Skip to main content

Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Japan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology

Abstract

To regulate the research and industrial uses of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), Japan enacted the Act on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity through Regulations on the Use of Living Modified Organisms 2003. This law can be regarded as a product-based GMO regulation. To date, Japan has approved 133 GM crop varieties for cultivation, distribution, and import, thus becoming a major importer of GM crops in the world. However, no GM crops have been commercially cultivated in Japan, except one ornamental GM flower. A recent consumer survey showed that 40.7% of respondents expressed concern over the safety of GM food products. Meanwhile, some Japanese researchers have already used robust genome editing techniques, such as CRISPR-Cas9, and reported gene-disrupted apple, potato, soybean, tomato and rice. In 2017, a GM rice variety was approved as Japan’s first field trial of a genome edited crop. In contrast, some citizen groups expressed opposition to the cultivation test and demanded the regulation of genome edited crops. However, relevant ministries have not considered the regulation of any uses of genome editing in earnest. The current state of Japan does not warrant a promising future of genome edited crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    IMF (2016).

  2. 2.

    MAFF (2017d).

  3. 3.

    MAFF (2017b).

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Biosafety Clearing House (2018).

  7. 7.

    MAFF (2017a).

  8. 8.

    Suntory (2018).

  9. 9.

    CAA (2017b).

  10. 10.

    Lusser et al. (2011).

  11. 11.

    Gaj et al. (2013) and Jiang and Doudna (2017).

  12. 12.

    Araki and Ishii (2015).

  13. 13.

    EFSA (2012).

  14. 14.

    Op. cit. 10.

  15. 15.

    Nishitani et al. (2016), Nakajima et al. (2017), Sawai et al. (2014), Kanazashi et al. (2018), Ito et al. (2015), and Endo et al. (2016).

  16. 16.

    MOE (2017).

  17. 17.

    Ministry of Justice (2018).

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Biosafety Clearing House (2000).

  20. 20.

    Op.cit 17.

  21. 21.

    MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003b).

  22. 22.

    Ishii and Araki (2017).

  23. 23.

    SCJ (2014).

  24. 24.

    MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003a).

  25. 25.

    Op. cit.7.

  26. 26.

    MAFF (2017c).

  27. 27.

    MAFF (2018b).

  28. 28.

    Ryffel (2014).

  29. 29.

    MOE (2016).

  30. 30.

    MAFF (2018a).

  31. 31.

    Gaj et al. (2013).

  32. 32.

    Jiang and Doudna (2017).

  33. 33.

    Kim and Kim (2016).

  34. 34.

    Op. Cit. 32.

  35. 35.

    Tang et al. (2017).

  36. 36.

    Op.cit.21.

  37. 37.

    Op.cit.10.

  38. 38.

    Svitashev et al. (2016) and Butler et al. (2015).

  39. 39.

    Burgos et al. (2014).

  40. 40.

    Busconi et al. (2012) and Burgos et al. (2014).

  41. 41.

    Bergelson et al. (1998).

  42. 42.

    Ishii and Araki (2016).

  43. 43.

    Joung (2015).

  44. 44.

    Op.cit.15.

  45. 45.

    J-BCH (2018).

  46. 46.

    Luo et al. (2015).

  47. 47.

    AAGS (2014).

  48. 48.

    Jackson (2016).

  49. 49.

    Op.cit.16.

  50. 50.

    Segawa and Hatano (2012) and Nishiyama (2012).

  51. 51.

    Segawa and Hatano (2012).

  52. 52.

    Op.cit.23.

  53. 53.

    MAFF (2015).

  54. 54.

    Op.cit.16.

  55. 55.

    Op.cit. 42.

  56. 56.

    CAA (2017a).

  57. 57.

    EC (2013).

  58. 58.

    Ibid.

  59. 59.

    Op.cit. 56.

  60. 60.

    CAA (2018a).

  61. 61.

    Hirasawa (2017).

  62. 62.

    CAA (2018b).

  63. 63.

    Op. Cit. 9.

  64. 64.

    Op.cit. 17.

  65. 65.

    Biosafety Clearing House (2017).

  66. 66.

    Hirosaki University and NARO (2017).

  67. 67.

    Tane to Syoku to Hito @Forum (2017a).

  68. 68.

    Seikatsu Club (2017).

  69. 69.

    Tane to Syoku to Hito @Forum (2017b).

  70. 70.

    Op.cit. 42.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Ishii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ishii, T. (2019). Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Japan. In: Dederer, HG., Hamburger, D. (eds) Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17118-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17119-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics