Skip to main content

Beyond Barbour: A Theology of Science from Ancient and Modern Thinkers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 510 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education ((CTISE,volume 48))

Abstract

In this chapter, I will challenge a common background relational assumption behind all of Barbour’s categories as intrinsically unfaithful to the universal nature of both science and religion, arguing instead that it is more fruitful to ask what a ‘theology of science’ might look like. ‘What does science do, and what is it for, within a theological worldview?’ This approach works very well in a teaching context when developed in two ways: (1) historically and (2) using Biblical studies in wisdom, especially in the book of Job. Students of this approach start to think in new ways and ask new questions, suggesting an approach to science or in its more ancient form natural philosophy – the ‘love of wisdom of natural things’ – that can draw on theological and cultural roots. I suggest that deriving a human narrative for science in this way can transform the way political discussions of ‘troubled technologies’ (genetic medicine, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), fracking, etc.) are framed and the way we approach science in education and the media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We will not be considering the second of these in the current chapter, but it encompasses the anthropology and neuroscience of religion, for two examples.

  2. 2.

    We take quotations of the text from the magisterial new translation and commentary by Clines (2014).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Rome, Bibl. Vat., MS Chigi A.VIII. 245, f. 16va

  4. 4.

    Robert Grosseteste Commentary on the Posterior Analytics, quoted in R.W. Southern (1992) Robert Grosseteste; the growth of an English mind in medieval Europe, Oxford: Clarendon Press p167

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition (p. 314). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis (1887). In Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., & Heath, D. D. (Eds.), Works. Volume III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begbie, J. (2000). Theology, music and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. H. (2010). The seven pillars of creation. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clines, David (2014). World bible commentaries: Job. Thomas Nelson pubs., Nelson, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J., & Hocknull, M. (Eds.). (2016). Grosseteste and the pursuit of religious and scientific learning in the middle ages. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., Macnaghten, P., & Kearnes, M. (Eds.). (2009). Chapter 12: Reconfiguring responsibility: Deepening debate on nanotechnology. Durham: University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.-P. (2010). The Narratology of lay ethics. NanoEthics, 4, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004) Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy (Catherine Porter, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (2008) “It’s development, stupid!” or: How to modernize modernization. In Jim Procter (Ed.), Postenvironmentalism. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, T. (2014). Faith and wisdom in science. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, T. C. B. (2015). The search for affirming narratives for the future governance of technology: reflections from a science-theology perspective on GMFuturos. In P. Macnaghten & S. Carro-Ripalda (Eds.), Governing agricultural sustainability. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern, R. W. (1992). Robert Grosseteste; the growth of an English mind in medieval Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1989). Real presences. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, N. (1997). Art in action; Toward a Christian aesthetic. Grand Rapids: Wm, B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McLeish, T.C.B. (2019). Beyond Barbour: A Theology of Science from Ancient and Modern Thinkers. In: Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (eds) Science and Religion in Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17233-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17234-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics