat Commun 8(15):459. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC 3rd, CAH, Smith HO (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6(5):343–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ham TS, Dmytriv Z, Plahar H, Chen J, Hillson NJ, Keasling JD (2012) Design, implementation and practice of JBEI-ICE: an open source biological part registry platform and tools. Nucleic Acids Res 40(18):e141–e141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA (2000) DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hillson NJ, Rosengarten R, Keasling JD (2012) j5 DNA assembly design automation software. ACS Synth Biol 1(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoffman RA, Wang L, Bigos M, Nolan JP (2012) NIST/ISAC standardization study: variability in assignment of intensity values to fluorescence standard beads and in cross calibration of standard beads to hard dyed beads. Cytom Part A 81(9):785–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ison J, Kalaš M, Jonassen I, Bolser D, Uludag M, McWilliam H, Malone J, Lopez R, Pettifer S, Rice P (2013) Edam: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats. Bioinformatics 29(10):1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) Kegg: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelly JR, Rubin AJ, Davis JH, Ajo-Franklin CM, Cumbers J, Czar MJ, de Mora K, Glieberman AL, Monie DD, Endy D (2009) Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard. J Biol Eng 3(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kiani S, Beal J, Ebrahimkhani MR, Huh J, Hall RN, Xie Z, Li Y, Weiss R (2014a) CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 11(7):723–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kiani S, Beal J, Ebrahimkhani MR, Huh J, Hall RN, Xie Z, Li Y, Weiss R (2014b) CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells. Nat Methods

    Google Scholar 

  42. King RD, Rowland J, Oliver SG, Pir P, Aubrey W, Liakata M, Markham M, Soldatova LN, Whelan KE, Clare A et al (2009) The robot scientist Adam. Computer 42(8):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Klavins E (2018) Aquarium. http://klavinslab.org/aquarium

  44. Knight T (2003) Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of BioBricks. Technical Reports, MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group Technical Reports

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Lakhani KR, Von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: free user-to-user assistance. Res Policy 32(6):923–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Le Novere N, Hucka M, Mi H, Moodie S, Schreiber F, Sorokin A, Demir E, Wegner K, Aladjem MI, Wimalaratne SM et al (2009) The systems biology graphical notation. Nat Biotechnol 27(8):735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lebo T, Sahoo S, McGuinness D, Belhajjame K, Cheney J, Corsar D, Garijo D, Soiland-Reyes S, Zednik S, Zhao J (2013) PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C recommendation, 30 April 2013. World Wide Web Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li Y, Jiang Y, Chen H, Liao W, Li Z, Weiss R, Xie Z (2015) Modular construction of mammalian gene circuits using tale transcriptional repressors. Nat Chem Biol 11(3):207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Linshiz G, Stawski N, Poust S, Bi C, Keasling JD, Hillson NJ (2012) PaR-PaR laboratory automation platform. ACS Synth Biol 2(5):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lou C, Stanton B, Chen YJ, Munsky B, Voigt CA (2012) Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context. Nat Biotechnol 30(11):1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Madsen C, McLaughlin JA, Mısırlı G, Pocock M, Flanagan K, Hallinan J, Wipat A (2016) The SBOL Stack: A Platform for Storing, Publishing, and Sharing Synthetic Biology Designs. ACS Synth Biol 5(6):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00210, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Marchisio MA, Stelling J (2011) Automatic design of digital synthetic gene circuits. PLoS Comput Biol 7(2):e1001–083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McLaughlin JA, Myers CJ, Zundel Z, Misirli G, Zhang M, Ofiteru ID, Goñi Moreno A, Wipat A (2018) SynBioHub: a standards-enabled design repository for synthetic biology. ACS Synth Biol

    Google Scholar 

  54. Morrell WC, Birkel GW, Forrer M, Lopez T, Backman TW, Dussault M, Petzold CJ, Baidoo EE, Costello Z, Ando D et al (2017) The experiment data depot: a web-based software tool for biological experimental data storage, sharing, and visualization. ACS Synth Biol 6(12):2248–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mutalik VK, Guimaraes JC, Cambray G, Lam C, Christoffersen MJ, Mai QA, Tran AB, Paull M, Keasling JD, Arkin AP et al (2013) Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nat Methods 10(4):354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nielsen AA, Der BS, Shin J, Vaidyanathan P, Paralanov V, Strychalski EA, Ross D, Densmore D, Voigt CA (2016) Genetic circuit design automation. Science 352(6281):aac7341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ostrov N, Landon M, Guell M, Kuznetsov G, Teramoto J, Cervantes N, Zhou M, Singh K, Napolitano MG, Moosburner M et al (2016) Design, synthesis, and testing toward a 57-codon genome. Science 353(6301):819–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pedersen M, Phillips A (2009) Towards programming languages for genetic engineering of living cells. J Royal Soc Interf Royal Soc 6(4):S437–S450. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19369220

  59. Quinn JY, Cox RS III, Adler A, Beal J, Bhatia S, Cai Y, Chen J, Clancy K, Galdzicki M, Hillson NJ et al (2015) SBOL visual: a graphical language for genetic designs. PLoS Biol 13(12):e1002,310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Richardson SM, Mitchell LA, Stracquadanio G, Yang K, Dymond JS, DiCarlo JE, Lee D, Huang CLV, Chandrasegaran S, Cai Y et al (2017) Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 355(6329):1040–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rocklin G, Chidyausiku T, Goreshnik I, Ford A, Houliston S, Lemak A, Carter L, Ravichandran R, Mulligan V, Chevalier A, Arrowsmith C, Baker D (2017) Global analysis of protein folding using massively parallel design, synthesis, and testing. Science 357:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0693

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Roehner N, Beal J, Clancy K, Bartley B, Misirli G, Grünberg R, Oberortner E, Pocock M, Bissell M, Madsen C et al (2016) Sharing structure and function in biological design with SBOL 2.0. ACS Synth Biol 5(6):498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Salis HM, Mirsky EA, Voigt CA (2009) Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat Biotechnol 27(10):946–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Simons KT, Strauss C, Baker D (2001) Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J Molecul Biol 306(5):1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Smanski MJ, Bhatia S, Zhao D, Park Y, Woodruff LB, Giannoukos G, Ciulla D, Busby M, Calderon J, Nicol R et al (2014) Functional optimization of gene clusters by combinatorial design and assembly. Nat Biotechnol 32(12):1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Solé R, Amor DR, Duran-Nebreda S, Conde-Pueyo N, Carbonell-Ballestero M, Montañez R (2016) Synthetic collective intelligence. Biosystems 148:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Stanton B, Nielsen A, Tamsir A, Clancy K, Peterson T, Voigt C (2014) Genomic mining of prokaryotic repressors for orthogonal logic gates. Nat Chem Biol 10(2):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Synthace (2018) Antha programming language. https://www.antha-lang.org

  70. Transcriptic (2018) Autoprotocol. http://autoprotocol.org/

  71. UniProt Consortium (2014) UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43(D1):D204–D212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vasilev V, Liu C, Haddock T, Bhatia S, Adler A, Yaman F, Beal J, Babb J, Weiss R, Densmore D (2011) A software stack for specification and robotic execution of protocols for synthetic biological engineering. In: 3rd international workshop on bio-design automation

    Google Scholar 

  73. Waltemath D, Adams R, Bergmann FT, Hucka M, Kolpakov F, Miller AK, Moraru II, Nickerson D, Sahle S, Snoep JL et al (2011) Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML-the simulation experiment description markup language. BMC Syst Biol 5(1):198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang C, Bradley P, Baker D (2007) Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 373(2):503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Weber E, Engler C, Gruetzner R, Werner S, Marillonnet S (2011) A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PLoS One 6(2):e16,765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Weinberg BH, Pham NTH, Caraballo LD, Lozanoski T, Engel A, Bhatia S, Wong WW (2017) Large-scale design of robust genetic circuits with multiple inputs and outputs for mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 35(5):453–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&d Manag 36(3):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Xiang Z, Mungall C, Ruttenberg A, He Y (2011) Ontobee: A linked data server and browser for ontology terms. In: ICBO

    Google Scholar 

  79. Xie Z, Wroblewska L, Prochazka L, Weiss R, Benenson Y (2011) Multi-input RNAi-based logic circuit for identification of specific cancer cells. Science 333(6047):1307–1311. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Yaman F, Bhatia S, Adler A, Densmore D, Beal J (2012) Automated selection of synthetic biology parts for genetic regulatory networks. ACS Synth Biol 1(8):332–344. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300032y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Beal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yaman, F., Adler, A., Beal, J. (2019). Opportunities and Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Bioengineering. In: Liò, P., Zuliani, P. (eds) Automated Reasoning for Systems Biology and Medicine. Computational Biology, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17297-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17297-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17296-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17297-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics