Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education ((CTISE,volume 48))

Abstract

Questions which bridge science and religion cross many boundaries, and this is especially the case in schools and other educational institutions. The boundaries that a curriculum puts around different types of knowledge and different ways of constructing knowledge work well in so many ways in education, but they can become barriers to asking and exploring questions that bridge science and religion if they become systematic and entrenched. At the heart of this book and this introductory chapter, there is a belief that a model of the relationship between science and religion that presumes conflict to be the only way in which they can be viewed does neither science nor religion justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkins, P. (2011). On being: A scientist’s exploration of the great questions of existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B. & Abedin, M. (2016). Primary children’s perspectives on questions that bridge science and religion: Findings from a survey study in England. Paper presented at the BERA (British Education Research Association) annual conference, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B., Taber, K., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2012). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion; a preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9317-y.

  • Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B., Borgeaud, J. & Knapp, Z. (2016). Teaching science and religion: Student teacher perceptions. Paper presented at the Values and Education, Winchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B., Nassji, M., Fraser, S., & Lawson, F. (2018). A framework for epistemic insight. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9788-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. P. (2018). Religion vs. science: What religious people really think. York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E. H., Johnson, D. R., Vaidyanathan, B., Kirstin, R. W., Matthews, K. R. W., Lewis, S. W., Thomson, R. A., Jr., & Di, D. (2019). Secularity and science: What scientists around the world really think about religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, O. (1982). The Galileo affair. Scientific American, 247(August), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, J., Numbers, R. L., & Binzley, R. A. (Eds.). (2018). The warfare between science and religion: The idea that wouldn’t die. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos MORI (2011). Views on globalisation and faith. See https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/migrations/en-uk/files/Assets/Docs/News/ipsos-globaladvisor-views-on-globalisation-and-faith.pdf.

  • Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2016). Insights into the diversity of attitudes concerning evolution andc creation: A multidimensional approach. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21226.

  • McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujtaba, T., Reiss, M. J., & Stones, A. (2017). Epistemic insight: Teaching about science and RE in secondary schools. School Science Review, 99(367), 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newall, E. (2017). Evolution, insight and truth? School Science Review, 99(367), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. (2007). User’s guide to science and belief: Questions of faith. Oxford: Lion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2013). Religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 317–328). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2014). What significance does Christianity have for science education? In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Handbook of historical and philosophical research in science education (pp. 1637–1662). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful: The evolution of attraction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. (1999). The creation/evolution continuum. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M. (2007). Practical mystic: Religion, science, and A. S. Eddington. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M. (2015). Huxley’s church and Maxwell’s demon: From theistic science to naturalistic science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, T., & Teece, G. (2010). Teaching religion and science: Effective pedagogy and practical approaches for RE teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Hart, J., & Martens, J. P. (2011). Death and science: The existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS One, 6(3), e17349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R., & Briggs, A. (2016). The penultimate curiosity: How science swims in the slipstream of ultimate questions. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (2008). The big questions in science and religion. In West Conshohocken. Pennsylvania: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berry Billingsley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (2019). Introduction. In: Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (eds) Science and Religion in Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17233-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17234-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics