Skip to main content

Teachers’ Training in Developing Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Teaching Modules in the Context of a Community of Learners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 6))

Abstract

This study focuses on teachers’ training in introducing nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) topics in school. In the context of a Community of Learners (CoL) in-service teachers, in collaboration with science education researchers, nanoscience researchers and experts from science museums, developed a teaching module in NST topics which integrates socio-scientific issues and the development of exhibits. The aim of this study is to investigate teachers’ professional change by focusing on their collegial interactions in the CoL. Video recordings and semi-constructed interviews were used for data collection. The Interconnected Model of Professional Growth (IMPG) was used for data analysis in order to unearth the processes that develop the sequences of teachers’ professional change in this context. The findings in this study highlight that teachers’ interactions in the CoL change dynamically, as they anticipate to acquire qualified feedback on the emerged challenges of the task. They interact with researchers and experts, so as to bring in balance science-oriented issues with students’ perspectives and research-based instructional approaches, primarily in the process of analyzing and clarifying aspects of the module which are innovative to them. During the process of the module’s detailed development and implementation, they anticipate feedback primarily from peer teachers, as they seek to swap ideas and to experience practical alternatives from colleagues that share the same interests, concerns and the expertise of the classroom context. The abovementioned interactions supply opportunities for teachers’ professional learning, as they develop processes which impact on their knowledge and their teaching practice, in terms of the IMPG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. D., & Helms, J. V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: The role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. (2016). Nanoscale Informal Science Education in the U.S.—NISE Net. In K. Winkelmann & B. Bhushan (Eds.), Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education (pp. 277–311). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31833-2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blonder, R., Parchmann, I., Akaygün, S., & Albe, V. (2014). Nanoeducation: Zooming into teacher professional development programmes in nanoscience and technology. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education. 9th ESERA conference selected contributions (pp. 159–174). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blonder, R., Zemler, E., & Rosenfeld, S. (2016). The story of lead: A context for learning about Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00177G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L., Magana, A., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Vanscotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness and applications. Colorado Springs: BSCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (1994). Reconceptualising teacher change. In G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, & J. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in mathematics education: Constraints on construction, Vol. 1: Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 153–164). Lismore: Southern Cross University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Pieters, J. (2010). The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers’ professional growth: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Acquisto, L., & Scatena, M. (2006). K-12 Curators: What kids learn by designing exhibitions. Exhibitionist, 25(2), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vocht, M., Laherto, A., & Parchmann, I. (2017). Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing responsible research and innovation to European science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(4), 326–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction–A framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation.http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf. Accessed 24-01-2015.

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamza, K., Piqueras, J., Wickman, P. O., & Angelin, M. (2018). Who owns the content and who runs the risk? Dynamics of teacher change in teacher–researcher collaboration. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 963–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. (2015). Fostering teachers’ design expertise in teacher design teams: Conducive design and support activities. Curriculum Journal, 26(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.990395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Experienced and novice teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., Gardner, G. E., Robertson, L., & Robert, S. (2013a). Science Professional Learning Communities: Beyond a singular view of teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.791957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Blonder, R., Gardner, G., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013b). Nanotechnology and Nanoscale Science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1490–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintó, R., Ametller, J., Couso, D., Sassi, E., Monroy, G., Testa, I., & Lombardi, S. (2003). Some problems encountered in the introduction of innovations in secondary school science education and suggestions for overcoming them. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C. (1999). Nanoparticles and nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 1(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, D., Michailidi, E., & Sgouros, G. (2018). Development and dissemination of a teaching learning sequence on nanoscience and nanotechnology in a context of communities of learners. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00088c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science teaching: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & De Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischow, E. D., Bryan, L. A., & Bodner, G. M. (2013). Secondary science teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge as a result of integrating nanoscience content in their classroom. Cosmos, 8, 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wongsopawiro, D. S., Zwart, R. C., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Identifying pathways of teachers’ PCK development. Teachers and Teaching, 23(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giannis Sgouros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sgouros, G., Stavrou, D. (2019). Teachers’ Training in Developing Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Teaching Modules in the Context of a Community of Learners. In: McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds) Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17218-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17219-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics