Skip to main content

Abstract

Recombinant proteins are the fundamental product of modern biotechnology. LAL is the purified protein extracted from horseshoe crabs used to test pharmaceutical products for bacterial endotoxins; the use of LAL has ensured the safe supply of medicine for over 30 years. A synthetic recombinant protein Factor C (rFC), the first protein in the LAL cascade, has been commercially available for 15 years, however market uptake has been limited for various reasons. With respect to horseshoe crab conservation and for other species that depend on the horseshoe crab, including the threatened Red Knot shorebird, the use of rFC for the detection of bacterial endotoxins was successfully validated for use with multiple pharmaceutical products. A validation strategy is described herein and an example validation protocol is provided for the convenience of the end-user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Handling stress has been shown to include time out of water as Limulus breathes via book gills not lungs.

  2. 2.

    The blood is a complex “soup” and the lyophilized extracted lysate has removed the liquid from that soup leaving the various proteins (cascade, Factor G, serpins, antimicrobials, etc.) to be reconstituted.

  3. 3.

    Note that the preparations of standards and spiking solutions are for example only. The stock concentration of endotoxin is dependent on the specific kit used for an assay.

References

  1. Armstrong P, Conrad M. Blood collection from the American horseshoe crab, Limulus Polyphemus. J Vis Exp. 2008;(20):958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wendt D. Two tons of pig parts: making insulin in the 1920s. In: O Say Can You See? National Museum of American History; 2013. https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/2013/11/two-tons-of-pig-parts-making-insulin-in-the-1920s.html

  3. Munro M. What’s killing the world’s shorebirds. Nature. 2017;541:16–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan Y, Jardine S. Considering economic efficiency in ecosystem-based management: the case of horseshoe crabs in Deleware Bay. Environ Resource Econ. 2018;1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0204-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krisfalusi-Gannon J, et al. The role of horseshoe crabs in the biomedical industry and recent trends impacting species sustainability. Front Mar Sci. 2018;5:185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eyler S, Michels S, Schmidtke M. 2017 review of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission fishery management plan for horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) 2016 Fishing Year. Arlington, VA: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith DR, et al. Conservation status of the American horseshoe crab, (Limulus polyphemus): a regional assessment. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2017;27:135–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson RL, Watson WH 3rd, Chabot CC. Sublethal behavioral and physiological effects of the biomedical bleeding process of the American horseshoe crab, Limulus Polyphemus. Biol Bull. 2013;225(3):137–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carmichael RH, Botton ML, Shin PK, Cheung SG. Changing global perspectives on horseshoe crab biology, conservation and management. Cham: Springer; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chesler C. Medical labs may be killing horseshoe crabs. Scientific American; 2016. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/medical-labs-may-be-killing-horseshoe-crabs/

  11. Leschen AS, Correia SJ. Mortality in female horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus) from biomedical bleeding and handling: implications for fisheries management. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 2010;43(2):135–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao Y, Hsieh HL, Xu S, Zhong Q, Lei J, Liang M, Fang H, Xu L, Lin W, et al. Wisdom of Crowds reveals decline of Asian horseshoe crabs in Beibu Gulf, China. Oryx. 2017; 53(2): 222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanacredi, et al. An integrative approach to horseshoe crab multiple use and sustainability. In: Berkson J, National Marine Fisheries Service, editors. Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs. Boston, MA: Springer; 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding JL, Ho B. Singapore, Patent number: US 6,645,724 B1, 11 Nov 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sargent W. Crab wars: a tale of horseshoe crabs, bioterrorism, and human health. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loverock B, Simon B, Burgenson A, Baines A. A recombinant factor C procedure for the detection of gram-negative bacterial endotoxin. USP Pharmacopeial Forum. 2010;36:321–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kikuchi Y, Haishima Y, Fukui C, Murai T, Nakagawa Y, Ebisawa A, et al. Collaborative study on the bacterial endotoxins test using recombinant factor C-based procedure for detection of lipopolysaccharides. Pharm Med Device Regul Sci. 2017;48(4):252–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bolden JS, Smith KR. Application of recombinant factor C reagent for the detection of bacterial endotoxins in pharmaceutical products. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2017;71:405–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Devulder G. A time-saving endotoxin assay based on recombinant horseshoe crab factor (rFC) including a novel microplate. 2018 PDA Europe Conference on Pharmaceutical Microbiology.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L, Mozier N. Comparison of Limulus amebocyte lysate test methods for endotoxin measurement in protein solutions. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;80:180–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Bolden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: Example Alternative Validation Protocol

Appendix I: Example Alternative Validation Protocol

The following protocol is an example product-specific validation worksheet using the alternative end-point fluorescence technique with rFC reagent. The protocol is provided to aid users in developing their own protocol, and is predicated on a documented holistic validation strategy.

1.1 General Information

Method code

[Local Method Code]

Test type

Safety

Analyte(s)

Bacterial endotoxins

Product matrix

[Insert Product Matrix]

Lab performing validation

[Insert Lab]

Principle of procedure

Fluorescence end-point using recombinant Factor C (rFC) reagent for the detection of bacterial endotoxins

Validation protocol

General Validation Protocol for [Insert Local Method] by Fluorometric Analysis ([Insert Local Validation Strategy Document])

Method

[Insert Local Method]

This document must be completed with the compound specific information, signed and dated by the author, technical reviewer, management approver, and quality approver prior to execution of the experiments.

1.2 Purpose

This document provides the compound specific information relating to the validation of the method for this product and the approval to use the general validation protocol listed above for this method validation. The combination of these two documents meets the requirements of [Insert Applicable Quality SOPs].

The general validation protocol ([Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]) describes the experiments and acceptance criteria to validate the fluorescence end-point method (rFC) for the detection of bacterial endotoxins. This document provides the additional information needed to validate for a specific item with experimentally pre-determined product specific preparation instructions, which includes an optimal sample test concentration (dilution factor) and test sensitivity in relation to the product limit, the maximum valid dilution (MVD), and other relevant sample preparation details (e.g., diluent, etc.)

1.3 Test Information

Sample(s) to be used in the experiments are listed below.

figure a

Lot numbers will be documented at the time of execution.

The validation samples are representative of the current manufacturing process.

figure b

MVD = (Limit × Sample Concentration)/Assay Sensitivity

Result Calculation = (Raw Result × Dilution Factor)/Sample Concentration

1.4 Standard Curve Preparation

Prepare the 0.01 λ standard curve as directed in [Insert Local Method] using the assay sensitivity as described in Test Information, or using the following exampleFootnote 3:

  • 1.0 EU/mL:100 μL of 20 EU/mL + 1900 μL of LRW

  • 0.1 EU/mL:200 μL of 1.0 EU/mL + 1800 μL of LRW

  • 0.01 EU/mL:200 μL of 0.1 EU/mL + 1800 μL of LRW

An example preparation of spiking solutions for use in the high and low spike accuracy and precision experiments is below:

  • 3.16 EU/mL:316 μL of [20 EU/mL] + 1684 μL of LRW

  • 0.316 EU/mL:200 μL of [3.16 EU/mL] + 1800 μL of LRW

1.5 Sample Preparation

For each of three independent assays, prepare a sample of each lot as follows. Fresh preparations are made for each independent assay.

Solution

Preparation

Dilution Factor

Conc. (mg/mL)

A

   

B

   

C

   

D

   

1.6 Positive Product Control (PPC)

Prepare the PPC as directed in [Insert Local Method] using Solution D above and the 1.0 EU/mL standard described in Test Information.

1.7 Accuracy and Precision

Prepare the accuracy and precision experiment samples by spiking 10 μL of the 3.16 EU/mL (high) and 0.316 EU/mL (low) spiking solutions into Solution D aliquots in the test plate.

1.8 pH Suitability

Determine item pH suitability by evaluating the item pH of the neat sample solution, diluted test solution, or the diluted test solution combined 1:1 with rFC reagent. Once the pH is shown to be within the acceptable range of 6.0–8.0, it is unnecessary to test subsequent solutions.

1.9 Analysis and Documentation of Results

Documentation of the execution of this protocol may be recorded in printed copies of the protocol attachment. Each independent sample analysis must meet all data acceptance criteria for the result(s) to be considered valid and acceptable for use in the validation documentation. Report results as per software report. [Insert Local Investigation Scenario Requirements].

1.10 Data Acceptance Criteria Per Assay

Parameter

Acceptance criteria

Rationale

r

0.980–1.000

Criteria from compendia and per Global Method

y-intercept

2.500–5.000

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

Slope

0.760–1.110

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

PPC

50–200%

Criteria from compendia and per Global Method

%CV of top standard

<25.00%

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

% CV of middle standard

<25.00%

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

% CV of low standard

<25.00%

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

%CV of sample

<25.00%, if applicable

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

%CV of PPC Sample

<25.00%

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

pH

pH of test article at time of assay must be within 6.0–8.0.

Criteria from reagent supplier and per Global Method

1.11 Validation Criteria

Parameter

Acceptance criteria

Rationale

Accuracy

Average recovery (%) of each challenge concentration must be NLT 50% or NMT 200% of theoretical concentration

[Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]

Precision

Precision of each challenge recovery (%CV) must be <25.00%

Based on final average of each spiked concentration (high and low); calculated and reported in the validation report

[Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]

Inhibition/Enhancement

Positive product control (PPC) recovery is 50–200%

[Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]

pH

pH value must be 6.0–8.0

[Insert Local Validation Strategy Document]

1.12 Analysis of Failed Results

If the validation criteria are not met a technical review of the results will be initiated to determine appropriate action.

A qualified individual will evaluate the data to determine if the acceptance criteria outlined in this protocol have been met. If the validating lab does not meet the criteria set forth in this protocol, an investigation and any supplemental actions will be conducted as per local procedure.

1.13 Departures from Protocol

Summarize any protocol departures or investigations including whether data were accepted or not with rationale and references to the detailed information as per local standard operating procedures.

1.14 Reasons for Revision

Version

Reason

Author

0

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bolden, J. (2019). Recombinant Factor C. In: Williams, K. (eds) Endotoxin Detection and Control in Pharma, Limulus, and Mammalian Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17148-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics