Skip to main content

A Government-Dominated Financial System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demystifying China’s Stock Market
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

The design and development of a financial system with Chinese characteristics have been dominated by the government since the 1980s. The creation of the stock market is only one stage in that process. Three major features of such government domination are emphasized in this chapter.

First, we will review the difficulties raised when trying to fit a stock market into a socialist market economy. We will consider the motivations behind the transformation in the channels of financing of the economy. While the initial move, in the mid-1980s, involved a shift of the financing of state-owned enterprises from government subsidies to bank-intermediated financing, the subsequent move, in the early 1990s, marked a partial shift to direct financing, with the creation of the stock market.

Second, we will present the major stages of development of the stock market, including the crucial step of Chinese-style privatization, involving the privatization of small- and medium-sized SOEs, sometimes with insider privatization, and the listing of large SOEs, leading much later to the split-share reform bringing the float closer to capitalization.

Third, the heavy involvement of the government is strongly felt in new market creation, the creation and control of institutional investors and intermediaries, as well as the design and monitoring of the functioning of the market. External financial liberalization has been only very limited and gradual, relying on tightly controlled idiosyncratic schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Accounting in the history of China may have used the double-entry form as early as the late fifteenth century (Lin 1992). However, this is a subject of controversy (surveyed by Hoskin and Macve 2012).

  2. 2.

    On the background of privatization in socialist countries, see Roland (2000).

  3. 3.

    A review of the content and implications of this policy is carried out by Hsieh and Song (2015).

  4. 4.

    For an assessment of the effects of privatization see Bai et al. (2009

  5. 5.

    Montinola et al. (1995), as the whole literature on that subject in China, use the term decentralization, but they actually mean deconcentration, which refers to the dispersion of control within one single hierarchical organization, and not to the transfer of control from one organization to another. Indeed in China, the local leaders are not chosen at the local level but appointed by the higher level of jurisdiction.

  6. 6.

    Among the few empirical works which have taken such social factors into account, Matthews et al. (2009) is noteworthy. They document that when allocative inefficiency is viewed as the optimal by-product of an allocation of resource inputs subject to employment constraints Chinese banks are similar to their western peers.

  7. 7.

    An overview of institutional investors is provided by Sun et al. (2015).

  8. 8.

    Empirical work on the effects on China’s stock market of intra-day price limits and trading halts includes Wan et al. (2018) and Xu et al. (2014). Chung et al. (2013) and Lao et al. (2018) provide a microstructure study and measures of liquidity. An early review of market organization is provided by Xu (2000).

  9. 9.

    China’s GEM is examined in detail by Liu and Wang (2015).

  10. 10.

    The venture capital industry started in the 1990s with foreign listed funds (Wang and Li 2015), and rose significantly in the new millennium with both private and government backed initiatives (Zhang and Mayes 2018). Ahlstrom and Bruton (2003) and Ahlstrom et al. (2007) emphasize that both the challenges encountered by venture capitalists and the nature of the investment framework employed in China differ markedly from those of the west.

  11. 11.

    The development and problems of China’s stock index futures are surveyed by Zhou (2015).

  12. 12.

    The corporate bond market consists of the following types of instruments: Corporate bonds, typically those of SOEs, issued on the interbank bond market (21% of the market); Commercial papers (17%) and medium-term notes (29%) issued by domestic companies and regulated by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII); and Corporate bonds (18%) issued by a whole range of private sector issuers and listed on either the SSE or SZSE, regulated by the CSRC. Issuance standards vary widely among different types of bonds. Corporate bond issuance process is still based on a quota, which is prone to great administrative influence.

  13. 13.

    Price convergence should be helped by the Connect program but is weakened by a strong regulatory regime and large demand shocks (Hegde and Peng 2017). The price gaps of cross-listed stocks still persist after the Connect but are increasing at a slower speed. Similar patterns are found in the turnover, volatility, and liquidity gaps of the two markets. See also Kashyap (2016).

References

  • Acemoglu, D. 2013. The Future of Chinese Growth: Institutional Perspectives. MIT, Manuscript, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., and G.D. Bruton. 2003. An Institutional View of China’s Venture Capital Industry: Explaining the Difference Between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., G.D. Bruton, and K.S. Yeh. 2007. Venture Capital in China: Past, Present and Future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24 (3): 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian. 2005. Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Financial. Economics 77: 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C.-E., D. Li, Z. Tao, and Y. Wang. 2000. A Multitask Theory of State Enterprise Reform. Journal of Comparative Economics 28: 716–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C.-E., J. Lu, and Z. Tao. 2006. The Multitask Theory of State Enterprise Reform: Empirical Evidence from China. American Economic Review 96 (2): 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. How Does Privatization Work in China? Journal of Comparative Economics 37: 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C.-E., and L.C. Xu. 2005. Incentives for CEOs with Multitasks: Evidence from Chinese State-owned Enterprises. Journal of Comparative Economics 33: 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrati, A., B. Bortolotti, and M. Caccavaio. 2012. The Stock Market Reaction to the 2005 Split Share Structure Reform in China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal 20: 543–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, P., and G. White. 1993. The Political Economy of China’s Financial Reforms: Finance in Late Development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Y. Qian, and B.R. Weingast. 1999. From Federalism, Chinese Style, to Privatization, Chinese Style. Economics of Transition 7 (1): 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H., C. Gao, J. Lu, and B. Misrach. 2013. An Empirical Analysis of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Limit Order Book. Economic Modelling 34: 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., and C. Xu. 2005. Market Socialism or Capitalism? Evidence from Chinese Financial Market Development. IEA Roundtable on Market and Socialism, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewsmith, J. 1994. Dilemmas of Reform in China: Political Conflict and Economic Debate. London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisst, C.R. 1997. Wall Street: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardin, E. 1997. Banking Sector Reform and Credit Control in China. Paris: Development Centre Studies, OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Roger H., and Wei Li. 2003. Government as a Discriminating Monopolist in the Financial Market: The Case of China. Journal of Public Economics 87 (2): 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, A., and B.L.R. Smith, eds. 1997. Sequencing? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegde, S., and J. Peng. 2017. One Security, Two Prices: Evidence on Stock Market Bubbles from the Shanghai-Hong Kong Connect Program. Department of Finance, University of Connecticut, Manuscript, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, K., and R. Macve. 2012. Contesting the Indigenous Development of “Chinese Double-entry Bookkeeping” and Its Significance in China’s Economic Institutions and Business Organization Before c.1850. Working Paper No. 156/12, London School of Economics, Department of Economic History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C.-T., and Z. Song. 2015. Grasp the Large, Let Go of the Small: The Transformation of the State Sector in China. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 295–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarai, Z. 1989. The Goals and Conditions for Setting up a Stock Market in Hungary. European Economic Review 33 (2–3): 448–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, R. 2016. Hong Kong-Shanghai Connect/Hong Kong Beijing Disconnect (?): Scaling the Great Wall of Chinese Securities Trading Costs. The Journal of Trading 11 (3): 81–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1980. Economics of Shortage, 2 vols. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S.W., and Y. Yang. 2009. From Scorned to Loved? The Political Economy of the Development of the Stock Market in China. Global Economic Review 38 (4): 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O., and F. Taylor. 1938. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao, L., S. Tian, and Q. Zhao. 2018. Will Order Imbalances Predict Stock Returns in Extreme Market Situations? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54: 921–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z.L. 1992. Chinese Double-entry Bookkeeping Before the Nineteenth Century. Accounting Historians Journal 19 (2): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., and J. Wang. 2015. Development, Problems and Suggestions for China’s GEM. In The Chinese Stock Market, ed. S. Cheng and Z. Li, vol. 1, 368–410. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K., Z. Xiao, and X. Zhang. 2009. Rational Cost Inefficiency in Chinese Banks. Working Paper 29/2009, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R.I. 1993. The Order of Liberalization/Financial Control in the Transition to a Market Economy. 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, G., Y. Qian, and B. Weingast. 1995. Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China. World Politics 48 (1): 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. 2007. The Chinese Economy: Transition and Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuti, D.M. 1989. Remonetization and Capital Markets in the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies. European Economic Review 33 (2–3): 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.H. 2019. Measuring China’s Economic Reform Progress. China Economic Review 53 (1): 342–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, K., and C. Xu. 2005. Governing Stock Markets in Transition Economies: Lessons from China. American Law and Economics Review 7 (1): 184–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. 2000. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Z. Zheng, and H. Dong. 2015. Institutional Investors in Chinese Stock Markets. In The Chinese Stock Market Volume 1: A Retrospect and Analysis from 2002, ed. S. Cheng and Z. Li, 106–186. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C. 2014. Was Deng Xiaoping Right? An Overview of China’s Equity Markets. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 26 (3): 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C., and F. Howie. 2006. Privatizing China: Inside China’s Stock Markets. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Y.-L., G.-J. Wang, Z.-Q. Jiang, W.-J. Xie, and W.-X. Zhou. 2018. The Cooling Off Effect of Price Limits and Trading Halts. Physica A 505: 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., and B. Li. 2015. Venture Capital: Research Status and Prospects for the Future. Journal of Economics and Public Finance 1 (1): 60–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. 2005. Understanding and Interpreting Chinese Economic Reform. Mason: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C.K. 2000. The Microstructure of the Chinese Stock Market. China Economic Review 11: 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H.-C., W. Zhang, and Y.-F. Liu. 2014. Short-term Reaction After Trading Halts in the Chinese Stock Market. Physica A 401: 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., and D.G. Mayes. 2018. The Performance of Governmental Venture Capital Firms: A Life Cycle Perspective and Evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal 48: 162–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. 2015. Development and Problems of Stock Index Futures and Margin Trading and Short Selling in China. In The Chinese Stock Market, ed. S. Cheng and Z. Li, vol. 1, 313–367. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Girardin, E., Liu, Z. (2019). A Government-Dominated Financial System. In: Demystifying China’s Stock Market. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17123-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17123-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17122-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17123-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics