Abstract
The da Vinci Surgical System is intimately associated with the concept of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Its development, which started 25 years ago for military and astronautic purposes, has followed and answered the main challenges of laparoscopic telemanipulation. The innovative enhancement of surgeons’ dexterity, visual capacities, and ergonomics has established the da Vinci system as the gold standard and, until recently, only laparoscopic robotic system. Simulation, virtual mentoring, advanced instrumentation, and enhanced reality are few of the multiple technological adjuncts to the system over the years. Many controversies have been raised, mostly regarding costs and operative time, which are still subject to debate. With the constant improvement of the da Vinci system and the venue of new competitors on the market, robotic laparoscopic surgery will undoubtedly transform the surgical practice at a larger scale in the near future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
NASDAQ_ISRG_2018.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 07]. Available from: http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/NASDAQ_ISRG_2018.pdf
Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1389–402.
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Smith M, Vix M, Simone M, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):487–92.
Faust RA. Robotics in surgery: history, current and future applications, vol. 336. New York: Nova Publishers; 2007.
Intuitive Surgical – Company history [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 29]. Available from: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/about-us/company
Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1091.
Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology. 2001;58(6):893–8.
Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1708–13.
Hagen ME, Stein H, Curet MJ. Introduction to the robotic system. In: Kim KC, editor. Robotics in general surgery [Internet]. New York: Springer New York; 2014. p. 9–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8739-5_2
Intuitive Surgical – da Vinci Surgical Systems [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 07]. Available from: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci/systems
Wilson TG. Advancement of technology and its impact on urologists: release of the daVinci Xi, a new surgical robot. Eur Urol. 2014;66(5):793–4.
Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator: technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(4):396–406.
Kwartowitz DM, Herrell SD, Galloway RL. Toward image-guided robotic surgery: determining intrinsic accuracy of the da Vinci robot. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2006;1(3):157–65.
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2004 May [cited 2017 May 19];18(5). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2
Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Lee JY. The da Vinci ® surgical system overcomes innate hand dominance. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1385–8.
2000-07-Mintz-Falk-Salisbury-Visualization-telesurg-performance.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 07]. Available from: http://ai.stanford.edu/~jks/pubs/2000-07-Mintz-Falk-Salisbury-Visualization-telesurg-performance.pdf
Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg. 2007;193(4):519–22.
Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, Lagares-Garcia JA. The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1695–702.
Leven J, Burschka D, Kumar R, Zhang G, Blumenkranz S, Dai X (Donald), et al. DaVinci Canvas: a telerobotic surgical system with integrated, robot-assisted, laparoscopic ultrasound capability. In: Duncan JS, Gerig G, editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2005 [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005 [cited 2017 May 19]. p. 811–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/11566465_100
Ukimura O, Aron M, Nakamoto M, Shoji S, Abreu AL de C, Matsugasumi T, et al. Three-dimensional surgical navigation model with TilePro display during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28(6):625–30.
Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR. Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(4):635–9.
Lawson EH, Curet MJ, Sanchez BR, Schuster R, Berguer R. Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project. J Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):61–7.
Morelli L, Palmeri M, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Moglia A, Ferrari V, et al. Use of a new integrated table motion for the da Vinci Xi in colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(9):1671–3.
Smith AL, Scott EM, Krivak TC, Olawaiye AB, Chu T, Richard SD. Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm. J Robot Surg. 2013;7(2):113–8.
Kneebone RL. Practice, rehearsal, and performance: an approach for simulation-based surgical and procedure training. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1336.
Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, et al. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology. 2013;81(4):767–74.
Smith R, Truong M, Perez M. Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):972–83.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 510 k act, da Vinci® SpTM Surgical System. K131962 [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 07]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf13/K131962.pdf
ANZCTR – Trial registration – First human use of an investigational bronchoscope system [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 07]. Available from: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371300&isReview=true
Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.
Hagen ME, Jung MK, Fakhro J, Buchs NC, Buehler L, Mendoza JM, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic stapling during robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a case-matched analysis of costs and clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;32(1):472–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douissard, J., Hagen, M.E., Morel, P. (2019). The da Vinci Surgical System. In: Domene, C., Kim, K., Vilallonga Puy, R., Volpe, P. (eds) Bariatric Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17223-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17223-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17222-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17223-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)