Skip to main content

Show Me Your Moves: Analyzing Body Signals to Predict Creativity of Knowledge Workers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Innovation Networks

Abstract

We propose a novel approach to measuring the collaboration of knowledge workers, using body sensing smartwatches to capture psychometric data about individuals in a team. In a proof of concept study, we collected 2653 samples of body signals by equipping 15 people with our body sensing smartwatch over the course of 3 days during a design workshop. Additionally, we polled the users about their self-perceived team creativity at the end of each day. By employing multiple linear regression models, we found that body signals tracked by the smartwatch correlate significantly with the perceived team creativity reported by the individuals. Comparing those correlations with known predictors of creativity such as mood states and personality traits, we found that movement-related body signals predict creativity on the same accuracy level as mood states and personality traits do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Happimeter smartphone and watch code is open source and free for academic use. More information can be found at https://happimeter.org

  2. 2.

    Unfortunately, the pebble 2 smartwatch has been discontinued and is not produced anymore. The Happimeter was migrated to a generic Android platform. More information can be found at https://happimeter.org

References

  • Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adaman, J. E., & Blaney, P. H. (1995). The effects of musical mood induction on creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 29, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Van Alstyne, M. (2012). Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Information Systems Research, 23, 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., et al. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, R., Lombardo, C. T., & Wax, T. (2015). Design sprint: A practical guidebook for building great digital products. Newton, MA: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., & Lumsden, J. (1980). Test length and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., Nakazato, H., & Shiraishi, D. (1975). Universality and distinctiveness in dimensions of Japanese person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M. T., Green, B. C., Hemme, F., & Chalip, L. (2014). Assessing the relationship between youth sport participation settings and creativity in adulthood. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budner, P., Eirich, J., & Gloor, P. A. (2017). “Making you happy makes me happy” - measuring individual mood with smartwatches. ArXiv171106134 Cs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, M. M. (2001). The effects of affect manipulation and information exposure on divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait–multimethod–multioccasion analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa FL Psychol. Assess. Resour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggett, M., O’Brien, K., Hurley, M., & Hannon, D. (2017). Predicting team performance through human behavioral sensing and quantitative workflow instrumentation. In Advances in human factors and system interactions (pp. 245–258). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, J., Jenkins, J., Meservy, T., Steffen, J., & Payne, K. (2017). Using wearable devices for non-invasive, inexpensive physiological data collection. In Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2017 HICSS-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. (2013). Handbook of creativity. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göritz, A. S., & Moser, K. (2003). Mood and flexibility in categorization: A conceptual replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford happiness questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational-behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jausovec, N., & Bakracevic, K. (1995). What can heart rate tell us about the creative process? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léger, P.-M., Davis, F. D., Cronan, T. P., & Perret, J. (2014). Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive absorption in an enactive training context. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Worcester, MA: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., Kedem, P., & Paz, D. (1990). Anxiety and categorization—1. The structure and boundaries of mental categories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnery, B. S., & Fine, M. S. (2009). FEATURE neuroscience and the future of human-computer interaction. Interactions, 16, 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, A. (2010). Honest signals: How they shape our world. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., Roberts, B. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockham, N. (2016). Opening the black box: Publishing Pebble’s activity-tracking algorithms. Medium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37, 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SuzanneK. Vosburg, G. K. (1997). ‘Paradoxical’ mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition & Emotion, 11, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, J. F., Ahs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaeghen, P., Joorman, J., & Khan, R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: The relation between self-reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5, 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosburg, S. K. (1998). The effects of positive and negative mood on divergent-thinking performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., Kim, J., & André, E. (2005). From physiological signals to emotions: Implementing and comparing selected methods for feature extraction and classification. In IEEE international conference on Multimedia and expo, 2005, ICME 2005 (pp. 940–943). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (1963). Relationships between creative thinking abilities of teachers and achievement and adjustment of pupils. The Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stein, M., Gloor, P.A., Oster, D. (2019). Show Me Your Moves: Analyzing Body Signals to Predict Creativity of Knowledge Workers. In: Song, Y., Grippa, F., Gloor, P.A., Leitão, J. (eds) Collaborative Innovation Networks. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17238-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics