Abstract
Learning progressions, or representations of how student ideas develop in particular science domains, have been argued to be important supports for teachers’ formative assessment design and enactment. While many learning progressions have been developed in recent years, they have various design features and span wide ranges of grade levels. This paper examines how six teacher learning communities drew upon different learning progressions in high school physics, chemistry, and biology to support their processes of formative assessment task design, interpretation of student ideas, and planning for feedback over the course of one academic year. Our analyses of field notes, artifacts, and teacher interviews indicate that learning progressions were used unevenly across the process of formative assessment design, with more emphasis in exploring student ideas and setting learning goals than in designing the actual task or using the progressions to sort and interpret student ideas and identify next instructional steps. However, using assessment items linked to progressions seemed to support conversations with more direct instructional action. Results are framed in the context of the potential and challenges associated with widespread use of learning progressions to support teachers’ classroom practices.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonzo, A. C., & Elby, A. (2014). The nature of student thinking and its implications for the use of learning progressions to inform classroom instruction. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O’Connor, T. Lee, & L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2). Boulder: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Alonzo, A. C., & Elby, A. (2015). One physics teacher’s use of a learning progression to generate knowledge about his students’ understanding of force and motion. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20303.
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
Board on Science Education. (2012). Framework for the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Briggs, D. C., & Peck, F. A. (2015). Using learning progressions to design vertical scales that support coherent inferences about student growth. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 13, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2015.1042814.
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63.
Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476.
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Active chemistry. Armonk: It’s About Time.
Eisenkraft, A. (2010). Active physics: An inquiry approach to physics. Armonk: It’s About Time.
Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054.
Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21156.
Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3.
Henson, K., Chattergoon, R., & Furtak, E. M. (2018). Facilitating teacher interpretation of score reports as a way to understand student ideas linked to a learning progression. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association of research on science teaching. Atlanta.
Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x.
Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.
Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019004002.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2014). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Menand, L. (2002). The metaphysical club. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175249.
Minstrell, J. (n.d.). Diagnoser: Instructional tools for science and mathematics.www.diagnoser.com/. Accessed 5 Sept 2015.
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625.
Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21061.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Haugan Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826.
Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Reflections on learning progressions. In Learning progressions in science conference. Iowa City, Iowa.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1.
Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20454.
Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2009). Learning progressions as vision tools for advancing novice teachers’ pedagogical performance. In Learning progressions in science conference. Iowa City, Iowa.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In J. F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611697.
Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20318.
Yin, R. K. (2003/2018). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1561751. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Furtak, E.M., Tayne, K. (2019). Affordances and Constraints of Learning Progression Designs in Supporting Formative Assessment. In: McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds) Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17218-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17219-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)