Abstract
To regulate the research and industrial uses of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), Japan enacted the Act on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity through Regulations on the Use of Living Modified Organisms 2003. This law can be regarded as a product-based GMO regulation. To date, Japan has approved 133 GM crop varieties for cultivation, distribution, and import, thus becoming a major importer of GM crops in the world. However, no GM crops have been commercially cultivated in Japan, except one ornamental GM flower. A recent consumer survey showed that 40.7% of respondents expressed concern over the safety of GM food products. Meanwhile, some Japanese researchers have already used robust genome editing techniques, such as CRISPR-Cas9, and reported gene-disrupted apple, potato, soybean, tomato and rice. In 2017, a GM rice variety was approved as Japan’s first field trial of a genome edited crop. In contrast, some citizen groups expressed opposition to the cultivation test and demanded the regulation of genome edited crops. However, relevant ministries have not considered the regulation of any uses of genome editing in earnest. The current state of Japan does not warrant a promising future of genome edited crops.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
IMF (2016).
- 2.
MAFF (2017d).
- 3.
MAFF (2017b).
- 4.
Ibid.
- 5.
Ibid.
- 6.
Biosafety Clearing House (2018).
- 7.
MAFF (2017a).
- 8.
Suntory (2018).
- 9.
CAA (2017b).
- 10.
Lusser et al. (2011).
- 11.
- 12.
Araki and Ishii (2015).
- 13.
EFSA (2012).
- 14.
Op. cit. 10.
- 15.
- 16.
MOE (2017).
- 17.
Ministry of Justice (2018).
- 18.
Ibid.
- 19.
Biosafety Clearing House (2000).
- 20.
Op.cit 17.
- 21.
MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003b).
- 22.
Ishii and Araki (2017).
- 23.
SCJ (2014).
- 24.
MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003a).
- 25.
Op. cit.7.
- 26.
MAFF (2017c).
- 27.
MAFF (2018b).
- 28.
Ryffel (2014).
- 29.
MOE (2016).
- 30.
MAFF (2018a).
- 31.
Gaj et al. (2013).
- 32.
Jiang and Doudna (2017).
- 33.
Kim and Kim (2016).
- 34.
Op. Cit. 32.
- 35.
Tang et al. (2017).
- 36.
Op.cit.21.
- 37.
Op.cit.10.
- 38.
- 39.
Burgos et al. (2014).
- 40.
- 41.
Bergelson et al. (1998).
- 42.
Ishii and Araki (2016).
- 43.
Joung (2015).
- 44.
Op.cit.15.
- 45.
J-BCH (2018).
- 46.
Luo et al. (2015).
- 47.
AAGS (2014).
- 48.
Jackson (2016).
- 49.
Op.cit.16.
- 50.
- 51.
Segawa and Hatano (2012).
- 52.
Op.cit.23.
- 53.
MAFF (2015).
- 54.
Op.cit.16.
- 55.
Op.cit. 42.
- 56.
CAA (2017a).
- 57.
EC (2013).
- 58.
Ibid.
- 59.
Op.cit. 56.
- 60.
CAA (2018a).
- 61.
Hirasawa (2017).
- 62.
CAA (2018b).
- 63.
Op. Cit. 9.
- 64.
Op.cit. 17.
- 65.
Biosafety Clearing House (2017).
- 66.
Hirosaki University and NARO (2017).
- 67.
Tane to Syoku to Hito @Forum (2017a).
- 68.
Seikatsu Club (2017).
- 69.
Tane to Syoku to Hito @Forum (2017b).
- 70.
Op.cit. 42.
References
Academic Association for Genetic Studies (AAGS) (2014) Statement, opinion and policy on the management of organisms generated using genome editing. http://www.idenshikyo.jp/genome-editing/genome-editing_1.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Araki M, Ishii T (2015) Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends Plant Sci 20:145–149
Bergelson J, Purrington CB, Wichmann G (1998) Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature 395:25
Biosafety Clearing House (2000) Article 3 in Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Biosafety Clearing House (2017) Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur supplementary protocol on liability and redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/supplementary/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Biosafety Clearing House (2018) Cartagena Protocol Country Profile: Japan. https://bch.cbd.int/about/countryprofile.shtml?country=jp. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Burgos NR, Singh V, Tseng TM, Black H et al (2014) The impact of herbicide-resistant rice technology on phenotypic diversity and population structure of United States weedy rice. Plant Physiol 166:1208–1220
Busconi M, Rossi D, Lorenzoni C et al (2012) Spread of herbicide-resistant weedy rice (red rice, Oryza sativa L.) after 5 years of Clearfield rice cultivation in Italy. Plant Biol 14:751–759
Butler NM, Atkins PA, Voytas DF et al (2015) Generation and inheritance of targeted mutations in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas system. PLoS One 10:e0144591
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2017a) The situations on labelling system of food products applied genetic recombination technology. http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/other/pdf/genetically_modified_food_170426_0003.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2017b) Report on consumer’s attitude towards food labelling 2016 (April 26, 2018). http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/information/research/2016/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2018a) Study group on the labelling of genetic recombination technology. http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/other/genetically_modified_food.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2018b) Report on 28 March 2018: study group on the labelling of genetic recombination technology. http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/other/review_meeting_010/pdf/review_meeting_010_180419_0003.pdf. Accessed 5 Jun 2018
Endo M, Mikami M, Toki S (2016) Biallelic gene targeting in Rice. Plant Physiol 170:667–677
European Commission (EC) (2013) Traceability and labelling of GMOs and GM food/feed products. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/gmo/traceability_labelling_en. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2012) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed using Zinc Finger Nuclease 3 and other site-directed nucleases with similar function (18 October 2012). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2943/epdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF 3rd (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405
Hirasawa Y (2017) Call for reconsideration: labelling of ‘genetic recombination technology not applied’ may misleading. Sankei Shimbun, 6 November 2017
Hirosaki University and NARO (2017) Press release by Hirosaki University and National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO): starting field trial of a new potato variety produced by a new breeding technique. http://www.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/wordpress2014/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/20170420.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016) World Economic Outlook Database, October 2016. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ishii T, Araki M (2016) Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep 35:1507–1518
Ishii T, Araki M (2017) A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops. GM Crops Food 8:44–56
Ito Y, Nishizawa-Yokoi A, Endo M et al (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 467:76–82
Jackson SA (2016) Rice: the first crop genome. Rice 9:14
Japan Biosafety Clearing House (J-BCH) (2018) Containment measures to be taken in Type 2 use of living modified organisms for research and development. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/law.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Jiang F, Doudna JA (2017) CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys 46:505–529
Joung JK (2015) Unwanted mutations: standards needed for gene-editing errors. Nature 523:158
Kanazashi Y, Hirose A, Takahashi I et al (2018) Simultaneous site-directed mutagenesis of duplicated loci in soybean using a single guide RNA. Plant Cell Rep 37:553–563
Kim J, Kim J-S (2016) Bypassing GMO regulations with CRISPR gene editing. Nat Biotechnol 34:1014
Luo S, Li J, Stoddard TJ et al (2015) Non-transgenic plant genome editing using purified sequence-specific nucleases. Mol Plant 8:1425–1427
Lusser M, Parisi C, Pan D et al (2011) New plant breeding techniques – state-of-the-art and prospects for commercial development. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC63971.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003a) Guidance of implementation of assessment of adverse effect on biological diversity of Type 1 use 2003. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/law.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
MEXT-MHLW-MAFF-METI-MOE (2003b) Regulations related to the enforcement of the law concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity through regulations on the use of living modified organisms. http://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/law.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2015) Report by the study group on new breeding techniques in Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries: ‘Toward the Development and Application of Farm Products using New Plant Breeding Techniques such as Genome Editing’. http://www.affrc.maff.go.jp/docs/commitee/nbt/top.htm. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2017a) Approved living modified crops (as of Dec 19, 2017). http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/index.html#1. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2017b) Major crop exporters to Japan and their status of cultivation 2016. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/zyoukyou/attach/pdf/index-13.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2017c) Notification of inspection of living modified organisms in 2017. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/attach/pdf/index-67.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2017d) Outline of Japan’s export and import of agricultural forestry and fishery products. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/kokusai/attach/pdf/houkoku_gaikyou-1.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2018a) On the organisms produced by new plant breeding techniques. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/tetuduki/index.html#3-2. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) (2018b) On unapproved living modified petunia. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/petunia.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of Justice (2018) Act on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity through regulations on the use of living modified organisms 2003. http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=132&vm=04&re=01. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of the Environment (MOE) (2016) Regarding the results of examination of Cartagena Law enforcement and its public consultation. http://www.env.go.jp/press/102964.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Ministry of the Environment (MOE) (2017) Public consultation on type 1 use of living modified rice (No. 2 FY2016). http://www.env.go.jp/press/103721.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Nakajima I, Ban Y, Azuma A et al (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. PLoS One 12:e0177966
Nishitani C, Hirai N, Komori S et al (2016) Efficient genome editing in Apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 6:31481
Nishiyama A (2012) More complex techniques emerged in crop genetic recombination: where can a line of genetic recombination be drawn? Response by Japan government delayed in global discussions. Nikkei Shimbun on 28 August 2018
Ryffel GU (2014) Transgene flow: facts, speculations and possible countermeasures. GM Crops Food 5:249–258
Sawai S, Ohyama K, Yasumoto S et al (2014) Sterol side chain reductase 2 is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, the common precursor of toxic steroidal glycoalkaloids in potato. Plant Cell 26:3763–3774
Science Council of Japan (SCJ) (2014) Report: current status and issues of new plant breeding techniques. http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-22-h140826.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Segawa S, Hatano Y (2012) No vestiges after genetic modification: new techniques applied in crops by Tokushima University and Hiroshima University. Asahi Shimbun on 22 August 2018
Seikatsu Club (2017) Opposition to the approval of type 1 use of genetic recombinant rice. http://tokyo.seikatsuclub.coop/news/2017/04/post_87.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Suntory (2018) History of Blue Rose. https://www.suntory.co.jp/sic/research/s_bluerose/story/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B et al (2016) Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 7:13274
Tane To Syoku To Hito @FORUM (2017a) Opposition to the cultivation test of GM rise produced using genome editing in isolated fields. http://nongmseed.jp/?p=1923. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Tane To Syoku To Hito @FORUM (2017b) Request of a regulatory frame work for new plant breeding techniques on 8 June 2017. http://nongmseed.jp/?p=1994. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
Tang X, Lowder LG, Zhang T et al (2017) A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat Plants 3:17018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ishii, T. (2019). Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Japan. In: Dederer, HG., Hamburger, D. (eds) Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17118-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17119-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)