Abstract
Recombinant proteins are the fundamental product of modern biotechnology. LAL is the purified protein extracted from horseshoe crabs used to test pharmaceutical products for bacterial endotoxins; the use of LAL has ensured the safe supply of medicine for over 30 years. A synthetic recombinant protein Factor C (rFC), the first protein in the LAL cascade, has been commercially available for 15 years, however market uptake has been limited for various reasons. With respect to horseshoe crab conservation and for other species that depend on the horseshoe crab, including the threatened Red Knot shorebird, the use of rFC for the detection of bacterial endotoxins was successfully validated for use with multiple pharmaceutical products. A validation strategy is described herein and an example validation protocol is provided for the convenience of the end-user.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Handling stress has been shown to include time out of water as Limulus breathes via book gills not lungs.
- 2.
The blood is a complex “soup” and the lyophilized extracted lysate has removed the liquid from that soup leaving the various proteins (cascade, Factor G, serpins, antimicrobials, etc.) to be reconstituted.
- 3.
Note that the preparations of standards and spiking solutions are for example only. The stock concentration of endotoxin is dependent on the specific kit used for an assay.
References
Armstrong P, Conrad M. Blood collection from the American horseshoe crab, Limulus Polyphemus. J Vis Exp. 2008;(20):958.
Wendt D. Two tons of pig parts: making insulin in the 1920s. In: O Say Can You See? National Museum of American History; 2013. https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/2013/11/two-tons-of-pig-parts-making-insulin-in-the-1920s.html
Munro M. What’s killing the world’s shorebirds. Nature. 2017;541:16–20.
Tan Y, Jardine S. Considering economic efficiency in ecosystem-based management: the case of horseshoe crabs in Deleware Bay. Environ Resource Econ. 2018;1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0204-x.
Krisfalusi-Gannon J, et al. The role of horseshoe crabs in the biomedical industry and recent trends impacting species sustainability. Front Mar Sci. 2018;5:185.
Eyler S, Michels S, Schmidtke M. 2017 review of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission fishery management plan for horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) 2016 Fishing Year. Arlington, VA: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission; 2017.
Smith DR, et al. Conservation status of the American horseshoe crab, (Limulus polyphemus): a regional assessment. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2017;27:135–75.
Anderson RL, Watson WH 3rd, Chabot CC. Sublethal behavioral and physiological effects of the biomedical bleeding process of the American horseshoe crab, Limulus Polyphemus. Biol Bull. 2013;225(3):137–51.
Carmichael RH, Botton ML, Shin PK, Cheung SG. Changing global perspectives on horseshoe crab biology, conservation and management. Cham: Springer; 2015.
Chesler C. Medical labs may be killing horseshoe crabs. Scientific American; 2016. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/medical-labs-may-be-killing-horseshoe-crabs/
Leschen AS, Correia SJ. Mortality in female horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) from biomedical bleeding and handling: implications for fisheries management. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 2010;43(2):135–47.
Liao Y, Hsieh HL, Xu S, Zhong Q, Lei J, Liang M, Fang H, Xu L, Lin W, et al. Wisdom of Crowds reveals decline of Asian horseshoe crabs in Beibu Gulf, China. Oryx. 2017; 53(2): 222–229
Tanacredi, et al. An integrative approach to horseshoe crab multiple use and sustainability. In: Berkson J, National Marine Fisheries Service, editors. Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs. Boston, MA: Springer; 2009.
Ding JL, Ho B. Singapore, Patent number: US 6,645,724 B1, 11 Nov 2003.
Sargent W. Crab wars: a tale of horseshoe crabs, bioterrorism, and human health. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England; 2002.
Loverock B, Simon B, Burgenson A, Baines A. A recombinant factor C procedure for the detection of gram-negative bacterial endotoxin. USP Pharmacopeial Forum. 2010;36:321–9.
Kikuchi Y, Haishima Y, Fukui C, Murai T, Nakagawa Y, Ebisawa A, et al. Collaborative study on the bacterial endotoxins test using recombinant factor C-based procedure for detection of lipopolysaccharides. Pharm Med Device Regul Sci. 2017;48(4):252–60.
Bolden JS, Smith KR. Application of recombinant factor C reagent for the detection of bacterial endotoxins in pharmaceutical products. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2017;71:405–12.
Devulder G. A time-saving endotoxin assay based on recombinant horseshoe crab factor (rFC) including a novel microplate. 2018 PDA Europe Conference on Pharmaceutical Microbiology.
Chen L, Mozier N. Comparison of Limulus amebocyte lysate test methods for endotoxin measurement in protein solutions. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;80:180–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix I: Example Alternative Validation Protocol
Appendix I: Example Alternative Validation Protocol
The following protocol is an example product-specific validation worksheet using the alternative end-point fluorescence technique with rFC reagent. The protocol is provided to aid users in developing their own protocol, and is predicated on a documented holistic validation strategy.
1.1 General Information
Method code | [Local Method Code] |
---|---|
Test type | Safety |
Analyte(s) | Bacterial endotoxins |
Product matrix | [Insert Product Matrix] |
Lab performing validation | [Insert Lab] |
Principle of procedure | Fluorescence end-point using recombinant Factor C (rFC) reagent for the detection of bacterial endotoxins |
Validation protocol | General Validation Protocol for [Insert Local Method] by Fluorometric Analysis ([Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]) |
Method | [Insert Local Method] |
This document must be completed with the compound specific information, signed and dated by the author, technical reviewer, management approver, and quality approver prior to execution of the experiments.
1.2 Purpose
This document provides the compound specific information relating to the validation of the method for this product and the approval to use the general validation protocol listed above for this method validation. The combination of these two documents meets the requirements of [Insert Applicable Quality SOPs].
The general validation protocol ([Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]) describes the experiments and acceptance criteria to validate the fluorescence end-point method (rFC) for the detection of bacterial endotoxins. This document provides the additional information needed to validate for a specific item with experimentally pre-determined product specific preparation instructions, which includes an optimal sample test concentration (dilution factor) and test sensitivity in relation to the product limit, the maximum valid dilution (MVD), and other relevant sample preparation details (e.g., diluent, etc.)
1.3 Test Information
Sample(s) to be used in the experiments are listed below.
Lot numbers will be documented at the time of execution.
The validation samples are representative of the current manufacturing process.
MVD = (Limit × Sample Concentration)/Assay Sensitivity
Result Calculation = (Raw Result × Dilution Factor)/Sample Concentration
1.4 Standard Curve Preparation
Prepare the 0.01 λ standard curve as directed in [Insert Local Method] using the assay sensitivity as described in Test Information, or using the following exampleFootnote 3:
-
1.0 EU/mL:100 μL of 20 EU/mL + 1900 μL of LRW
-
0.1 EU/mL:200 μL of 1.0 EU/mL + 1800 μL of LRW
-
0.01 EU/mL:200 μL of 0.1 EU/mL + 1800 μL of LRW
An example preparation of spiking solutions for use in the high and low spike accuracy and precision experiments is below:
-
3.16 EU/mL:316 μL of [20 EU/mL] + 1684 μL of LRW
-
0.316 EU/mL:200 μL of [3.16 EU/mL] + 1800 μL of LRW
1.5 Sample Preparation
For each of three independent assays, prepare a sample of each lot as follows. Fresh preparations are made for each independent assay.
Solution | Preparation | Dilution Factor | Conc. (mg/mL) |
A | |||
B | |||
C | |||
D |
1.6 Positive Product Control (PPC)
Prepare the PPC as directed in [Insert Local Method] using Solution D above and the 1.0 EU/mL standard described in Test Information.
1.7 Accuracy and Precision
Prepare the accuracy and precision experiment samples by spiking 10 μL of the 3.16 EU/mL (high) and 0.316 EU/mL (low) spiking solutions into Solution D aliquots in the test plate.
1.8 pH Suitability
Determine item pH suitability by evaluating the item pH of the neat sample solution, diluted test solution, or the diluted test solution combined 1:1 with rFC reagent. Once the pH is shown to be within the acceptable range of 6.0–8.0, it is unnecessary to test subsequent solutions.
1.9 Analysis and Documentation of Results
Documentation of the execution of this protocol may be recorded in printed copies of the protocol attachment. Each independent sample analysis must meet all data acceptance criteria for the result(s) to be considered valid and acceptable for use in the validation documentation. Report results as per software report. [Insert Local Investigation Scenario Requirements].
1.10 Data Acceptance Criteria Per Assay
Parameter | Acceptance criteria | Rationale |
---|---|---|
r | 0.980–1.000 | Criteria from compendia and per Global Method |
y-intercept | 2.500–5.000 | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
Slope | 0.760–1.110 | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
PPC | 50–200% | Criteria from compendia and per Global Method |
%CV of top standard | <25.00% | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
% CV of middle standard | <25.00% | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
% CV of low standard | <25.00% | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
%CV of sample | <25.00%, if applicable | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
%CV of PPC Sample | <25.00% | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
pH | pH of test article at time of assay must be within 6.0–8.0. | Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method |
1.11 Validation Criteria
Parameter | Acceptance criteria | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Accuracy | Average recovery (%) of each challenge concentration must be NLT 50% or NMT 200% of theoretical concentration | [Insert Local Validation Strategy Document] |
Precision | Precision of each challenge recovery (%CV) must be <25.00% Based on final average of each spiked concentration (high and low); calculated and reported in the validation report | [Insert Local Validation Strategy Document] |
Inhibition/Enhancement | Positive product control (PPC) recovery is 50–200% | [Insert Local Validation Strategy Document] |
pH | pH value must be 6.0–8.0 | [Insert Local Validation Strategy Document] |
1.12 Analysis of Failed Results
If the validation criteria are not met a technical review of the results will be initiated to determine appropriate action.
A qualified individual will evaluate the data to determine if the acceptance criteria outlined in this protocol have been met. If the validating lab does not meet the criteria set forth in this protocol, an investigation and any supplemental actions will be conducted as per local procedure.
1.13 Departures from Protocol
Summarize any protocol departures or investigations including whether data were accepted or not with rationale and references to the detailed information as per local standard operating procedures.
1.14 Reasons for Revision
Version | Reason | Author |
0 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolden, J. (2019). Recombinant Factor C. In: Williams, K. (eds) Endotoxin Detection and Control in Pharma, Limulus, and Mammalian Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17148-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17148-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17148-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)