Advertisement

Metal Theft Solvability and Detection

  • Paul Robb
  • Richard Timothy CoupeEmail author
  • Barak Ariel
Chapter
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter identifies the solvability factors for the seven types of metal theft offences committed on railway property in England and Wales and examines how they vary geographically in different British Transport Police (BTP) regions. The analysis of BTP data for 4001 metal theft offences committed between 2009 and 2010 enables nine significant solvability factors to be identified. The most important of these are checks with scrap metal dealers, covert police activities, witnessed offences, vehicle registration information and forensic evidence. Significant solvability factors explain 64% of the variation in detection outcomes. Detection odds depend on both the number of factors present in cases and their effect sizes. The number of solvability factors was a very good measure of incident solvability, with each extra factor improving detection odds fivefold. There were marked spatial variations in incident solvability and detection outcomes, some of which reflected metal offence type differences, solvability differences and apparent variations in investigative practice. The study indicates that statistical case-screening procedures would improve metal theft detection rates cost-effectively by informing police how to prioritise the allocation of resources to the most solvable cases and avoid applying investigative effort to cases that are unlikely to be solved.

Keywords

Solvability factors Detection Metal theft Spatial variation Investigation Policing 

References

  1. Bradford, B. (2012). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 24(1), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations (Home Office Research Study 295). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary (Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Services, Paper 77). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  5. Dirikx, A., & van den Bulck, J. (2014). Media use and the process-based model for police cooperation. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: The burglary investigation decision model replication. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  7. Greenberg, B., Elliot, C. V., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Jansson, K. (2005). Volume crime investigations—A review of the research literature (Home Office Online Report OLR 44/05). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kooi, B. R. (2010). Theft of scrap metal. Problem-Specific Guides Series, No. 58. US Department of Justice, Office of Community-Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  11. Robb, P., Coupe, T., & Ariel, B. (2015). ‘Solvability’and detection of metal theft on railway property. European journal on criminal policy and research, 21(4), 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sidebottom, A., Jyoti, B., Bowers, K., Thompson, L., & Johnson, S. (2011). Theft in price-volatile markets: On the relationship between copper price and copper theft. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 396–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Skogan, W. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 16(2), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tilley, N., Robinson, A., & Burrows, J. (2007). The investigation of high volume crime. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 226–254). London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Robb
    • 1
  • Richard Timothy Coupe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barak Ariel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Criminology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations