Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Strategic Design Approach for Anticipating the Future World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Education Today

  • 850 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s globalised economy, the search for competitive advantage in developing innovative products, services and systems, has been substituted by organisations’ combined efforts to establish collaborative advantage. This means that the creation of ‘stand-alone’ design solutions would no longer meet the needs for solving complex problems within an environment in which technologies become more advanced and complex and where end-user needs and stakeholders’ interests become more diverse. From an end-user perspective, effective and meaningful interactions are sought after, which are prospective and out of their frame of reference. From an organisational perspective, the growing complexity and pace of technological change are forcing firms to forge new vertical and horizontal network alliances to seek greater speed, flexibility and efficiency in responding to market changes. This book chapter aims to present a strategic design methodology to be implemented in a collaborative studio setting within the context of design education. It can be used as a blueprint for planning strategic activities, collaborative constructs and directions when strategizing for and with different types of organisations. The educational value lies in subjecting master students to situations, where they learn to balance the interests of the client organisation, end users and other stakeholders through deliberate and emergent strategic moves. By acting as consultants and interacting with a real industrial client, established design consultancies and other stakeholders, this proposed strategic design process elucidates an educational philosophy of mentorship and scholarship. Through a construct of Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) students contribute to a systemic and processual view on learning, where structured planning and the deliberate use of processes and methods should complement emergent praxis. Furthermore, initiatives to formalise and communicate these processes and methods will also educate the client organisation and their respective stakeholders of “What Strategic Design is about”, and how it complements an inside-out marketing and management view on strategizing, by focusing on and anticipating end-user needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamsen MH, Henneberg SC, Huemer L, Naudé P (2016) Network picturing: an action research study of strategizing in business networks. Ind Mark Manag 59:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrand B, Lampel J, Mintzberg, H (2001) Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P, Holmen E, Pedersen A-C (2018) Que Sera, sera? Conceptualizing business network foresighting. IMP J 12(1):56–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMP-03-2017-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KR (1980) The concept of corporate strategy. Richard D Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff HI (1968) Corporate strategy. Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff HI (1986) Corporate strategy: an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Apte M (1994) Language in sociocultural context. In: Asher RE (ed) The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol 4. Oxford, Pergamon Press, pp 2000–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau P, Griffin A, Somermeyer SM (2004) The PDMA toolbook for new product development. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry JW (2003) Conceptual approaches to acculturation. American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagia J, Tinsley JA (2000) The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clin Proc 75:535–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer E (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professorate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z (2000) Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plann 15(3):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs J (2003) Modelling product innovation processes, from linear logic to circular chaos. Creat Innov Manag 12(2):76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs J, Valkenburg R (1996) Integrale Produktontwikkeling. LEMMA BV, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski M, Śniegocki, A (2017) Megatrends. Wise Europa – Warsaw Institute for Economic and European Studies, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns G, Wright G (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of scenario interventions within organizations. In: Scenario thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JA (2000) Building the innovative organization. MacMillan Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioural theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies AR (2014) Co-creating sustainable eating futures: technology, ICT and citizen–consumer ambivalence. Futures 62:181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies AR, Doyle R, Pape J (2012) Future visioning for sustainable household practices: spaces for sustainability learning? Area 44:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Ouden E (2011) Innovation design: creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council, Creative and Cultural Skills (2006) Creative and cultural skills, design a new design industry: design skills consultation

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K (2008) Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Des Stud 29(1):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreborg KH (1996) Essence of backcasting. Futures 28(9):813–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JR (2008) Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1981) Behavioural decision theory: processes of judgment and choice. Annu Rev Psychol 32:53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leytesdorff L (1997) Universities in the global economy: a triple helix of academic-industry-government relation. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg J (1994) Technology and international differences in growth rates. J Econ Lit 35:1147–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble RJ, Aglionby J, Quan J (1994) Tree resources and environmental policy: a stakeholder approach, vol 7. Natural Resources Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1963) A system for the notation of proxemic behavior1. Am Anthropol 65(5):1003–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor Doubleday Press, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P, van Dijk M, Lloyd P (2011) Vision in product design: handbook for innovators

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill T, Westbrook R (1997) SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plan 30(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Bond MH (1988) The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organ Dyn 16(4):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, Revised and expanded 2 edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmen E, Pedersen A-C (2003) Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Ind Mark Manag 32(5):409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V (eds) (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Wilemon D (2002) Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R&D Manag 32(4):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbeck FL (1961) Variations in value orientations. Greenwood Press, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen PA, Ajamian G, Burkart R, Clamen A, Davidson J, D’Amoe R, Elkins C, Herald K, Incorvia M, Johnson A, Karol R, Seibert R, Slavejkov A, Wagner K (2001) New concept development model: providing clarity and a common language to the ‘fuzzy front end’ of innovation. Res Technol Manag 44(2):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber AL, Parsons T (1958) The concept of culture and of social system. Am Sociol Rev 23(5), (14, p. 583)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry C (2012) The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson AL (2000) Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurship lens. business strategy and the environment. Bus Strat Environ 9:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WP, Bonollo E (2002) An analysis of professional skills in design: implications for education and research. Des Stud 23:385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem A (2008) Developing a win-win mentorship-scholarship, higher education model for design through collaborative learning. UNIPED (Tromsø) 31(3):32–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, E, Meroni, A (2007) Emerging user demands for sustainable solutions, EMUDE. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now: essays and selected projects. Basel, Birkhäuser Basel, pp 157–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Medlin CJ, Törnroos JÅ (2014) Interest, sensemaking and adaptive processes in emerging business networks—an Australian biofuel case. Ind Mark Manag 43(6):1096–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroni A (2008) Strategic design: where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strat Des Res J 1:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev 72(1):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strat Manag J 6(3):257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muszyński J (2001) Megatrendy a polityka. Wyd. Atla 2, Wrocław

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe R (2003) From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Constr Manag Econ 21(8):841–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhelman M (2001) Education through design. Des Issues 17(3):83–87. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy JA (2002) Creating better futures: scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T, Shils EA (1951) Toward a general theory of action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pęciak R (2016) Megatrends and their implications in the globalised world. Horyzonty Polityki 7(21):167–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance (Advantage C), vol 167

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandecki K (2014) Theoretical aspects of sustainable energy. Energy Environ Eng 2(4):83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Press M, Cooper R (2003) The design experience: the role of design and designers in the twenty-first century. Ashgate Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist J, Green K, Szita Toth K, Young W (2002) Stakeholder involvement and alliances for sustainable shopping, cooking and eating. In: Bruijn T, Tukker A (eds) Partnerships and leadership: building alliances for a sustainable future. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 273–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quist J, Vergragt P (2006) Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38(9):1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér P (2003) Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy-making. J Manag Stud 40(1):57–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2014) The zero marginal cost society: the internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck R, Gemünden HG (2011) Corporate foresight: its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(2):231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth S (1999) The state of design research. Des Issues 15(2):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (2017) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethia NK (2001) Generating and exploiting interdisciplinary knowledge in design product development and innovation in the new economy. In: The 2001 IDSA national education conference (CD ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjonsson JB, Holgersen TD (2010) What do they do? A survey of employment and work situation for “IDE” candidates. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on engineering and product design education “New Paradigms and Approaches” (The Design Society and Institution of Engineering and Designers)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan AP (1963) My years with general motors. Sedgewick & Jackson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass A, Coyne R (1992) Models, metaphors, and the hermeneutics of designing. Des Issues 9(1):56–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub DW, Loch W, Aristo R, Karahanna E, Strite M (2002) Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. J Glob Inf Manag 10(1):13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenfelt A (2010) Two strategies for dealing with uncertainty in social-ecological systems. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann C (2002) Nellie is dead. Art Des Commun High Educ 1:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg R. Himmelstrand U, Brulin G (1987) The paradigm of economic sociology: premises and promises. Theory Soc 16(2):169–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner C (2011) Riding the waves of culture: understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey International

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A (2004) Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus Strat Environ 13(4):246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3:639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden K (2011) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt PJ, Quist J (2011) Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78(5):747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihrich H (1982) The TOWS matrix—a tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan 15(2):54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organ Artic 7(2):225–246. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington R (2003) What is strategy- and does it matter?, 2nd edn. Cengage Learn EMEA, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington R (2006) Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organ Stud 27(5):613–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M-Y, You M, Chen F-C (2005) Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education and student career guidance. Des Stud 26(2):155–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn EOK (1999) Strategizing needs systems thinking. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference of the system dynamics society and Australian New Zealand systems conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 20–23 July

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the results of strategic and collaborative project work, which has been completed by 4th year (1st years M.Sc.) Industrial Design students in the spring semester of 2018. Completed. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved this contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Kolbjørn hejes vei 2B, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    André Liem

Authors
  1. André Liem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Liem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Industrial Design, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Dirk Schaefer

  2. School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK

    Graham Coates

  3. School of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Claudia Eckert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liem, A. (2019). A Strategic Design Approach for Anticipating the Future World. In: Schaefer, D., Coates, G., Eckert, C. (eds) Design Education Today. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17133-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17134-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation