Advertisement

Existing Research on Solvability

  • Tom OlphinEmail author
  • Richard Timothy Coupe
Chapter

Abstract

The objectives of this chapter are to describe existing studies of solvability factors and crime detection. The contents outline early research on the identification of solvability factors, the definition of ‘detection’, studies of high-volume and acquisitive crimes and violent crimes including homicide and sexual offences. There is also an examination of existing research into the ways in which resources and investigative effort affect solvability and case outcomes. Notable data quality issues and methodological challenges are considered. Finally, we assess the benefits of solvability analysis and the prediction of detection outcomes for policing practice.

Keywords

Solvability factors Resources Investigation Detection Prediction Algorithm 

References

  1. Addington, L. A. (2006). Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10(2), 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlberg, J., & Knutsson, J. (1990). The risk of detection. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6(1), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alderden, M. A., & Lavery, T. A. (2007). Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antrobus, E., & Pilotto, A. (2016). Improving forensic responses to residential burglaries: Results of a randomized controlled field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3), 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Association of Chief Police Officers. (1996). Using forensic science effectively. London: ACPO.Google Scholar
  6. Audit Commission. (1993). Helping with enquiries: Tackling crime effectively. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  7. Ayres, I. (2007). Supercrunchers: How anything can be predicted. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  8. Balemba, S., Beauregard, E., & Martineau, M. (2014). Getting away with murder: A thematic approach to solved and unsolved sexual homicides using crime scene factors. Police Practice and Research, 15(3), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baskin, D., & Sommers, I. (2010). The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baskin, D., & Sommers, I. (2012). The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of assault and robbery incidents. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 23(2), 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beauregard, E., & Martineau, M. (2014). No body, no crime? The role of forensic awareness in avoiding police detection in cases of sexual homicide. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bieck, W., & Kessler, D. A. (1977). Response time analysis. Kansas City: Missouri Board of Police Commissioners.Google Scholar
  13. Blake, L., & Coupe, R. T. (2001). The impact of single and two-officer patrols on catching burglars in the act. The British Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bloch, P. B., & Bell, J. (1976). Managing investigations: The Rochester system. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Bond, J. (2007). Value of DNA evidence in detecting crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(1), 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bradbury, S., & Feist, A. (2005). The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: A review of the research literature (Home Office Online Report 43/05). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  17. Brandl, S. G., & Frank, J. (1994). The relationship between evidence, detective effort, and the disposition of burglary and robbery investigations. American Journal of Police, 13(3), 149–168.Google Scholar
  18. Briody, M. (2004). The effects of DNA evidence on homicide cases in court. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, J. M., Hamilton, C., & O’Neill, D. (2007). Characteristics associated with rape attrition and the role played by scepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(4), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, K. M., & Keppel, R. D. (2012). Child abduction murder: The impact of forensic evidence on solvability. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burrows, J., Tilley, N. (2005). An overview of attrition patterns. Online Report 45/05. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  22. Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations (Home Office Research Study 295). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  23. Burrows, J., & Tarling, R. (1982). Clearing up crime. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  24. Cardarelli, A. P., & Cavanagh, D. (1992). Uncleared homicides in the United States: An exploratory study of trends and patterns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  25. Chaiken, J. M. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Volume II: Survey of municipal and county police departments. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. Chaiken, J. M., Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1976). The criminal investigation process: A summary report. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  27. Clawson, C., & Chang, S. K. (1977). Relationship of response delays and arrest rates. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 5(1), 53–68.Google Scholar
  28. Cordner, G. W. (1989). Police agency size and investigative effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17(3), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Corwin, M. (1997). The killing season: A summer inside an LAPD homicide division. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  30. Coupe, R. T. (2014). An evaluation of the effects of police resources and incident solvability on crime detection (Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper 46). Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law.Google Scholar
  31. Coupe, R. T. (2016). Evaluating the effects of resources and solvability on burglary detection. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 26(5), 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coupe, R. T., & Blake, L. (2005). The effects of patrol workloads and response strength on burglary emergencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Coupe, R. T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness strategies and the risks of offenders being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44(2), 431–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coupe, R. T., & Girling, A. J. (2001). Modelling police success in catching burglars in the act. Omega, 29(1), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary (Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Services Paper 77). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  36. Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (2000). Catching offenders in the act: An empirical study of police effectiveness in handling ‘immediate response’ residential burglary. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Coupe, R. T., & Kaur, S. (2005). The role of alarms and CCTV in detecting non-residential burglary. Security Journal, 18(2), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. D’Alessio, S. J., & Stolzenberg, I. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81(4), 1381–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Davis, R. C., Jensen, C. J., Burgette, L., & Burnett, K. (2014). Working smarter on cold cases: Identifying factors associated with successful cold case investigations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(2), 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Donnellan, P. G. (2011). To what extent is burglary detection a consequence of effective investigation? (Unpublished MSt thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  41. Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: The burglary investigation decision model replication. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  42. Eck, J. E. (1983). Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  43. Eitle, D., Stolzenberg, I., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2005). Police organizational factors, the racial composition of the police, and the probability of arrest. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fallik, S., & Wells, W. (2015). Testing previously unsubmitted sexual assault kits: What are the investigative results? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(6), 598–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fitzgerald, J. (2006). The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  46. Folk, J. F. (1971). Municipal detective systems—A quantitative approach (Technical Report Number 55). Boston: Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Geberth, V. J. (1996). Practical homicide investigation: Tactics, procedures and forensic techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  48. Gill, M., Hart, J., Livingstone, K., & Stevens, J. (1996). The crime allocation system: Police investigations into burglary and auto crime (Police Research Series Paper 16). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  49. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hindelang, M. J. (1979). A study of the behavior of law. American Sociological Review, 44(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Greenberg, B., Elliot, C. V., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  51. Greenwood, P. W. (1970). An analysis of the apprehension activities of the New York City Police Department. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  52. Greenwood, P. W., Chaiken, J. M., Petersilia, J., & Prusoff, L. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Volume III: Observations and analysis. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  53. Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Volume I: Summary and policy implications. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  54. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hester, M. (2006). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. A. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Home Office. (2011). User guide to Home Office crime statistics. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  58. Hopkins, M. (2009). Why are arson detection rates so low? A study of the factors that promote and inhibit the detection of arson. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 3(1), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ingemann-Hansen, O., Brink, O., Sabroe, S., Sørensen, V., & Charles, A. V. (2008). Legal aspects of sexual violence—Does forensic evidence make a difference? Forensic Science International, 180(2–3), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Innes, M. (2002). The ‘process structures’ of police homicide investigations. The British Journal of Criminology, 42(4), 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Isaacs, H. (1967). A study of communications, crimes and arrests in a metropolitan police department. Task force report: Science and technology. Washington, DC: UN Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  62. Jiao, A. Y. (2007). Explaining homicide clearance: An analysis of Chicago homicide data 1965–1995. Criminal Justice Studies, 20(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Keel, T. G., Jarvis, J. P., & Muirhead, Y. E. (2009). An exploratory analysis of factors affecting homicide investigations: Examining the dynamics of murder clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 13(1), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Killmier, B. (2014). Offenders and their offences: Convicted burglars in Adelaide (MSt thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lamme, M., & Bernasco, W. (2013). Are mobile offenders less likely to be caught? The influence of the geographical dispersion of serial offenders’ crime locations on their probability of arrest. European Journal of Criminology, 10(2), 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Langworthy, R. H., & Hindelang, M. J. (1979). Effects of police agency size on the use of police employees: A re-examination of Ostrom, Parks and Whitaker. Police Studies: The International Review of Police Development, 2(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  68. Lee, C. (2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Litwin, K. J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Litwin, K. J., & Xu, Y. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lockwood, B. (2014). What clears burglary offenses? Estimating the influences of multiple perspectives of burglary clearance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 37(4), 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Marché, G. E. (1994). The production of homicide solutions: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53(4), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  74. Meehl, P. E. (1986). Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 370–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Menaker, T. A., Campbell, B. A., & Wells, W. (2016). The use of forensic evidence in sexual assault investigations: Perceptions of sex crimes investigators. Violence Against Women, 23(4), 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mouzos, J., & Muller, D. (2001). Solvability factors of homicide in Australia: An exploratory analysis. In Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  77. Newburn, T. (2007). Understanding investigation. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  78. Newiss, G. (2002). Responding to and investigating street robbery (unpublished). In K. Jansson (Ed.), Volume crime investigations—A review of the research literature (Home Office Online Report OLR 44/05). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  79. Olphin, T. W. L. (2015). Solving violent crime: Targeting factors that predict clearance of non-domestic violent offences (Unpublished MSt thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  80. Ostrom, E., Parks, R., & Whitaker, G. (1978). Police agency size: Some evidence on its effects. Police Studies, 1(1), 34–46.Google Scholar
  81. Ousey, G. C., & Lee, M. R. (2010). To know the unknown: The decline in homicide clearance rates, 1980–2000. Criminal Justice Review, 35(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Paine, C. (2012). Solvability factors in dwelling burglaries in Thames Valley (unpublished MSt thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  83. Paine, C., & Ariel, B. (2013). Solvability analysis: Increasing the likelihood of detection in completed, attempted and in-progress burglaries. Paper presented at the 6th International Evidence-Based Policing Conference, Cambridge, 8–10 July 2013.Google Scholar
  84. Paré, P., Felson, R. B., & Ouimet, M. (2007). Community variation in crime detection: A multilevel analysis with comments on assessing police performance. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Parkinson, P. N., Shrimpton, S., Swanston, H. Y., O’Toole, B. I., & Oates, R. K. (2002). The process of attrition in child sexual assault cases: A case flow analysis of criminal investigations and prosecutions. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pelfrey, W. V., Jr., & Hanna, C. A. (2011). The role of suspect and victim information in investigation outcomes: Revisiting Eck’s triage theory. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 11, 91–100.Google Scholar
  87. Peterson, J. L., Hickman, M. J., Strom, K. J., & Johnson, D. J. (2013). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58(S1), S78–S90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Peterson, J., Sommers, I., Baskin, D., & Johnson, D. (2010). The role and impact of forensic evidence in the criminal justice process. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  89. Ponce, C., Salfati, C. G., Barton, S. M., & Shon, P. C. (2007). Homicide solvability factors in El Salvador: An initial exploration. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 7(1), 151–172.Google Scholar
  90. Puckett, J. L., & Lundman, R. J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Randol, B. M., & Sanders, C. M. (2015). Examining the barriers to sexual assault evidence processing in Washington State: What’s the hold up? Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, 16(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
  92. Regoeczi, W. C., Jarvis, J., & Riedel, M. (2008). Clearing murders: Is it about time? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Regoeczi, W. C., Kennedy, L. W., & Silverman, R. A. (2000). Uncleared homicides: A Canada/United States comparison. Homicide Studies, 4(2), 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Riedel, M., & Rinehart, T. A. (1996). Murder clearances and missing data. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19(2), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Robb, P., Coupe, R. T., & Ariel, B. (2015). ‘Solvability’ and detection of metal theft on railway property. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(4), 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Roberts, A. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Roberts, A. (2008). The influences of incident and contextual characteristics on crime clearance of nonlethal violence: A multilevel event history analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roberts, A. (2014). Adjusting rates of homicide clearance by arrest for investigation difficulty: Modelling incident- and jurisdiction-level obstacles. Homicide Studies, 19(3), 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Robinson, A., & Tilley, N. (2009). Factors influencing police performance in the investigation of volume crimes in England and Wales. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Roman, J. K., Reid, S. E., Chalfin, A. J., & Knight, C. R. (2009). The DNA field experiment: A randomized trial of the cost-effectiveness of using DNA to solve property crimes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rydberg, J., & Pizarro, J. M. (2014). Victim lifestyle as a correlate of homicide clearance. Homicide Studies, 18(4), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sarbin, T. R. (1944). The logic of prediction in psychology. Psychological Review, 51(4), 210–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 377–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Skogan, W. G., & Antunes, G. E. (1979). Information, apprehension and deterrence: Exploring the limits of police productivity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(3), 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Snyder, H. N. (1999). The overrepresentation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Spelman, W., & Brown, D. K. (1981). Calling the police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington, DC: Police Research Executive Forum.Google Scholar
  107. Stevens, J. M., & Stipak, B. (1982). Factors associated with police apprehension productivity. Police Science and Administration, 10(1), 52–57.Google Scholar
  108. Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2011). What is known about the effectiveness of police practices? John Jay College of Criminal Justice. http://www.jjay.cuny.edu/Telep_Weisburd.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2014.
  109. Tilley, N., & Burrows, J. (2005). An overview of attrition patterns (Home Office Online Report 45/05). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  110. Tilley, N., & Ford, A. (1996). Forensic science and crime investigation (Crime Prevention and Detection Series, Paper 73). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  111. Tilley, N., Robinson, A., & Burrows, J. (2007). The investigation of high volume crime. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 226–254). London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  112. Tillyer, M. S., & Tillyer, R. (2015). Maybe I should do this alone: A comparison of solo and co-offending robbery outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 32(6), 1064–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tillyer, M. S., Tillyer, R., & Kelsay, J. (2015). The nature and influence of the victim–offender relationship in kidnapping incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(5), 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Waegel, W. B. (1982). Patterns of police investigation of urban crimes. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10(4), 452–465.Google Scholar
  115. Webbink, D., van Erp, J., & van Gastel, F. (2017). The effect of media exposure of suspects on solving crime. The Economic Journal, 127(600), 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can the police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wellford, C., & Cronin, J. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the detection of homicides: A multivariate study. Washington, DC: Justice Research Statistics Association.Google Scholar
  118. Williams, V. L., & Sumrall, R. O. (1982). Productivity measures in the criminal investigation function. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10(2), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wolfgang, M. E. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations