Abstract
Testing the reproducibility of an experiment is considered a good practice in science, and the possibility to reproduce an experiment is a condition of its scientificity. We investigate the ability of children to consider a counterintuitive phenomenon as reproducible. The study involved 62 5-year-old children from 4 classes. They were presented with a bottle in which a hole had been pierced and asked if it was possible to stop the water from flowing through the hole without closing it. They were then shown that this result can be obtained by screwing the bottle’s cap. This experiment is counterintuitive enough to be used by some illusionists as a magic trick. It was explained to them that it happens because, since no air can enter the bottle, therefore no water can leave it. Individual interviews were realized by the children’s own teachers. The questionnaire involved questions about their understanding of the notion of reproducibility and the importance of testing reproducibility both by the child himself and by others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bacon, R. (1267). Opus Majus.
Blanquet, E. (2014). La Construction de critères de scientificité pour la démarche d’investigation: une approche pragmatique pour l’enseignement de la physique à l’école primaire, PhD Thesis, Université de Genève, no. FPSE 591 [in French]. http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:42783. Accessed 7 May 2019.
Blanquet, E., & Picholle, E. (2015). Two attainable skills in Kindergarten: Testing reproducibility and robustness in an experiment. Proceedings of the ESERA conference, August 31 – September 4, Helsinki, Finlande.
Charpak, G., & Broch, H. (2003). Devenez sorciers, devenez savants. Paris: Odile Jacob. [in French]
CNRS. (2014). Promouvoir une recherche intègre et responsable. Un guide. Comité d’éthique du CNRS [in French] http://www.cnrs.fr/comets/IMG/pdf/guide_promouvoir_une_recherche_inte_gre_et_responsable_8septembre2014.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018.
IFE. (2011). Démarche d’investigation dans l’enseignement secondaire: représentations des enseignants de mathématiques, SPC, SVT et technologie [in French]. ENS Lyon: Lyon. http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/ife/ressources-et-services/ocep/dispositifs/DI/rapport-DI/. Accessed 31 May 2018.
Journal Officiel. (2015). Programme d’enseignement du cycle des approfondissements (cycle 4) arrêté du 9-11-2015 – J.O. du 24-11-2015 (NOR MENE1526483A) [in French]. http://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/48/02/4/2015_collegeprogramme_28-7_614024.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018.
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125.
McNutt. (2014). Reproducibility (Editorial). Science, 343, 229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250475.
Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170709.
Metz, K. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3.
Nature. (2016). Reality check on reproducibility. Editorial Nature, 533, 437. https://doi.org/10.1038/533437a.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Novellaux, S. (Writer). (2012, December 21). Speciale fin du monde [Television series episode]. In In On n’est pas que des pigeons. Bruxelles: RTBF.
Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.102.
Varelas, M. (1997). Third and fourth graders’ conceptions of repeated trials and best representatives in science experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9<853::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-T.
Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2017). Making replication mainstream. Behavorial and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blanquet, E., Picholle, E. (2019). Science or Magic? Reactions of 5-Year-Old Pupils to a Counterintuitive Experiment. In: McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds) Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17218-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17219-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)