Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Richard Timothy CoupeEmail author
  • Barak Ariel
Chapter
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

This final chapter draws together findings from the studies on incident solvability, its relationship with resources and the issues faced by police officers in improving crime detection outcomes. It contains a review of the importance of different categories of solvability factors for detecting different types of crime and the ways they combine to enable this, including an assessment of the levels of variation in detection outcomes that may be explained and predicted. There is also a critical evaluation of crime seriousness and balancing the waste of resources due to investigating groups of low-solvability cases against the loss of detections if their investigation is discontinued; the implications of offender prolificacy and versatility; of the particular problems posed by cybercrime; rapid response and directed patrol; the issues relating to geographical variations in crime type incidence, solvability and the provision of investigative resources; changes in the effective use of investigative capacity; and the need for research into which policing and investigative activities should be applied to particular subsets of cases in different investigative stages in order to improve effective capacity utilisation and cost-effectively raise detection outcomes. There is an evaluation of the scientific approach to investigating and solving crime, advocated in this volume, in complementing police experience. This highlights the importance of solvability factor analysis in promoting better use of investigative capacity and in making substantial contributions to what may be termed ‘lean policing’, an approach which aims to secure the most cost-effective outcomes from available resource inputs.

Keywords

Prediction Detection Solvability Cost-effectiveness Capacity use ‘Lean policing’ Geographical variation Resources 

References

  1. Ashby, M. P. J. (2017). Comparing methods for measuring crime harm severity. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(4), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audit Commission. (1993). Helping with enquiries: Tackling crime effectively. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, P. (2015). Online vehicle sales fraud: Can police target prevention messages more efficiently and effectively? (M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Blakely, R. (2018, January 08). US murder rate plunges after police algorithm predicts crime. The Times.Google Scholar
  5. Blumstein, A., Cohen, D., Das, S., & Miotra, D. (1988). Specialization and seriousness during adult criminal careers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4(4), 303–345.Google Scholar
  6. Coupe, T. (2017). Burglary decisions (Chapter 31). In W. Bernasco, H. Ellfers, & J.-L. van Gelder (Eds.), Oxford handbook on offender decision making (pp. 655–683). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  7. Coupe, R. T. (2016). Evaluating the effects of resources and solvability on burglary detection. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 26(5), 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coupe, T., & Fox, B. H. (2015). A risky business: How do access, exposure and guardians affect the chances of non-residential burglars being seen? Security Journal, 28(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyle, R. (2018). Personal communication regarding use of patrol resources in Devon and Cornwall Police Service, U.K.Google Scholar
  10. Eck, J. E. (1983). Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Washington, D.C: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton, F. (2018). Shoplifters can get away with taking less than £50. The Times, 29/11/18.Google Scholar
  12. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E., & Wikstrom, P. O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Jackman, R. (2016). Profiling sex offending in Norfolk (M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Jacoby, J. E., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The structure of punishment norms: Applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(1), 245–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. (2008). The near-repeat burglary phenomenon. In S. Chainey & J. Radcliffe (Eds.), Crime mapping cases studies: Practice and research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Paternoster, R., & Tibbetts, S. G. (2016). White-collar crime and perceptual deterrence. In S. R. Van Slyke, M. L. Benson, & F. Cullen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of white-collar crime. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  17. Payne, B. K. (2016). Effects on white-collar defendants of criminal justice attention and sanctions. In S. R. Van Slyke, M. L. Benson, & F. Cullen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of white-collar crime. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  18. Rowley, C. (2013). A level 2 outcome evaluation of a police intervention aimed at reducing future burglary dwellings in the immediate vicinity of a burglary dwelling (Unpublished M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, P., & Goddard, M. (2002). Performance management and operational research: A marriage made in heaven? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strathern, M. (1997). Improving ratings: Audit of the British university system. European Review, 5, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tompson, L., & Coupe, R. T. (2018). Time and criminal opportunity (Chapter 29). In W. Bernasco & S. Johnson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of environmental criminology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  22. Ungoed-Thomas, J., Clark, R., & Henry, R. (2018, June 17). Where’s the justice? Struggling police solve only 9% of all crime. The Sunday Times, p. 4.Google Scholar
  23. Vo, Q., & Coupe, R. T. (2017). Tracking the outcomes of 6,000 missing persons. In National Missing Persons Conference, Sydney, Australia, November, 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Weems, J. (2014). Testing PCSO cocooning of near repeat burglary locations (Unpublished M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  25. Wright, O. (2013). Urban to rural: An exploratory analysis of burglary and vehicle crime within a rural context (M.St. thesis). Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations