Skip to main content

Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Education Today

Abstract

Capstone design courses play an important role in the preparation of engineering students for professional practice and career success. They allow students to apply what they have learned prior to their senior year along with newly developed skills relating to the solution of real-world design problems, often in a team environment with external clients. Team-based capstone design courses provide opportunities for students to develop teamwork and communication skills. In the United States, accredited engineering programs are required to offer a major design experience; most programs fulfill this requirement through a capstone design course. Differences in course learning outcomes, management, structure, duration, projects, student teams, and required deliverables exist among institutions. This chapter presents the current state of engineering capstone design education and highlights changes to capstone design practices in the U.S. over the past 25 years, based on extensive, seminal surveys of capstone design programs. It discusses current practices and successful strategies in engineering capstone design education. The chapter includes perspectives and feedback from hundreds of engineering capstone design faculty regarding their personal experiences with capstone design programs. This chapter also provides recommendations for supporting engineering capstone design experiences based on the authors’ vast experience teaching and managing capstone design courses and engaging with the capstone design community. These recommendations include scaffolding the design curriculum, fostering industry involvement in capstone design courses, keeping courses and faculty up-to-date with current design practices, obtaining organizational support for capstone design courses, sourcing capstone design projects, and preparing students for professional practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABET (2018) Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2018–2019. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/E001-18-19-EAC-Criteria-11-29-17.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2018

  • ASEE (2012) Innovation with impact: creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright A, Phillips JR (1999) The Harvey Mudd engineering clinic: past, present, future. J Eng Educ 88(2):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • College Affordability Guide (2016) Degree prospects: course credit plus a paycheck. http://www.collegeaffordabilityguide.org/co-op-programs. Accessed 11 July 2018

  • Dixon, D (2012) Experiencing capstone design problem statements. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, D (2014) Technical design reviews in capstone. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J (2007) Capstone design courses: producing industry-ready biomedical engineers. Morgan and Claypool, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J (2012a) Capstone design courses: part II: preparing biomedical engineers for the real world. Morgan and Claypool, Boulder CO

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J (2012b) Learning to identify unmet needs and new product opportunities. Int J Eng Educ 28(2):349–354

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J (2014) Faculty internships for capstone design instructors: maintaining an up-to-date capstone design course. IEEE Pulse

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J (2016) Co-ops and capstone design: are they interchangeable? IEEE Pulse

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J, Cariapa V, Corliss G, Kaiser K (2014) Benefits of industry involvement in multidisciplinary capstone design courses. Int J Eng Educ 30(1):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J, Howe S (2015) Virtual capstone design teams: preparing for global innovation. Int J Eng Educ 31(6B):1773–1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J, Malassigne P (2017) Lessons learned from a 10-year collaboration between biomedical engineering and industrial design students in capstone design projects. Int J Eng Educ 33(5):1513–1520

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauhart R, Grahe J (2015) Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S (2008) Focused follow-up to 2005 national survey. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S (2010) Where are we now: statistics on capstone courses nationwide. Adv Eng Educ 2(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S (2015) Industry immersion: the impacts of a sabbatical deep-dive. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S, Lasser R, Su K, Pedicini S (2009) Content in capstone design courses: pilot survey results from faculty, students, and industry. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S, Rosenbauer L (2017) Extending the 2015 capstone design survey: data from Australia and New Zealand. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe S, Rosenbauer L, Poulos S (2017) The 2015 capstone design survey results: current practices and changes over time. Int J Eng Educ 33(5):1393–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton R, Loughry M, Ohland M, Ricco G (2010) Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria. Adv Eng Educ 2(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lulay K (2015) Implementation of a design spine for a mechanical engineering curriculum. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L, Trevisan M, Davis D, Beyerlein S (2004) Capstone design courses and assessment: a national study. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A (2014) Value proposition handbook. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Pembridge J, Paretti M (2010) The current state of capstone design pedagogy. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M, Hayes C, Lynch K (2015) Survey of mechanical engineering capstone design courses—summary of results. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Education Leadership Summit, Newport Beach, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein D, Bullard L, Seider W, Vigeant M (2013) How we teach: capstone design. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd R, Magleby S, Sorensen C, Swan B, Anthony D (1995) A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. J Eng Educ 84(2):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susannah Howe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Howe, S., Goldberg, J. (2019). Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies. In: Schaefer, D., Coates, G., Eckert, C. (eds) Design Education Today. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17133-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17134-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics