Abstract
This final chapter draws together findings from the studies on incident solvability, its relationship with resources and the issues faced by police officers in improving crime detection outcomes. It contains a review of the importance of different categories of solvability factors for detecting different types of crime and the ways they combine to enable this, including an assessment of the levels of variation in detection outcomes that may be explained and predicted. There is also a critical evaluation of crime seriousness and balancing the waste of resources due to investigating groups of low-solvability cases against the loss of detections if their investigation is discontinued; the implications of offender prolificacy and versatility; of the particular problems posed by cybercrime; rapid response and directed patrol; the issues relating to geographical variations in crime type incidence, solvability and the provision of investigative resources; changes in the effective use of investigative capacity; and the need for research into which policing and investigative activities should be applied to particular subsets of cases in different investigative stages in order to improve effective capacity utilisation and cost-effectively raise detection outcomes. There is an evaluation of the scientific approach to investigating and solving crime, advocated in this volume, in complementing police experience. This highlights the importance of solvability factor analysis in promoting better use of investigative capacity and in making substantial contributions to what may be termed ‘lean policing’, an approach which aims to secure the most cost-effective outcomes from available resource inputs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Using data from the data.police.uk database, for which data are sourced from a private server managed by the UK Home Office, to which police forces upload their monthly records which the MoJ verifies.
References
Ashby, M. P. J. (2017). Comparing methods for measuring crime harm severity. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(4), 439–454.
Audit Commission. (1993). Helping with enquiries: Tackling crime effectively. London: HMSO.
Barnard, P. (2015). Online vehicle sales fraud: Can police target prevention messages more efficiently and effectively? (M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge.
Blakely, R. (2018, January 08). US murder rate plunges after police algorithm predicts crime. The Times.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, D., Das, S., & Miotra, D. (1988). Specialization and seriousness during adult criminal careers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4(4), 303–345.
Coupe, T. (2017). Burglary decisions (Chapter 31). In W. Bernasco, H. Ellfers, & J.-L. van Gelder (Eds.), Oxford handbook on offender decision making (pp. 655–683). Oxford: OUP.
Coupe, R. T. (2016). Evaluating the effects of resources and solvability on burglary detection. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 26(5), 563–587.
Coupe, T., & Fox, B. H. (2015). A risky business: How do access, exposure and guardians affect the chances of non-residential burglars being seen? Security Journal, 28(1), 71–92.
Doyle, R. (2018). Personal communication regarding use of patrol resources in Devon and Cornwall Police Service, U.K.
Eck, J. E. (1983). Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Washington, D.C: Police Executive Research Forum.
Hamilton, F. (2018). Shoplifters can get away with taking less than £50. The Times, 29/11/18.
Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E., & Wikstrom, P. O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Jackman, R. (2016). Profiling sex offending in Norfolk (M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge.
Jacoby, J. E., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The structure of punishment norms: Applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(1), 245–312.
Johnson, D. (2008). The near-repeat burglary phenomenon. In S. Chainey & J. Radcliffe (Eds.), Crime mapping cases studies: Practice and research. Chichester: Wiley.
Paternoster, R., & Tibbetts, S. G. (2016). White-collar crime and perceptual deterrence. In S. R. Van Slyke, M. L. Benson, & F. Cullen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of white-collar crime. Oxford: OUP.
Payne, B. K. (2016). Effects on white-collar defendants of criminal justice attention and sanctions. In S. R. Van Slyke, M. L. Benson, & F. Cullen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of white-collar crime. Oxford: OUP.
Rowley, C. (2013). A level 2 outcome evaluation of a police intervention aimed at reducing future burglary dwellings in the immediate vicinity of a burglary dwelling (Unpublished M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology.
Smith, P., & Goddard, M. (2002). Performance management and operational research: A marriage made in heaven? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3), 247–255.
Strathern, M. (1997). Improving ratings: Audit of the British university system. European Review, 5, 305–321.
Tompson, L., & Coupe, R. T. (2018). Time and criminal opportunity (Chapter 29). In W. Bernasco & S. Johnson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of environmental criminology. Oxford: OUP.
Ungoed-Thomas, J., Clark, R., & Henry, R. (2018, June 17). Where’s the justice? Struggling police solve only 9% of all crime. The Sunday Times, p. 4.
Vo, Q., & Coupe, R. T. (2017). Tracking the outcomes of 6,000 missing persons. In National Missing Persons Conference, Sydney, Australia, November, 2017.
Weems, J. (2014). Testing PCSO cocooning of near repeat burglary locations (Unpublished M.St. thesis). University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology.
Wright, O. (2013). Urban to rural: An exploratory analysis of burglary and vehicle crime within a rural context (M.St. thesis). Cambridge University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coupe, R.T., Ariel, B. (2019). Conclusions. In: Coupe, R., Ariel, B., Mueller-Johnson, K. (eds) Crime Solvability Factors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17159-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17160-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)