Skip to main content

Assessing Solvability Factors in Greater Manchester, England: The Case of Residential Burglaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime Solvability Factors

Abstract

This study replicates Eck’s (Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Library of Congress, Washington, DC, 1979) Burglary Investigation Decision Model together and the Felony Investigation Decision Model developed by Greenberg et al. (Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC: U.S, 1977). A total of 400 burglary crimes from one year—200 detected burglaries and then compared to a random sample of 200 undetected burglaries—were used in the analysis, including 77 burglaries where violence has been used against the occupiers. Despite the passage of time, Eck’s (Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Library of Congress, Washington, DC, 1979) variables analyzed here were also found to be associated with higher clearance rates of burglary in Greater Manchester in 2008/9—however, not as robustly when burglaries with violence are analysed separately. Forensic evidence—footprints and fingerprints, for example—were not found to be associated with higher clearance rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrobus, E., & Pilotto, A. (2016). Improving forensic responses to residential burglaries: results of a randomized controlled field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3), 319–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Chief Police Officers/Forensic Science Service. (1996). Using forensic science effectively. London: ACPO:FSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, S. A., & Feist, A. (2005). The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: A review of the research literature. Paper 43, London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations (No. 295). Home Office research study no. 295. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2005). The effects of patrol workloads and response strength on arrests at burglary emergencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risk of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44(2), 431–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary. Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Services, Paper 77, London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: The burglary investigation decision model replication. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (1983). Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B., Elliot, C. V., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Volume I: Summary and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., Chaiken, J. M., & Petersilia, J. (1976). The criminal investigation process: A summary report. Lexington: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, K. (2005). Volume crime investigations—A review of the research literature. Online report OLR 44/05. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and justice, 42(1), 377–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N., & Ford, A. (1996). Forensic science and crime investigation. Police Research Group Paper 73, London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 716–745.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Gerard Donnellan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Donnellan, P.G., Ariel, B. (2019). Assessing Solvability Factors in Greater Manchester, England: The Case of Residential Burglaries. In: Coupe, R., Ariel, B., Mueller-Johnson, K. (eds) Crime Solvability Factors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17159-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17160-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics